How far has music, art or theatre influenced your outlook on the world?

Points for music, art or theatre influenced your outlook on the world.

• “the world” may be interpreted in several ways; an international, local, intellectual or
• music, art or theatre from a philosophical perspective
• Gender, generation, political leanings, may be relevant
The influences may be external; concerts, galleries, visits to the theatre
• The influences may come from home entertainment; CDs, Internet, TV, Radio
• Without examples the higher mark bands cannot be accessed
• Allow various art forms; dance, ballet, film for example
• Consider commenting on lack of access to a wider culture
• Evaluate the effect of personal experiences on how to view the world is shaped

To what extent can sport foster a sense of community beyond the events themselves?

Possible points for can sport foster a sense of community beyond the events.

• The Olympic spirit
Encouragement of harmless patriotism
• Antidote to racism and other forms of discrimination
• Informal opportunities for world leaders to meet
• Can be a spur to economic development
Encourages sharing of enthusiasms and interests
• Can produce appalling forms of exploitation
• Can engender xenophobia and hooliganism
• Can provide opportunities for unscrupulous politicians
• May result in feelings of national humiliation
• Adds to the dominance of strong nations
• Is an expensive distraction

The world faces many global challenges. Choose one, and explain why it ought to be taken more seriously.

Possible points for the world faces many global challenges

The gap between the rich and the poor
• Environmental issues; oceans, air pollution and so on
• Religious conflicts
• Nuclear and/or chemical warfare
• The world faces many global challenges in form of various health issues – for example, decreasing efficacy of antibiotics
• Extinction of species
• Population growth
• Cyberattacks
• Illiteracy
Tensions between developed and less developed countries/regions
• The drugs’ trade
• Migration


The question asks for one challenge to be identified. This challenge should be clearly stated but that does NOT preclude mention of related matters. The list of challenges cited above is not exhaustive and there may be other equally valid examples used in the essay.

‘Noise pollution is a real threat to the quality of life.’ To what extent is this true in your country?

Points for and against noise pollution is a real threat

• Depends on living environment (busy road/noisy neighbours/apartment living/flight paths/night-time noise/dog barking)
• Noise pollution is a real threat as it can cause stress/depression
Whether the noise is constant or intermittent
• Whether there are any enforceable laws
• Examples from your country
• It could be that air pollution is a greater threat, particularly in large cities (wearing protective masks)
• Some people might think noise enhances ‘quality of life’ (night-club/sporting events)
• Depends on personal tolerance

Scorpion venom may be used to cure cancer in the future. Evaluate the importance of species’ preservation.

Points for/against importance of species’ preservation.

• Their edibility; good for the environment, improve animal welfare, reduces the risk of disease in humans
• Reduces the need to provide animal feed
• Insects produce more protein at a lower cost both to the environment and to our pocket
• To feed cattle we need grain, fertiliser, land, and water
• Insects can be fed with our own waste products
• Importance of species’ preservation can help to reduce greenhouse gases
• Insects do not require an abundance of water
• Improvement in animal welfare – killing insects humanely is easy
• We do not have so much in common with insects as other species – therefore reduced risk of disease – swine flu, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease etc.
• Danger of ingesting pesticides
• Dealing with the disgust factor
• Pollination
• Dealing with the mosquito
Good for food security
Antibacterial properties of honey
• The venom of a tarantula is more environmentally effective than conventional insecticides
• Centipede venom as an alternative to morphine

“Literature is useless in a pragmatic world.” Do you agree with this view?

In many societies, today literature is considered useless as it provides with no economic benefits. In pragmatist societies, people are concerned with economic growth and progress at an individual and national level. In such society’s importance is given more to practical subjects like mathematics and science which are key to getting high paying jobs. For example, by studying mathematics and science people can breakthrough in fields such as engineering, data analytics and medicine. Literature, on the other hand, does not provide any such economic benefits. It is believed that the one who studies literature would end up struggling or becoming a writer which is a high-risk job. Such a mindset towards literature is the primary reason why literature is considered useless in a pragmatic world. After all, we need more computer engineers, accountants and software developers in this competitive world. Studying literature does not contribute to any of these essential skills and thus is useless in a pragmatic world.

In our practical world today, more emphasis is being placed on subjects like Science and mathematics. Pragmatists believe that for building a strong economy people should be adept at these subjects. This stems from the fact that subjects like science and mathematics are required and given more preference even in the job market. When it comes to Literature, pragmatists believe that it is a pointless subject that does not offer any insights into the real world. For them, knowledge of scientific theories and geometric theorems is more important than the knowledge of Shakespeare’s plays and Auden’s war poetry. However, disagreeing with this view it can be contended that literature is still relevant and useful in a pragmatic world because it holds historical value, provides us with a wealth of knowledge and helps engage with diverse cultural perspectives.

However, terming literature as useless based on the economic benefits is reductive. The usefulness of literature does not rely on whether it provides people with high-paying jobs or successful careers. Literature is useful because it provides people with an opportunity to look at things from broader perspectives. It provides people with an infinite source of knowledge which is instrumental in enriching the lifestyles and mindset of the people living within the society.

Literature provides insights into the human mind and allows people to empathize with various situations. The study of literature allows people to understand other people’s feelings which helps people to connect to various aspects of different regions, races, societies, and periods of time. Literary works provide a variety of genres and themes that are applicable to daily lives. For example, To Kill a Mocking bird gives readers insights into issues like race and justice from the perspective of a child. The book leads readers to empathise with the characters and teaches them a lesson of morality.  Similarly, works of Shakespeare are instrumental in understanding human nature. His plays like Macbeth and Hamlet provide valuable insights into the psyche of the characters. Literature is helpful in providing a broad view of society, through the eyes of the characters. Literature in this sense is not useless as it fosters understanding, tolerance and empathy values that are important in today’s pragmatic world.

Literature is also important as it allows us to understand the nuances of language. In the technological world where people use contractions and chat language to communicate it is essential to understand the language. Literature leads to enrichment of the language, people by reading and analysing works of literature can learn about syntax, vocabulary and writing styles. Classical works of George Orwell, William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens can help people understand the evolution of language. Literary structures, trends, the way views are expressed within these works bring awareness about language developments and can lead to a better understanding of language in the current context. These language skills that are built by the study of literature can help people to become confident and use language in academic as well as social settings. For example, use of language can help them in writing academic essays and while stepping in the job world it can help them write convincing cover letters and drafting emails. Thus, literature has practical use in society and to deem it as useless is because of the deeply entrenched misconceptions about its utility. Thus, the study of literature is useful in the pragmatic world because it has practical uses.

Lastly, literature has an entertaining value that can help readers escape from the shackles of their mundane lives. In a pragmatic world, people are in a constant rat race to outdo each other, such struggle leads to stress that is inevitable. Reading works of literature can provide people with the necessary respite from their stressful lives. By reading literature we can dive into different realms and let our imagination run free. For example, by reading JK Rowling’s Harry Potter, people can be a part of that universe and imagine themselves to be using wands and invisibility cloaks. Similarly, by reading Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, people can imagine themselves rafting through the Mississippi River with Huck and Jim. Such escapism helps people in forgetting about the stress in their lives even if for a moment. Thus, in this pragmatic world where stress is inevitable, literature provides the much-needed entertainment and escapism and hence cannot be deemed as useless.

In conclusion, literature is useful in this pragmatic world. While economic growth and progress are important, it cannot be denied that literature holds an intrinsic value today. Literature provides the necessary knowledge, entertainment, fosters creativity and offers an escape for readers. In this way, literature is not useless but is essential for enriching our lives in more ways than one.

‘Religious education should be a part of the school curriculum.’ Discuss.

Points for/against religious education should be a part of the school curriculum

Religion should be taught in the home, not at school
• Some countries go by the principle of separation of church and state
• Religious education can lead to segregation and stereotyping
• Not all families are religious
• Time could be spent on other subjects
• Does not always meet the needs of a multicultural society
• Children could be taught in ways that disturb their own legitimate beliefs
• Some parents send their children to “faith schools” in spite of not being religious themselves.
These schools sometimes have the reputation of being well-disciplined and promoting high
achievement
• It can increase divisions in a community and a nation
• Perhaps the teaching of ethics and morals, as an alternative
• The local place of worship can provide education, out of school hours
Knowledge of different religions can develop a greater understanding of others