Tag: Social Issues

Sport is organised play. Is this a fair comment?

I. Introduction

Hook: Structured strategies, systematic schedules, and spirited spectacles define sport.
Background: The nature of sport involves both play and organised structure. This duality sparks debate on its true essence.
Thesis Statement: Sport is organised play as it encompasses more than mere recreation, involving cultural, economic, and social dimensions.

II. Supporting View 1: Structured Nature of Sports

Topic Sentence: Sport is organised play as it inherently involves structure and rules, making them organised play.
Example 1: The Tokyo 2020 Olympics’ meticulous planning and regulations.
The Guardian: Showcased strict schedules and comprehensive rule enforcement. (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/tokyo-2020-olympics)
Example 2: The English Premier League’s organised fixtures and regulatory framework.
BBC: Highlighted the detailed scheduling and governance of the league. (https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/english-premier-league)
Example 3: The Euro 2020 football tournament’s strategic and rule-bound matches.
Reuters: Emphasised the structured competition and strategic play. (https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/euro-2020-soccer-tournament-2021-06-11/)

The structured nature of sports supports the view that they are organised play. Thus, the inherent structure in sports validates the claim of organised play.

III. Supporting View 2: Recreational Aspect of Sports

Topic Sentence: Sports retain a fundamental element of play and recreation.
Example 1: Community-level football in Spain emphasising enjoyment over competition.
El País: Focused on the recreational enjoyment of local football. (https://elpais.com/deportes/futbol-amateur)
Example 2: Recreational cricket leagues in India.
The Hindu: Highlighted the playful and enjoyable aspect of cricket. (https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/recreational-cricket-leagues-in-india/article32965484.ece)
Example 3: Local rugby matches in New Zealand.
New Zealand Herald: Showcased the fun and community engagement in local rugby. (https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby-grassroots-level)

The recreational aspect of sports underscores their nature as organised play. Hence, the enjoyment derived from sports supports the organised play perspective.

IV. Supporting View 3: Sport as a Leisure Activity

Topic Sentence: Many engage in sports primarily as a leisure activity, supporting the organised play notion.
Example 1: Cycling as a popular leisure activity in France.
Le Monde: Focused on the leisure aspect of cycling tours. (https://www.lemonde.fr/sport/velo)
Example 2: Recreational swimming clubs in Australia.
ABC News: Emphasised swimming as a leisure pursuit. (https://www.abc.net.au/news/recreational-swimming-australia)
Example 3: Social tennis leagues in the UK.
The Guardian: Highlighted tennis as a leisure and social activity. (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/social-tennis-leagues)

The leisure aspect of sports aligns with the organised play concept. Therefore, engaging in sports for leisure supports the organised play argument.

V. Opposing View 1: Economic Impact of Sports

Topic Sentence: The significant economic impact of sports transcends the notion of mere organised play.
Example 1: Financial success of the Premier League.
BBC: Highlighted the league’s massive economic contributions. (https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/financial-impact-premier-league)
Example 2: The economic boost from the Tokyo 2020 Olympics.
Reuters: Emphasised the Olympics’ economic benefits to Japan. (https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/tokyo-2020-olympics-economic-impact-2021-08-09/)
Example 3: Revenue generation from IPL in India.
The Hindu: Focused on the financial gains from the Indian Premier League. (https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cricket/ipl-economic-impact-2021/article36104528.ece)

The economic dimensions of sports suggest they are more than organised play. Thus, the economic impact challenges the notion of sports as mere organised play.

VI. Opposing View 2: Sports as a Tool for Social Change

Topic Sentence: Sports act as a significant tool for social change, surpassing the organised play label.
Example 1: Marcus Rashford’s campaign for free school meals in the UK.
BBC: Demonstrated sports figures driving social policies. (https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-marcus-rashford-campaign-2020)
Example 2: Sports’ role in anti-racism movements in Europe.
Reuters: Showcased sports influencing social justice. (https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/anti-racism-movements-europe-2020-06-09/)
Example 3: Naomi Osaka’s mental health advocacy.
The Guardian: Highlighted sports promoting mental health awareness. (https://www.theguardian.com/sport/naomi-osaka-mental-health)

The role of sports in social change extends beyond organised play. Therefore, sports’ societal influence contradicts the organised play argument.

