Our choices are determined by experts and media personalities. How far do you agree?

For and against points for our choices are determined by experts and media personalities.

  • we are independent and can make our own decisions
  • experts can present technical and complex arguments that cannot be readily understood
  • the internet and electronic systems allow everyone access to goods from across the world, regardless of location
  • those in the media are prone to errors and inconsistencies that undermine their influence
  • art critics are less influential than friends and family in the choices we make
  • despite highly publicised campaigns, people still make consumer choices on price
  • celebrities can be very influential

How far do you agree that newspapers no longer contain news?

  • Article: The state of newspapers
  • news means different things to different people
  • many newspapers are published daily and report on daily events; magazines are usually published weekly or monthly
  • newspapers have to offer more than news if they are to compete with other news media such as the Internet and television
  • most newspapers report on at least the main news stories
  • most newspapers contain non-news items such as competitions, advertisements and TV listings
  • quality newspapers have a higher ratio of news-to-views columns than popular papers.

Consider the value of films and/or books which contain material intended to provoke or disturb.

Keywords: ‘consider’, ‘value’, ‘films’, ‘and/or’, ’books’, ‘provoke or disturb’

  • The film or book can be valuable if it is thought-provoking .
  • The value of a movie can be enhanced if it is done with the intention to educate and not to sensationalise.
  • It is important to define ‘disturbing’. Does disturbing equate to sexual, violent, language and horror images?
  • Is the film or book challenging ideologies to encourage discussion or change?
  • What about ‘based on true events.’ Such events could be horrific, disturbing or offensive but need to be shown so that the audience understands the issues.
  • How should content about holocaust, war or some kind of disaster be portrayed without disturbing content?
  • What about ‘disturbing’ for entertainment and shock value?
  • Value could disintegrate if done for sensationalism without attention to character/plot and skilful direction.
  • Some films can have unnecessary language. Language can be gratuitous but can be justified if that is part of the character’s world or environment.

‘It is not the singer but the song that counts.’ How far do you agree?

Keywords: ‘singer’ and ‘song’ and ‘How far’ and ‘agree’.

Musicals – songs linked with the plot e.g. Evita and Les Miserables show that the performance is more important than the song.
Classic songs covered by many but original singer captivates audiences, eg Elvis
Song-writing requires talent and creativity. Singing can be practiced and improved. Songs can be personal/emotional/universal in theme – people identify with them
The popularity of karaoke – singer entertains despite variable quality
Recognition of the need for a ‘good voice’ – ability to capture the emotions of words through pitch and tone. Hitting the right note is important for legedary songs, eg John Lenon’s Imagine
A singer could ruin the song
Melody or rhythm can be more important than the song

Today, with modern technology, not just journalists but everyone can create news. Discuss the effects of these developments.

Keywords: ‘modern technology’ and ‘everyone’ and ‘create’ and ‘journalists’ and ‘effects’.

Majority possess smartphones with integrated cameras – always accessible at any time
Instant access to the internet – share with the wider community
News as it happens (e.g. Arab Spring/London riots)
Increasing use by news channels/newspapers
Difficult to censor/control by political regimes
Spontaneous/honest/authentic
Often unverifiable/location can be unclear
Lacks professional commentary
Invaluable but needs analysis and editing, so a journalist view is necessary
People can communicate without the need for news channels
The voice of ordinary people can be heard
Fake news

‘Crime affects the whole of society, not just the immediate victims.’ Discuss.

  • Society can be defined as small groups. It is not necessary to view society as a big world.
  • Barometer of safety and security has to be maintained in a society.
  • Constant media coverage can instil fear among people.
  • Society’s monitoring of the victims of crime affects attitudes and confidence in the justice system
  • The impact of crime depends whether it is localised or happens in the same neighbourhood
  • It could also depend on whether the victims are known family, friends or neighbours
  • Society can view victims with indifference, as a reality show as if it couldn’t happen to them

“Social media divides us more than it unites us.” Do you agree?

Given how pervasive social media has become, it is indisputable that it can influence individuals. Social media wields the power to both divide and unites the community. While social media divides and has the potential to create rifts in society by perpetuating generational divide and creating echo chambers, it has an even greater potential to bring individuals together. It cuts across physical boundaries to unite different opinions and people. Social media sheds light on various otherwise unknown situations. Therefore, social media does not, in fact, divide more than unite.

From one perspective, social media perpetuates and exacerbates the generational gap between the older and the younger generations of today. Food, fashion, music and even relationships are guided by the trends on social media. The chasm between the young and the old is ever-growing due to social media. Thanks to social media, the young now have a vocabulary that is not easily understood by older people. Terms like woke, lit, awks and are host of other terms are just too dope for the older generation. In terms of world outlook and language, social media has divided people.

