Poetry has little to no value today. Discuss.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: In an age dominated by digital media and rapid communication, poetry often seems like a relic of the past.
  • Background: Brief overview of poetry’s historical significance and its current status in modern culture.
  • Thesis Statement: Despite claims that poetry holds little value in contemporary society due to its perceived irrelevance and diminishing readership, it continues to offer profound cultural, educational, and emotional benefits that validate its enduring significance.

II. Supporting View 1: Perceived Irrelevance

  • Topic Sentence: Critics argue that poetry is increasingly irrelevant in today’s fast-paced world.
  • Example 1: The decline in poetry book sales and readership statistics, such as reports from the Publishers Association highlighting lower sales figures compared to other genres.
  • Example 2: The reduction of poetry in school curriculums in favour of more utilitarian subjects like STEM, as evidenced by changes in the UK’s National Curriculum.
  • Analysis: Discuss how these trends reflect a societal shift away from valuing poetry, contributing to the perception of its diminished importance.

III. Supporting View 2: Diminishing Readership

  • Topic Sentence: The readership of poetry is diminishing, leading to questions about its relevance and value.
  • Example 1: Surveys showing that a smaller percentage of the population regularly reads poetry compared to other forms of literature, such as novels or non-fiction.
  • Example 2: The closure of several renowned poetry magazines and journals due to lack of subscriptions and financial support, indicating waning interest.
  • Analysis: Examine how these examples highlight the challenges poetry faces in maintaining a significant presence in contemporary literary culture.

IV. Opposing View 1: Cultural and Educational Value

  • Topic Sentence: Poetry continues to offer substantial cultural and educational value in modern society.
  • Example 1: The success of initiatives like National Poetry Day in the UK, which celebrates poetry’s role in culture and education and engages people of all ages.
  • Example 2: The incorporation of poetry into therapeutic and educational programmes, such as Poetry Therapy, which uses verse to promote mental health and literacy.
  • Analysis: Discuss how these examples illustrate poetry’s ongoing relevance and its ability to enrich cultural and educational experiences.

V. Opposing View 2: Emotional and Social Impact

  • Topic Sentence: Poetry remains a powerful medium for emotional expression and social commentary.
  • Example 1: The popularity of contemporary poets like Rupi Kaur and Amanda Gorman, whose works resonate with wide audiences and address pressing social issues.
  • Example 2: The use of poetry in social movements and protests, such as the #MeToo movement, where poetry has been employed to articulate experiences and inspire change.
  • Analysis: Explore how these instances demonstrate poetry’s capacity to connect with people emotionally and drive social discourse, underscoring its lasting value.

VI. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: While poetry faces challenges related to perceived irrelevance and diminishing readership, its cultural, educational, and emotional contributions affirm its continued importance in modern society.
  • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views discussed.
  • Final Thought: Emphasise the need to recognise and support poetry’s unique ability to enrich human experience and foster deeper understanding in an increasingly complex world.

Evaluate the importance of ‘the hero/heroine’ to readers of fiction books.

Points of discussion for the importance of the hero/heroine to readers of fiction

  • consider the importance of ‘the hero’ to readers of fiction books
  • show an understanding of other appealing elements of fiction books to their readers
  • make a judgement, based on consideration of the evidence and argument put forward.
  • ‘the hero’ having ideal qualities which the fiction reader can admire and attempt to emulate
  • ‘the hero’ being engaging and likeable, so the reader is carried along with the story, caring about the outcome
  • heroic actions or characters may be lacking in the reader’s daily life, so fiction fills the gap
  • heroes of children’s literature, in particular, teaching universal moral lessons and acting as role models
  • ‘the hero’, for example in tragedy, may have a ‘fatal flaw’ and thus be fascinating, realistic and relatable
  • villains or anti-heroes being more appealing, interesting and engaging, depending on the genre or setting
  • heroes not always being fully believable, with idealised behaviour, thoughts and actions
  • other elements of fictional books may appeal to readers more.

Account for the popularity of biographies and autobiographies.

Possible points for the popularity of biographies and autobiographies

Celebrity obsession
Preoccupation with reality TV and instant fame
• Interest in the lives of others (e.g. the popularity of blogging)
• Celebrities are quick to exploit
• Expansion of multi-media biography channels on cable TV
• Popular films based on the lives of famous people
• Everyone exposing their personal lives on social networking sites
• Escapism/desire for sensational lifestyles

“Literature is useless in a pragmatic world.” Do you agree with this view?