VII. Opposing View 3: Cultural Significance of Sports

Topic Sentence: The cultural significance of sports transcends the organised play concept.
Example 1: Cultural impact of cricket in India.
The Hindu: Highlighted cricket’s deep cultural roots in India. (https://www.thehindu.com/sport/cultural-impact-of-cricket-india)
Example 2: Rugby’s cultural significance in New Zealand.
New Zealand Herald: Emphasised rugby’s importance in national identity. (https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/rugby-cultural-significance-new-zealand)
Example 3: Football’s role in European culture.
Reuters: Showcased football’s cultural influence in Europe. (https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sports/football-cultural-significance-europe)

The cultural importance of sports challenges the organised play perspective. Thus, the cultural significance of sports refutes the notion of them as mere organised play.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While sport is organised play, it also involves economic, social, and cultural dimensions.
Summary of Key Points: Structured nature, recreational aspect, leisure activity vs. economic impact, social change, cultural significance.
Final Thought: A comprehensive understanding of sports reveals they are more than just organised play.

A nation’s right to sovereignty takes precedence over human rights. Do you agree?

Prioritising human rights over sovereignty is essential.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: A nation’s sovereignty must not overshadow the fundamental rights of individuals.
  • Background: Overview of the tension between national sovereignty and human rights.
  • Thesis Statement: While sovereignty is crucial, it should not take precedence over human rights, as human rights ensure justice and dignity for all.

II. Supporting View 1: Importance of Sovereignty for Independence

III. Supporting View 2: Sovereignty in National Security

IV. Supporting View 3: Sovereignty in Cultural Preservation

V. Opposing View 1: Human Rights as Universal Standards

VI. Opposing View 2: International Accountability

VII. Opposing View 3: Long-term Peace and Stability

VIII. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: While sovereignty is crucial, it should not take precedence over human rights, as human rights ensure justice and dignity for all.
  • Summary of Key Points: Sovereignty for independence, security, and culture versus universal human rights, international accountability, long-term stability.
  • Final Thought: Balancing sovereignty with human rights is essential for global justice and enduring peace.

The sole purpose of any multi-national company is to maximise returns to its shareholders. Do you agree?

While maximising returns to shareholders is a primary purpose of multi-national companies (MNCs), they also increasingly focus on social responsibility, sustainability, and stakeholder value.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: Multi-national companies exist solely to enrich their shareholders. Why else would they be multi-national?
  • Background: Overview of the traditional role of MNCs and evolving perspectives.
  • Thesis Statement: Maximising shareholder returns is crucial for MNCs, but they also focus on social responsibility, sustainability, and stakeholder value.

II. Supporting View 1: Maximising Shareholder Returns

III. Supporting View 2: Financial Performance Focus

IV. Supporting View 3: Regulatory Compliance for Profit

V. Opposing View 1: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

VI. Opposing View 2: Stakeholder Value Focus

VII. Opposing View 3: Ethical Business Practices

VIII. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: Maximising shareholder returns is crucial for MNCs, but they also focus on social responsibility, sustainability, and stakeholder value.
  • Summary of Key Points: Shareholder returns, financial performance, regulatory compliance versus CSR, stakeholder value, ethical practices.
  • Final Thought: Balancing profit with ethical and social responsibilities is essential for sustainable success in the modern business environment.

Desperate times call for desperate measures. To what extent is it justifiable for governments to adopt this approach?

While adopting desperate measures can be justified in extreme situations to ensure public safety and stability, it risks undermining democratic principles, human rights, and long-term societal trust. Ethics can be the guiding light.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: The end justifies the means. In times of crisis, government actions be justified.
  • Background: Overview of government responses to emergencies.
  • Thesis Statement: Desperate measures can be justified in extreme situations but risk undermining democratic principles, human rights, and long-term trust.