Avoiding a totally absolute view of the ability of social media, we have to acknowledge that social media facilitates the interaction of people across borders. Social media allows people to make new friends from different countries, as well as sustain relationships with friends and family who have moved overseas. Through sites like Tumblr and Instagram, friendships can be forged between diverse people. Critics opine that these links do not allow for a deeper understanding of other cultures, practices and ways of thinking. The connections are cursory at best. While social media has shrunk the world, it nevertheless has become an echo chamber and polarised view of people. The divisive nature of social media is shamefully sublime.

Fortunately, there are some small nuggets of positive experience through social media. It has helped unite the global community by shedding light on situations all around the world. With the ease of dissemination of information, netizens all around the world are not just able to glean insights into the struggles of others but are empowered to take action. For example, the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge started in the summer of 2014, raised $115 million for its cause. #MeToo Movement, #BlackLivesMatter, #YouAintNoMuslimBruv and a host of other movements have brought millions of people together, working to stamp out prejudice and discrimination. Social media has raised awareness about issues that society is confronted with and mobilizes people to act in the interest of their communities.

In essence, while social media may cause some rifts to occur within a society, its tendency to unite and bring people together is even greater. The availability of information online allows for more understanding and hence a more united world. As social media becomes part of everyday life, it will perform only one function, unite us in sociopolitical issues that matter far and wide.

To what extent do the newspapers and magazines that you read deal with what is trivial, rather than what is important?

            The printed pages in newspapers and magazines have come a long way since its modest beginnings. Nowadays, there is a good mix of publications catering to different consumer groups with different tastes and preferences. The more serious-minded, solemn and cultured crowd will champion their Economist and Wall Street Journal whereas whimsical and lurid reads such as the local Chinese newspaper Lian He Wan Bao satisfy another set of target audiences. With the ubiquitous presence of the traditional media in the form of print, it has come to play an important role amidst mundanity. Cantankerous media critics however, such as the ilk of Noam Chomsky, have accused falling editorial standards, trivialized content and alleged publishers bending to the winds of fickle consumers. This essay aims to communicate the possibility of coexistence of both entities of trivial content alongside the relatively important. Moreover, the extent of triviality and significance of content is quite subjective to one’s personal needs.

            There is a somewhat false dichotomy by preposing that trivial content has no importance whatsoever. It smacks of intellectual snobbery. There are demands for inane publications which would surely offend any strait-laced academic. After all as the old saying goes, one man’s Nylon is another man’s intellectual poison.  As highlighted above, the frivolity and pertinence of subject matter is idiosyncratic to an individual’s personal interests and profession. The topics of discussion in prints such as Martha Stewart Living are hardly ground-breaking or even important relative to events of war, destitution and natural disasters. Such subject matters may also be highly offensive to some in the light of the problems of the world. Newsweek’s special issue on lives of the affluent caught a lot of flack as it came smack in the middle of calamities in Myanmar and Sichuan. Yet there is a place still for publications that feature and focus on “superficial” material goodness. Such editorials should not be condemned as unimportant and trivial just because they are not wholly centred on conventionally more profound issues. We all need our little escapist joys in a world overshadowed by much toil and turmoil, be it reading about the delights of home décor or movie reviews.

            This brings us to the point that while triviality and importance remain prejudiced, what has become unacceptable and deserves much concern is how particular forces in today’s publishing world are trivialising the important. Capitalism has virtually single-handedly metamorphosed the world of newspapers and magazines. It has evolved increasingly into a public-owned, profit-driven and hard-nosed enterprise. There are some rare stalwarts of reputable and accountable prints financed by foundations with municipal pride who feel above the need to squeeze the last red cent out of their trade. Notwithstanding those firms, the hapless majority are of shareholder-wary corporations in a profit-orientated age who are not in the business of public education but mass-marketing products. To improve profit margins, coverage of important events is compromised such as by doing fewer cross-references which is time-consuming as well as costly. Therefore weighty material becomes trivialised.

            In addition, this spirit of economic competition means most editorial content is oriented around the public’s desire to be entertained rather than responsible reporting. Publications are primarily dominated by commercial needs so prints have to gain and maintain readership so as to survive and compete efficiently in a highly cutthroat industry, no matter its noblesse obligations. As a result of being profit-motivated, most publications now spin important content to maximise popular appeal that caters to the lowest common denominator. Important issues are still covered by publications but the spotlight rests upon the most puerile and relatively insignificant elements. The unholy trinity offerings of sex, violence and all things banal unfortunately feed the population’s increasing appetite for vicarious pleasure from the mundane and the stupid. Every facet of our media consumption seems catered to heightening people’s sensory experience with interesting snippets of amalgamation of gossip, scandal and sleaze. The mainstreaming and meshing of trivial and important contents in newspapers and magazines mean that the line between them is fading.

