Is complete self-sufficiency  in countries ever  possible?

The notion  of complete self-sufficiency was often seen  as a myth within the modern world as the contemporary developments of globalisation reveal  the  hyper-connected world we live in today, where  countries are succumbed to  the  interdependent  nature of the  global  economy. It  is not  surprising  to  see  that  countries across  the  world are increasingly dependent on one  another for their resources and  this is also regarded as the   norm   and   trait  of  today’s  world.  However,   issues   such  as  growing  demand and   potential  import disruptions  have  surfaced  recently,  with the  notable  COVID-19  pandemic threatening many  global  supply chains  and  affecting the  sufficiency and  sustainability of resources within nations. This raises  the  question if countries should  be pursuing complete self-sufficiency to minimise the threats from the external environment and to be able to maintain  itself without  outside aid or intervention. Even though some nations have pursued self-sufficiency to some degree and  have adopted incremental progress over the past  decade to provide for their own needs, in practice, self-sufficiency is arguably still viewed to be a relative concept along  a continuum that  is highly dependent on the global  climate.  This question raises the debate if complete self-sufficiency is even possible given the interdependent nature of our global  economy today. Is there any interests or benefits to aim for complete self-dependency in countries? What  are  the  factors  that  may influence, shape or limit such possibilities?

Governments should be responsible for funding a nation’s performing arts. Discuss.

• explore why a governments should be responsible to fund its nation’s performing arts
• explore the reasons why other sources should fund a nation’s performing arts
• make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward that governments should be responsible for funding.
• providing well-equipped venues for performances that would otherwise be unavailable
• ensuring that appropriate funds are allocated to different ventures
• funding would enable performances to go on tour to other areas
• such measures being a source of national pride, encouraging the continuance of national culture
the high cost of some performances might deflect funding from other important areas
• government funding might make attendance within reach of the less
wealthy
• niche performances can still go ahead even if audience numbers are lower
• a prestigious project could attract other investment and visitors to the country.

To what extent are timed examinations a fair means of assessment?

• consider the extent to which timed examinations are fair
• evaluate the effectiveness of other methods of assessment
• make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
• timed examinations only assess a portion of the taught content of a course
• how time restrictions limit students’ thinking and ability to develop ideas, adding unnecessary pressure
• revising and cramming means material is stored in the short-term memory
• the added value of work-based and continuous assessment showing what people can really do
• there being evidence that the focus and time pressure in examinations often yield a high standard of work
• the examination being a level playing field where everybody is in the same position and therefore it is fair
• the nature of formal examinations minimising the potential for copying or cheating
• examinations often being marked externally which is fairer than internal assessment.

Consider the  view that  more scientists than  artists  are needed in the  world today.

This essay explores the comparative usefulness of scientists and artists in the modern world. Knowing that the world today  depends heavily on the use of technology for survival, it is not surprising that  scientists are seen to  be  more  useful.  Artists are  considered  to  be  inconsequential to  the  overall  survival of societies as their usefulness is often  to abstract to be understood by the laypeople.

It is important  to  compare and  contrast between the  functions  and  purposes of scientists  versus artists  based on the  modern world contexts. The comparisons must be based on recognised criteria. Ensure that   the   comparison  is  within characteristics of the modern world.

‘As countries pursue development, heritage sites  are  losing their relevance.’ How far do  you agree?

Infrastructure development within a country will inevitably  will result  in some sacrifices  be  made. This question arises  from the  idea progress should   not  be  held  back  by  history.  Some  heritage  sites  carry  significant  cultural  and  historic symbolism for the community. However,  when countries have  to balance between progress and  history, it is often  inevitable  that  such  heritage sites  are  losing relevance to  make  way for  future  development. When  such heritage sites  are removed, the fear is that  the memories and  identity  of the community will be  lost.

Demonstrate that  heritage sites  are  losing  their  relevance based on their understanding regarding the pressures and demands that come from nations’ pursuit  of economic, social and political  developments. Evaluate  if the  functions  and  purposes of  heritage  sites continue to keep  their significance while nations develop.

There are no great leaders in the world today. Discuss.

• consider what makes a great leader
• explore a range of great leaders in the world from all areas of life
• make a judgement, based on the consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
• leaders that have brought their country through war, famine or other significant difficulties
• corrupt leaders, often lauded, diminishing the greatness of a country
• economic success being ascribed to great leadership and other factors
• great leaders in the world offering moral, ethical and spiritual leadership in a range of roles
• the many occasions when the really ‘great’ leaders are marginalised
• leaders that are feared or revered and the effect they have on others and their country
• those leaders who are not in power but strive to be
• the many possible qualities and attributes a ‘great’ leader might have.