II. Supporting View 1: Ensuring Public Safety

  • Topic Sentence: Adopting desperate measures at times is justified to ensure public safety in extreme crises.
  • Example 1: New Zealand’s strict COVID-19 lockdown (2020-2021). Strict lockdown measures curbed virus spread effectively (source: BBC, 2020).
  • Example 2: Australia’s bushfire emergency response (2019-2020). Government enforced evacuations and firebreaks to protect lives (source: The Guardian, 2020). https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jan/06/australian-bushfires-what-did-the-government-do
  • Example 3: Italy’s stringent earthquake measures (2016-2021).
    • Analysis: In extreme situations, urgent measures are necessary to protect public safety.

    III. Supporting View 2: Stabilising the Economy

    IV. Supporting View 3: Addressing National Security Threats

    V. Opposing View 1: Undermining Democratic Principles

    VI. Opposing View 2: Violating Human Rights

    VII. Opposing View 3: Eroding Public Trust

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Desperate measures can be justified in extreme situations to ensure public safety and stability, but they risk undermining democratic principles, human rights, and long-term societal trust.
    • Summary of Key Points: Public safety, economic stability, national security versus democratic principles, human rights, public trust.
    • Final Thought: Balancing immediate needs with long-term values is crucial for justifying extreme measures.

    Do you agree that it is increasingly difficult to tell right from wrong?

    It is increasingly difficult to tell right from wrong due to the complexity of modern issues, misinformation, and cultural relativism. However, ethical frameworks, education, and critical thinking still provide guidance.

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Humans are not blind. They can clearly discern right from wrong.
    • Background: Overview of moral ambiguity in modern society.
    • Thesis Statement: It is increasingly difficult to tell right from wrong due to social complexity, misinformation, and cultural relativism, but ethical frameworks and education can offer guidance.

    II. Supporting View 1: Complexity of Modern Issues

    III. Supporting View 3: Cultural Relativism

    IV. Opposing View 1: Ethical Frameworks Provide Guidance

    • Topic Sentence: Established ethical frameworks help maintain moral clarity.
    • Example 1: Human rights laws in the EU (2017-2021) uphold moral standards. Human rights frameworks guide ethical decision-making (source: European Commission, 2020). https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights_en
    • Analysis: Ethical frameworks provide a foundation for determining right from wrong.

    V. Opposing View 2: Education and Critical Thinking

    VI. Opposing View 3: Role of Community and Dialogue

    • Topic Sentence: Community values and open dialogue support moral clarity.
    • Example 1: Community forums in Germany (2017-2021) foster ethical discussions. Forums encourage dialogue on moral issues (source: Deutsche Welle, 2019). https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-community-forums/a-51157813
    • Analysis: Community involvement and dialogue help reinforce shared moral values.

    VII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Distinguishing right from wrong is becoming more difficult due to complexity, misinformation, and cultural relativism, but ethical frameworks and education offer guidance.
    • Summary of Key Points: Complexity of modern issues, spread of misinformation, cultural relativism versus ethical frameworks, education, and community dialogue.
    • Final Thought: Navigating moral ambiguity requires a combination of ethical frameworks, critical thinking, and community engagement.

    Solitude is enjoyable and beneficial. Discuss.

    Solitude in the right combination can be enjoyable and beneficial, fostering creativity, personal growth, and mental health. However, it can also lead to loneliness, anxiety, and social disconnection if experienced excessively.

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Solitude is a sanctuary for the mind.
    • Background: Overview of the concept of solitude and its impacts.
    • Thesis Statement: Solitude can be enjoyable and beneficial, promoting creativity, personal growth, and mental health.

    II. Supporting View 1: Solitude Fosters Creativity

    III. Supporting View 2: Solitude Promotes Personal Growth

    IV. Supporting View 3: Solitude Improves Mental Health

    V. Opposing View 1: Solitude Can Lead to Loneliness

    VI. Opposing View 2: Solitude May Increase Anxiety

    VII. Opposing View 3: Solitude Can Lead to Social Disconnection

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Solitude is generally enjoyable and beneficial, promoting creativity, personal growth, and mental health, but excessive solitude can have negative effects.
    • Summary of Key Points: Solitude fosters creativity, personal growth, mental health versus loneliness, anxiety, social disconnection.
    • Final Thought: Balancing solitude with social interaction can maximise its benefits and minimise its drawbacks.