            Furthermore, new media has pressurised traditional publications to trivialise themselves. In retrospect, reporting used to rely solely on the perspective of professionals. Journalists were trained in schools to sharpen their discernment for factual accuracy. Nowadays, with an increased number of “eyes and ears” on the ground, information dissemination has become very different. Anyone with an internet connection can initiate an online newspaper or magazine. Unrestrained by reporter’s ethics and a cautious fact-checking editorial team, bloggers are excused for penning accusatorial but entertaining opinion pieces. The author of “The Vanishing Newspaper” as well as the masses who perpetuate this dismal outlook pin the blame on the decline in sales and audience numbers of mainstream prints on the Internet. At present, many distinctly prefer the casual, caustic and off-the-cuff reportage of new media, never mind its questionable origins or that it may be less than comprehensive, objective. Locally, The Straits Times has often roped in the likes of Jamie Yeo, Maia Lee, and Colin Goh to jumpstart interest in their publications amongst the youth.

            Generations have relied on and are still dependent upon the prints to inform the daily global happenings, which we otherwise would have a lack of reliable and accurate access to. Publications of newspapers and magazines have the ability to influence individuals and shape their opinions. Hence, it is disturbing to observe that the overall trend of publications including the most esteemed ones are heading towards frivolity and dumbing down cultures. The world of newspapers and magazines is being threatened by very real economic and cultural forces which call them to trivialise their material and lighten their approach for survival’s sake. As readers, we are in no position to judge the evolution of today’s publications unpretentiously because we form the exact market that is paying for what they are producing. Until a greater number of us demand a broader and deeper perspective on things, the printed pages will just continue featuring what we want.

‘In the modern world, image is everything.’ Discuss.

In the past century, the image has rapidly evolved from mere vanity to being regarded as of great importance in the modern world, where technology is ubiquitous and the concept of the image can be portrayed everywhere. An image is not merely the vivid representation of an individual or an object, but also a powerful tool manipulated by us to impress and entertain people, for self or for profit. Image is an important factor in society nowadays as it draws a line between the prominent people and the society’s unfashionable mob. It also separates the normal everyday products from high-end gadgets. While a good image is an eminently valued asset in today’s context and can help attain success to a certain extent, there are other elements that are just as important if not more important than it, such as substance. In today’s world, the image may seem like everything, however, where are many other aspects which are just as substantial that can lead to a successful life.

Over the years, with the introduction of print and visual media like newspapers and televisions, the role of images in the representation of ideas has changed significantly. The media plays a strong role in the dissemination of information in today’s modern society, and everyone has the equal ability to tap into the effectiveness of media to accomplish each’s own agenda. As media is accessible to almost every individual, it has led to a society that is easily influenced by images that the media portrays, deceiving them to desire something that they do not necessarily require. These images are the most prominently shown through the usage of advertisements by corporations to promote their own goods or services. Commercials and advertisements are designed in a way that captures the attention of the viewer in the shortest time possible, thus altering the perception of the individual according to what he sees. One good example of print media is women’s magazines, where beauty and especially fashion is heavily emphasized. Page after page, those magazines exude attractive advertisements of branded accessories, handbags, clothes, make-up and slimming centres. The need of looking elegant and classy has become so deeply entrenched in the modern societal psyche that many people, both man and women alike, are willing to fork out thousands of dollars to lavish themselves on expensive designer clothing, beauty treatments and products. Where looking fashionable is concerned, money is no object.


Reinforcing the fact that an individual comes under the influence of images every day, the amount of influence exerted on individuals is colossal. And more often than not, individuals succumb to the effect of these images. The massive amount of mass media portraying an ideal beauty causes people to internalize the standard definition of beauty and they take measures to attain the propagated ideal. This explains the fascination or even obsession with image and fashion, especially of celebrities. The American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery reports that, among the most prominent trends in 2007, about two-thirds of its members reported seeing men and women who requested cosmetic surgery because they wanted to remain competitive in the workplace. One such example is of Hajnal Ban who claimed that she was not taken seriously for her chosen profession of politics because of her height. Thus she had her legs surgically lengthened by 3 inches. This goes to show the number of pain women endures just to attain that desired image of themselves. There are also more movies and television shows that emphasize on an individual’s outlook appearance, such as 200 Pounds Beauty and Extreme Makeover, where the characters underwent various cosmetic surgeries to transform themselves into the ‘modern beauty’. To them, looking beautiful brings them confidence, and is their key to success. To them, image matters. Hence the viewer’s opinion is swayed to think the same way.

In the case of political parties and governments, it is common to see governments creating impressions to project a representation of the state of the country. In context, in North Korea, Kim Jung Il led citizens to believe that their country was thriving and prospering, when they were actually faced with poverty and famine due to government spending on nuclear weapons. Governments also tend to portray a good image of themselves to the people, such as the Prime Minister of Australia, who made a formal apology for the past wrongs caused by successive governments on the indigenous Aboriginal population. The apology, beamed live around the country on TV, was met with cheers. But however good that image is, he should back it up with substance, by putting his words into actions, like enforcing policies that would be of benefit to the aborigines’ community, instead of just appearing admirable. The previous President of the United States, President George Bush also painted an image of Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction, which resulted in the Iraq war. Moreover, that image has yet to be proven reality.

However, though it may seem that the concept of the perfect image is the only aspect which we all want to acquire, besides beauty and brawn, we are also sought after for something more valuable, such as knowledge and a good disposition. This is eminently shown in Singapore’s education system, where the character and achievements of a student are the most important criteria to enter into a higher level of education. Within the education system, students are not judged for their looks, and that is the purpose of the school uniform, to make every student look equal, not striking. The best way to be outstanding in an education system like Singapore’s is to have excellent conduct grades, academic and co-curricular achievements and thus be named a bright student with character and values. The importance of fulfilling these criteria is due to the significance of one’s testimonial that could help a student enter an institution, such as to a junior college, or university. In Singapore, there are also a group of people who are the cream of the crop and are highly regarded by our government. They are the elite. The elite does not just possess a good image, but the ability and knowledge as well which are undeniably important characteristics as they are shaped to lead the future of Singapore. In this manner, there is only a need for the appropriate image and not the perfect one.

Selecting the best candidates, especially those of high calibre, will result in a good government. A good and just government is one that portrays the true image of the state or is able to mould the state into its desired image, like a prosperous nation. Thus it is crucial to pick the right leaders, endowed with the capacity to think critically, that is able to lead a nation, and not just for appearance. To the government, pragmatism is regarded over the image, and more often than not, it is a matter of, “Can you deliver?” that is the burning question. This meticulous method of selection for Singapore has been highly successful, and there is no doubt about which party would win the elections each time. One of the main reasons for Singapore’s success is attributed to our state of political stability, and that we have trust in our leaders to maintain good governance in Singapore, corruption-free.

Prominent figures in the media are inevitably tasked with being a good role model to their viewers who are greatly influenced by their actions. After scrutinizing the appearance of a character or an actor, before the viewer subconsciously decides who to pick as his role model, the next thing he will look for in the media persona is for his character. It is unlikely for a child or a right-minded adult to choose an ill-mannered villain as his exemplar. However, though the actor could have started out as a presentable role model, with many others taking after him, once his character wanes, the others’ will follow suit. Such is shown by various Hollywood stars that have led many to degrade the importance of marriage by their multiple changes of partners. In another light, Jesse Jackson, an American civil rights activist and Baptist minister was an advisor for Bill Clinton, the then President of the United States. He was known to some as the most important black leader in politics at that time, and it is no doubt that many look up to him. Yet, in 2001, his affair with a staffer, Karin Stanford, was made public and that resulted in a blemish in his once clean profile, thus leading many to reconsider their perception of him. Others might even think that having extra-marital affairs is normal. If a Baptist minister could do it, why couldn’t they? Thus it is a huge responsibility to maintain the role of a good example, as the outlook is not all there is to it.

Media has changed the perception of the ideal body image to masculine men and immaculately groomed and slim women. Especially for women, where the mass media promotes unrealistic and unhealthy bodies of painfully thin women, encouraging many girls that it is the ideal way to look. Research indicates that exposure to images of thin, young, air-brushed female bodies is linked to depression, loss of self-esteem and the development of unhealthy eating habits in women and girls. The American research group Anorexia Nervosa & Related Eating Disorders, Inc. says that one out of every four college-aged women uses unhealthy methods of weight control – including fasting, skipping meals excessive exercise, laxative abuse and self-induced vomiting (Bulimia). There were several cases of models fainting, and in some cases dying, because of the extremity of their eating disorders, but it was only after such horrific events that fashion industries decided to do something about the situation. Italy and Spain have since banned super skinny models from the runway and requires the models to have a body mass index of at least 18.5. In 2004, Dove, a large company in the health product and beauty sector, released a series of print and television ads featuring happy-looking, lingerie-clad women with “everyday” looks, called the Dove Beauties. Dove’s campaign was striving to generate change from within the generally weight-conscious advertisement industry, showing that you are beautiful in your own way. Through these examples, it proves that a person might have good looks, but without health and contentment of the way one looks, it is difficult to live a self-fulfilling and happy life.

Through the years, the image has changed, especially after the emergence of the media, which has led many to misunderstand the concept of real beauty. The ideal image that the media portrayed has drastically changed the individual’s opinion. Leading to the countless effort spent on attaining that perfect image, deluding people from what is the main priority in life. Governments have also been known to paint the perfect image of their nation, coaxing their people into believing the untrue. However, in some cases, the substance is more sought after than beauty. This is evident in various institutions and the recruitment of future leaders where ability and personality are of the utmost importance. A bad image from the media can also lead to various followers, resulting in declining statistics significantly in the area of marriage. And lastly, the most essential thing to possess in life is health. A person might be the richest and most beautiful in the world, but without health, he is nothing. In conclusion, albeit it may seem that image is everything in today’s world, it is not so, particularly where the substance is concerned.

Are entertainment celebrities worthy idols or bad Influence?

Entertainment celebrities have become an intricate part of our daily lives. We see them on television, hear them on radios and even read about them in newspapers and magazines. With media exerting considerable influence in our everyday lives, so have entertainment celebrities who utilise the media to gain popularity. Some people may argue that the influence has led to a positive effect on our everyday lives while others say they have detrimental consequences on our daily lives. In this essay, I will present both points of argument before finally explaining why in my opinion entertainment celebrities are more of a bad influence rather than worthy idols. 

Idols exert a bad influence on people as they instil wrong values into people’s mindsets such as having good looks are imperative. This is due to the popular portrayal of entertainment celebrities by the media as extremely appealing. The media also portrays beauty as being the norm. This has caused people to increasingly pursue good looks by means such as plastic surgery. Statistics have shown a rise in the cases of youth undergoing plastic surgery. Not only plastic surgery is highly unnatural it also causes potential risk with the possibility of adverse side effects. A greater emphasis has also been placed on outer instead of inner beauty. This has led to a vainer society which pursues beauty instead of higher moral standards. 

Entertainment celebrities have also been shown to display undesirable traits such as dabbling with drugs or promiscuity. One such example would be Lindsay Lohan who has been known to consume drugs and is frequently placed in rehabilitation centres. Another example would be of famous pop Idols such as Britney Spears or Lady Gaga who actively promote sexuality through their songs and music videos. We may well be subconsciously picking up these traits just by listening to our MP3 or through other portals of media. 

In addition, entertainment celebrities can lead to an unhealthy obsession of people towards their idols. For example, recently a Korean pop concert held in Singapore saw an unprecedented number of youth attending the event although it was close to the examination period. This shows how youth are willing to forgo their studies to watch their idols perform. This has also led to worship by fans and various cults put in place in reverence of these celebrities. We are simply forgetting that entertainment celebrities are not exceptional nor special, they are normal human beings just like you and me.

However, entertainment celebrities cannot be said to be totally bad influences as there are certain aspects to them that make them worthy idols. They add colour and zest into our otherwise boring and dull lives. For example, comedians help to relieve stress and make people happy. Entertainment celebrities have also helped to spread culture through popular media such as soap operas. For example, recently aired drama “The Little Nonya” helped to reignite popular interest in Nonya culture. This has led to an increased awareness in traditions and customs that might have been long forgotten. But conversely, entertainment celebrities have also caused erosion of culture. For example, popular television dramas from the US such as the Vampire Diaries have caused people to become more interested in foreign culture instead of local cultures due to better appeal. This may be dangerous as youths are increasingly forgetting their roots and cultural essence in favour of foreign culture. 

On the other hand, entertainment celebrities have also instilled important morals into people’s minds through popular dramas, for example, growing up, highlight important life lessons. Historical dramas inform people about important past events to remind people not to commit similar mistakes and also to edify people more on history and to spark an interest in learning history. However, due to the desire to grasp the attention of audiences, historical dramas may distort facts and are melodramatic leading to inaccuracies and imparting of false facts. 

In conclusion, I feel that entertainment celebrities are a bad influence as they impart the wrong values in people and cause an unhealthy obsession among fans. Their visual appeal only serves to boost people’s vanity in the pursuit of unattainable perfection in beauty. People should always remember that entertainment celebrities are only humans and certainly not the complete guiding light as to how we will lead our lives.