In many societies, today literature is considered useless as it provides with no economic benefits. In pragmatist societies, people are concerned with economic growth and progress at an individual and national level. In such society’s importance is given more to practical subjects like mathematics and science which are key to getting high paying jobs. For example, by studying mathematics and science people can breakthrough in fields such as engineering, data analytics and medicine. Literature, on the other hand, does not provide any such economic benefits. It is believed that the one who studies literature would end up struggling or becoming a writer which is a high-risk job. Such a mindset towards literature is the primary reason why literature is considered useless in a pragmatic world. After all, we need more computer engineers, accountants and software developers in this competitive world. Studying literature does not contribute to any of these essential skills and thus is useless in a pragmatic world.

In our practical world today, more emphasis is being placed on subjects like Science and mathematics. Pragmatists believe that for building a strong economy people should be adept at these subjects. This stems from the fact that subjects like science and mathematics are required and given more preference even in the job market. When it comes to Literature, pragmatists believe that it is a pointless subject that does not offer any insights into the real world. For them, knowledge of scientific theories and geometric theorems is more important than the knowledge of Shakespeare’s plays and Auden’s war poetry. However, disagreeing with this view it can be contended that literature is still relevant and useful in a pragmatic world because it holds historical value, provides us with a wealth of knowledge and helps engage with diverse cultural perspectives.

However, terming literature as useless based on the economic benefits is reductive. The usefulness of literature does not rely on whether it provides people with high-paying jobs or successful careers. Literature is useful because it provides people with an opportunity to look at things from broader perspectives. It provides people with an infinite source of knowledge which is instrumental in enriching the lifestyles and mindset of the people living within the society.

Literature provides insights into the human mind and allows people to empathize with various situations. The study of literature allows people to understand other people’s feelings which helps people to connect to various aspects of different regions, races, societies, and periods of time. Literary works provide a variety of genres and themes that are applicable to daily lives. For example, To Kill a Mocking bird gives readers insights into issues like race and justice from the perspective of a child. The book leads readers to empathise with the characters and teaches them a lesson of morality.  Similarly, works of Shakespeare are instrumental in understanding human nature. His plays like Macbeth and Hamlet provide valuable insights into the psyche of the characters. Literature is helpful in providing a broad view of society, through the eyes of the characters. Literature in this sense is not useless as it fosters understanding, tolerance and empathy values that are important in today’s pragmatic world.

Literature is also important as it allows us to understand the nuances of language. In the technological world where people use contractions and chat language to communicate it is essential to understand the language. Literature leads to enrichment of the language, people by reading and analysing works of literature can learn about syntax, vocabulary and writing styles. Classical works of George Orwell, William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens can help people understand the evolution of language. Literary structures, trends, the way views are expressed within these works bring awareness about language developments and can lead to a better understanding of language in the current context. These language skills that are built by the study of literature can help people to become confident and use language in academic as well as social settings. For example, use of language can help them in writing academic essays and while stepping in the job world it can help them write convincing cover letters and drafting emails. Thus, literature has practical use in society and to deem it as useless is because of the deeply entrenched misconceptions about its utility. Thus, the study of literature is useful in the pragmatic world because it has practical uses.

Lastly, literature has an entertaining value that can help readers escape from the shackles of their mundane lives. In a pragmatic world, people are in a constant rat race to outdo each other, such struggle leads to stress that is inevitable. Reading works of literature can provide people with the necessary respite from their stressful lives. By reading literature we can dive into different realms and let our imagination run free. For example, by reading JK Rowling’s Harry Potter, people can be a part of that universe and imagine themselves to be using wands and invisibility cloaks. Similarly, by reading Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, people can imagine themselves rafting through the Mississippi River with Huck and Jim. Such escapism helps people in forgetting about the stress in their lives even if for a moment. Thus, in this pragmatic world where stress is inevitable, literature provides the much-needed entertainment and escapism and hence cannot be deemed as useless.

In conclusion, literature is useful in this pragmatic world. While economic growth and progress are important, it cannot be denied that literature holds an intrinsic value today. Literature provides the necessary knowledge, entertainment, fosters creativity and offers an escape for readers. In this way, literature is not useless but is essential for enriching our lives in more ways than one.

Assess whether traditional stories, with which you are familiar, have any relevance to the modern world.

Points for assessing whether traditional stories have any relevance to the modern world.

• Most traditional stories have universal themes (good v evil, heroism, deception and betrayal, identity) which are relevant today
• Need to adapt character/setting to a modern setting
• Can the cultural context be maintained? (cultures do develop and change)
Makes them accessible to new audiences
• How do you update the social/historic context?
• Identify the subtle/moral teachings within the story
• Updating could lose the folklore tone/atmosphere
• Often the setting remains traditional but the language is modernised or becomes a pantomime (traditional)/a musical
• As in oral traditions modernising can keep the story alive/in the modern consciousness

The pen is mightier than the sword. Do you agree?

Words have become the balm that has been used to soothe the masses, not violent intervention.