    Technology is the only effective means of tackling social problems. Discuss.

    Technology can effectively tackle social problems by improving access to services, fostering communication, and promoting innovation. However, it also poses challenges such as exacerbating inequality, privacy issues, and technological dependency

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Technology can effectively tackle social problems with speed and ease like never before.
    • Background: Overview of technology’s role in addressing social problems.
    • Thesis Statement: Technology offers effective solutions for social problems.

    II. Supporting View 1: Improved Access to Services

    • Topic Sentence: Technology can effectively tackle social problems by improving access to essential services.
    • Example 1: India’s Aadhaar system (2010-present) provided millions with a digital identity, facilitating access to government services. Helped marginalised communities access subsidies and benefits (source: BBC, 2017).
    • Example 2: Kenya’s M-Pesa mobile banking (2007-present) enabled financial inclusion for millions without bank accounts. Revolutionised financial transactions and reduced poverty (source: The Guardian, 2015).
    • Example 3: Brazil’s Telehealth programme (2012-present) increased healthcare access in remote areas. Reduced healthcare disparities through telemedicine (source: Reuters, 2018).
    • Analysis: These examples show how technology enhances access to essential services, benefiting disadvantaged populations.

    III. Supporting View 2: Fostering Communication and Awareness

    • Topic Sentence: Technology can effectively tackle social problems by fostering communication and raising awareness of social issues.
    • Example 1: #MeToo movement in India (2017-present) leveraged social media to highlight sexual harassment. Empowered survivors and initiated widespread social discourse (source: The New York Times, 2018).
    • Example 2: Hong Kong protests (2019-2020) used social media to organise and spread awareness. Enabled real-time coordination and global visibility (source: BBC, 2019).
    • Example 3: Chile’s feminist protests (2018-present) used digital platforms to mobilise and advocate for gender equality. Raised international awareness and sparked policy changes (source: Al Jazeera, 2019).
    • Analysis: These instances illustrate how technology can amplify voices and drive social change.

    IV. Supporting View 3: Promoting Innovation and Efficiency

    • Topic Sentence: Technology drives innovation and efficiency in addressing social issues.
    • Example 1: Sweden’s smart cities (2015-present) use technology to enhance urban living and sustainability. Improved energy efficiency and quality of life (source: World Economic Forum, 2018).
    • Example 2: South Korea’s digital classrooms (2010-present) bridged educational gaps with e-learning. Equalised access to quality education (source: The Korea Times, 2017).
    • Example 3: Norway’s electric vehicle incentives (2010-present) reduced pollution and promoted sustainable transport. Became a global leader in EV adoption (source: The Guardian, 2019).
    • Analysis: These examples demonstrate technology’s role in creating innovative solutions for social problems.

    V. Opposing View 1: Exacerbating Inequality

    • Topic Sentence: Technology can widen the gap between rich and poor.
    • Example 1: India’s digital divide (2015-present) left rural areas lagging in internet access. Exacerbated educational and economic disparities (source: The Hindu, 2020).
    • Example 2: South Africa’s unequal access to technology (2010-present) reinforced social inequalities. Marginalised communities missed out on technological benefits (source: Mail & Guardian, 2019).
    • Example 3: Brazil’s urban-rural technology gap (2010-present) highlighted systemic inequalities. Limited technological advancements to urban areas (source: Folha de S.Paulo, 2018).
    • Analysis: These cases show how unequal access to technology can deepen existing social disparities.

    VI. Opposing View 2: Privacy and Security Concerns

    • Topic Sentence: Technology raises significant privacy and security concerns.
    • Example 1: China’s social credit system (2014-present) sparked global privacy debates. Extensive surveillance and data collection raised ethical issues (source: The Guardian, 2018).
    • Example 2: Europe’s GDPR violations (2018-present) highlighted the complexity of data privacy. Companies struggled to comply, risking user data (source: Financial Times, 2019).
    • Example 3: India’s Aadhaar data breaches (2010-present) exposed millions to privacy risks. