‘You cannot have rich countries without poor ones.’ Do you agree?

It is almost a characteristic of modern society that when progress takes place, a myriad of issues with regard to the purpose, the means as well as the implications of that progress will emerge. Consequently, the issue of inequality, as a result of disproportionate development among countries arises. Those countries with abundant financial resources due to such development are considered rich countries. However, nations that lose out in such unfair disproportionate development are known as poor countries. Considering such definitions of rich and poor countries, the presence of inequality among nations will undoubtedly result in the coexistence between rich and poor countries. However, it is apparent that one of the United Nations (UN) Millennia goals is to eradicate extreme poverty. In other words, the UN wants to reduce the number of countries considered poor.  Will such a situation result in the deterioration of the conditions of developed countries? It is in my opinion that rich countries will continue to exist, and even progress, and are not dependent on poor countries. This is due to reasons such as technological advancements, the change in the focus concerning the growth of certain industries and an increase in the demand for higher quality goods.

Rich countries have been highly dependent on poor countries in many ways. One of which is the dependence on poor countries for their labour so as to ensure the development of rich countries. Cheap labour is commonly found in poor countries due to the fact that the majority of citizens of those countries have low standards of living, quality of life and cost of living, thus allowing them to accept lower salaries. The rich countries exploit this comparative advantage as they attempt to expand and diversify their economy via outsourcing and ensure that their products remain cheap on the global stage, tapping on the benefits of globalisation and consequently, interdependence among countries. Nike, an American shoe company, opened various factories in poor countries such as Vietnam and China due to the presence of cheap labour to the extent that the labourers were acrimoniously exploited. Initially, Nike had a factory in South Korea. However, as it evolved from a poor country into a rich one, Nike had no incentive in continuing its processes in South Korea as the cost of labour rose; this American company was not dependent on South Korea anymore. As companies in rich countries continue to ensure that their products remain competitive, they will constantly be dependent on poor countries for their labour force.

Other than that, rich countries are dependent on poor countries for numerous necessities. More often than not, majority of the citizens in poor countries engage themselves in primary industries which include farming and the extraction of natural resources such as oil and precious metals. As countries develop into rich countries, their focus swerves towards the expansion of the secondary and tertiary industries such as services, processing and manufacturing industries since they include sectors which are highly profitable. Consequently, it can be inferred that as more poor countries progress out of the poverty cycle, there will be fewer areas throughout the world in which there will be farming activities and the extraction of vital resources such as oil and aluminium. Will there be a situation in which there will be a shortage of rice and meat due to the decrease in agricultural activities caused by development? If such a case was to occur, we, as part of the global society, will experience detrimental effects such as exponential increases in hunger related diseases and malnutrition. Today, a child dies from malnutrition or hunger-related diseases every 5 seconds; tomorrow, the situation may be worse. Countries such as Singapore, which have negligible natural resources, will be the worst hit. Despite being rich, they will not be able to sustain their growth as they are in no way self-sufficient from the food and natural resources perspectives. In that sense, rich countries may not be able to survive without poor countries.

However, if the world was to be in a situation in which there was the absence of poor countries, I am certain that rich countries will still exist and even continue to prosper. One of the prominent aims of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is to eradicate extreme poverty by 2015. Extreme poverty occurs when an individual survives on less than US$2.15 a day. Technically, if there was a moment in time in which no individual was considered poor, there would be no poor country as individuals are the building blocks of a country. As such, the UNDP envisions a world without any poor countries; this is, apparently, for the betterment of society at large.

The fact that countries develop means that there will be technological advancements and a shift in focus towards the growth of certain industries. Consequently, we would expect farming activities to decreases tremendously alongside the evolution of countries into developed, rich ones. However, this may not be the case. Applying technology in farming regions has led to an increase in the production of foodstuffs, as well as a more uniform quality of food. This has allowed the farmers in the United States of America (USA) to be among the most productive in the world. With just 0.3 per cent of the world’s agricultural workforce, the USA produces around 45 per cent of all soybeans, 40 per cent of all maize, 22 per cent of all beef, 25 per cent of all poultry meat and supplies up to half of the world’s grain exports. Thus, it is observed that the productivity, and hence profitability of primary industries, can be increased with the usage of modern technology; such technology can only be considered affordable if countries are not poor. We also realise that our basic necessities can still be met without the presence of poor countries. Thus, rich countries may still exist without poor countries and are not dependent on poor countries.

Furthermore, economically, rich countries will prosper.  As countries develop, people will demand better quality and a larger variety of goods and services. As such, the centre of attention of companies will change based on consumer trends. Many companies today have developed their research and development sects to ensure the competitiveness of their products. Specialised, skilled workers will be required for the sustenance of such jobs; such workers can mostly be found in rich, developed countries in which the majority of their populations are educated. Today, our society does not demand as many bicycles as before; we demand more motorised vehicles such as cars and motorcycles. This was especially observed in China as the number of vehicles purchased increased alongside the development of their economy. Thus, rich countries will prosper due to the increasing demand for skilled labour, based on changing trends of consumption, internationally that is caused by the basic principle of interdependence amongst countries.

Besides that, as poor countries move out of the causation cycle, the price of products will increase due to the increase in the cost of labour and consequently, cost of production. However, citizens of rich countries will still be able to afford such goods and services due to their high disposable incomes. Thus, it is almost impossible to imagine a time in which rich people in rich countries cannot afford their basic necessities due to their high prices. Today itself, such people demand expensive, luxurious items such as branded clothes and quality food. As such, although rich countries may suffer financially due to the increase in the cost of living, they will never fall due to such a problem.

In conclusion, rich countries will exist despite the absence of poor countries. Undeniably, rich countries are highly dependent on poor countries, mainly because of globalisation. However, rich countries will still exist due to the fact that their basic necessities will be met and that their high Gross Domestic Product will still be sufficient for their development. As such, rich countries should not be reluctant to assist in the development of poor countries into rich ones. Such an action may be detrimental to rich countries in the short term; nevertheless, abundant advantages such as increased productivity due to improvements and increased access to technology will be experienced in the long term. Thus, we should work towards the development of our international society for the benefit of the future of civilisation.

Fossil fuel extraction belongs in the past not the future. Evaluate this statement.

Possible Points of discussion for fossil fuel extraction belonging in the past not the future.

  • consider the reasons why fossil fuels may be the energy of the past
  • assess the alternatives to fossil fuel extraction
  • make a judgement based on a consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • fossil fuels becoming depleted, due to excessive extraction of them in the past
  • fossil fuels are damaging the environment and considerably increasing pollution
  • the stability of the international order being threatened by the dependence on fossil fuels
  • fossil fuels no longer being a primary source in many countries as they have been replaced by renewable energy
  • renewable energy not being able to meet the energy demands of many countries
  • continual improvements made in increasing the efficiency of renewable energy generation
  • modern nuclear energy provides a safe and reliable source of energy
  • the dangers of neglecting fossil fuels when other methods cannot deliver or are too costly.

To what extent has traditional family life lost its importance in your country?

Possible points for discussing if traditional family life has lost its importance

  • examine the role of the traditional family in their country
  • consider how far traditional family life has lost its importance
  • make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • the changing view of gender roles in society at large being reflected in life at home
  • less attention being given to the elders in society, with a resultant loss of respect
  • more knowledge of what is happening in the wider world provides alternative examples of family life
  • the influence of technology, especially on the young, meaning that family authority is eroded
  • most upbringing being still in the area of one’s birth, where tradition often prevails
  • how traditional values are linked to family structure and way of living
  • the impact of migration as people leave from or return to their countries
  • familial bonds being difficult to break, even when younger members leave the area.

The most successful businesses make the biggest profits. Evaluate this view.

Possible Points for discussing whether most successful businesses make the biggest profits

  • consider the importance of making profits in business
  • discuss other factors which may contribute to a business’s success
  • make a judgement, based on consideration of the evidence and argument put forward about most successful businesses.
  • businesses needing profits to survive; exceed their operational costs, gain market share and wide recognition of their brand
  • business owners, employees, shareholders and other stakeholders requiring the business to make a profit
  • alternative goals; providing a useful or novel product or service or solving an existing problem
  • some business owners simply wish to develop or share a skill, talent or love for their product or service
  • the calculation of ‘biggest profits’ depends on the scale of the business and its revenue-to-cost ratio
  • profit and ethics not being mutually exclusive; profitable businesses can more easily achieve philanthropy, ethical sourcing or greener practices
  • environmental, social, animal welfare or ethical credentials being a unique selling point
  • other success factors including market influence, brand recognition, customer service and treatment of employees.

Nations and peoples should always forgive the wrongs of the past. Evaluate this view.

Points discussing if nations and people should always forgive the wrongs of the past

  • show an understanding of the nature and role of forgiveness, in a national and personal context
  • discuss the extent to which past wrongdoing should always be forgiven
  • make a judgement, based on consideration of the evidence and argument put forward about.
  • the role of forgiveness for past wrongdoing in international relations
  • whether past actions can or should be forgiven depends on their intention, nature and impact
  • the severity, duration and reach of the impact of the wrongdoing needing to be taken into account
  • it being necessary to forgive the wrongs of the past in order to move forward and maintain economic, personal and diplomatic relationships
  • countries, their governments and people being more worthy of forgiveness if they show genuine remorse
  • attempts to make up for past actions and for repairing the damage done
  • some actions by countries, especially during the war, being so terrible that forgiveness may be extremely difficult
  • it may take a long period of time before forgiveness takes effect.

The media has become a dangerous part of daily life. To what extent do you agree?

Possible points for discussing if media has become a dangerous part of daily life

  • examine the role that media in its various forms must play in daily life
  • explore the extent to which media has become dangerous
  • make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • the media benefits daily life in many ways as it is an instant form of communication
  • media can inform, educate and inspire people of all ages
  • it allows for the showcasing of talents and gives great entertainment
  • it being a simple means of promoting awareness of products, services, views and ideals
  • media isolating people resulting in various social and health problems
  • the promotion of extreme views can have a damaging impact on society
  • media can be one-sided and give narrow viewpoints on important issues
  • inappropriate media having a damaging impact on children and other vulnerable people

Evaluate whether poets have any role to play in society.

Possible points for whether poets have any role to play in society.

  • explore the various forms that poetry can take
  • assess the function and role of poets in society
  • make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • poetry being a distinct literary art form, conveying a message in fewer words than a novel
  • poetry having historic and current roles being central to our culture
  • poets performing their work live as well as writing it down
  • new ideas about the understanding of poetry being established in the literary world
  • many poets writing in protest against various important current issues
  • poetry being conveyed by music, which may attract a wider audience
  • poets are not always looked at with favour, as many feel their role is not important in the world today
  • it is being difficult to engage young people in poetry as they argue that other subjects are more important.

To what extent do films have to be realistic to be enjoyable?

Possible points for discussing if films have to be realistic to be enjoyable

  • explore what constitutes realism in films
  • assess whether films need to be realistic to be enjoyable
  • make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • films that are realistic in terms of drawing on real life
  • the need for realistic places and locations to engage the audience
  • the need for believable characters in believable scenarios to whom we can relate
  • the importance of realism in documentary films and their impact on the audience
  • escapism being the main reason for watching a film for many
  • a film may be more unpleasant to view if it is too realistic
  • some people watch films in order to view extraordinary people or situations
  • too much emphasis on real-life could render a film as dull.

There should be no limits to a country’s surveillance of its citizens. Discuss.

Possible points for limits to a country’s surveillance of its citizens

  • explore the extent to which a country uses surveillance to observe its citizens
  • evaluate whether there should be limits on a country’s surveillance
  • make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • how surveillance is used to monitor people without their knowledge or approval
  • the moral implications of using spyware and other hidden software on devices
  • how the use of CCTV is ensuring the safety of a country’s citizens whilst removing privacy
  • the increasing use of fingerprint and facial recognition devices and their benefits and dangers
  • how companies are using data to profile and target us without our consent
  • the use of National Identity cards and the likely disenfranchisement of some citizens
  • the increasing use of listening devices and Smart items in everyday life
  • how increasing surveillance has helped law enforcement agencies to protect people.

To what extent is it necessary to reduce the number of vehicles on the roads of your country?

Possible points for discussing the necessity to reduce the number of vehicles

  • assess the number of vehicles on the roads
  • evaluate the extent to which it is necessary to reduce the number of vehicles
  • make a judgement, based on considering the evidence and argument put forward.
  • the need to reduce pollution and noise, especially in cities and towns
  • the negative impact of reducing the number of vehicles in terms of taxes,
  • jobs and technological developments
  • the constant need to replace road surfaces due to the number of cars
  • the need to create a safer environment for pedestrians, cyclists and commuters
  • the commercial benefits of pedestrianised zones might include access for supplies and people
  • reducing the number of cars being bought would have a negative economic impact
  • many jobs in the manufacturing industry are linked to the number of cars bought each year
  • improvements in urban infrastructure are often due to increased car usage.