The pen is mightier than the sword is a metonymic adage that has been used for centuries. While many have advocated the power of the sword, it cannot be denied that the pen holds significant power as well. The written word has transformed socioeconomic and political landscapes. Thus, it remains true that the written word is more powerful than the strength of weapons. 

Forceful or armed intervention helps a totalitarian or dictatorial government to intimidate the masses into submission.  The use of force or intimidation does not require deep reasoning. According to supporters of violence, violence is better because it gives immediate results and destroys opponents. An example of this can be Jamal Khashoggi who was killed in a rogue operation because he criticised the policies of Saudi Crown Prince, Prince Mohammed, through his column in the Washington Post. Similarly, in Northwest China, libraries burnt books that did not align religiously and politically to the communist ideologies of the PRC party. These incidents show how people fear the power of the pen and use the “sword” mercilessly to silence them.

Though it might seem that the “sword” holds significant power, the profound impact of the pen should not be forgotten. For example, in China, Mao Zedong was deeply influenced by the writings of Karl Marx. The impact of Marx’s view led to the communist revolution in China. Similarly, many books and written words have provided us look into deeper ideas like colonialism and post-colonialism. For example, Edward Said’s book Orientalism evaluated and criticised western beliefs about oriental people and formed an important ground for post-colonial studies. Adolf Hitler’s autobiographical book, Mein Kampf, disseminated his ideologies to a large audience. Therefore, the pen has the power to influence human thought and behaviour inefficient ways without violence.

Supporters of violence often argue that words mean nothing if a nation cannot protect itself from external military forces. For example, literature did not help to stop violence against Black Americans. Thinking retrospectively, literature was of little use when the German military invaded Poland or when Malaysia was attacked by the Japanese forces.  One could surmise that when military power is strong, words are of little use. Military forces in this instance can destroy societies and culture and also replace the existing literature with something new.

The power of the pen has morphed into the power of social media. Governments have been formed and finished by the swift stroke of the keyboard. In modern times, the pen manifests itself as Twitter feeds, Instagram posts and some even suggest, Tik Tok videos. The power of the pen is seen in hashtags that give further boost to causes and challenges that societies want to surmount. The Arab Sping, Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter and the MeToo movement area all examples of how the pen has been able to show its mettle in the form of words, and actions. The world is less violent now and conflicts mostly regional.

Even today, the pen is mightier than the sword. Many problems of the world find a solution in the written word and do not require the display of might. In the end, might can only oppresses and can only lead to superficial success and sooner or later will find itself challenged by the written word.  Words have become the balm that has been used to soothe the masses, not violent intervention.

‘Today, the content of what is written is more important than grammatical accuracy.’ To what extent is this true?

  • Social media is often about the conversation so a ‘chatty’ style might be more appropriate
  • Understanding the code in texting abbreviations is more important than grammatical accuracy
  • Writing is disposable (emails can be a series of notes giving information which are then deleted; grammatical accuracy is unimportant)
  • Some forms of social media reduce commentary and conversations to brief phrases
  • No time for punctuation or capital letters as it is quick exchanges which are important
  • Understanding does require correct grammar
  • Depends on the audience and degree of formality (newspapers tend to be accurate so as not to distract from the content

Studying literature is useless and cannot be transferred to everyday life. Discuss.

  • Studying literature develops critical analysis
  • Brings about empathy
  • Readers learn communication
  • Organisation of ideas becomes easier
  • Transferrable to employment (suggests intelligence, ability to organise/think deeply, skills to conduct presentations/seminars, skills to communicate)
  • Understand a variety of reactions, personalities, attitudes and situations in everyday life
  • To read and evaluate anything written
  • Skills can be specialised needing to understand and use technical terms (identify figures of speech, symbolism, poetic techniques, the nuances and ambiguities of language etc.)
  • Wider messages/value
  • Appreciation of historical context

To what extent are Shakespeare’s works still relevant today?

Keywords: ‘To what extent …?’ and ‘still relevant’.

• Shakespeare keeps the reader/listener engaged: explores pertinent issues: challenges thoughts/opinions: plot, characters and themes are cleverly interwoven: emerging themes and ideas are timeless
• human flaws/faults, dilemmas and relationships transcend time
• characters being human is fallible, e.g. Macbeth being too ambitious and Hamlet struggling to come to terms with the death of his father
• love, friendship, betrayal and vengeance are timeless themes
• a voice is given to those marginalised in society, e.g. females in the later sixteenth/early seventeenth century
• the enrichment of the English language, e.g. Shakespeare is the most quoted author in the Oxford dictionary
• examples: ‘all’s well that ends well’, ‘the world is my oyster’ and ‘parting is such sweet sorrow’
• the entertainment value and range of subject matter, e.g. war, religious conflict, racial prejudice, class division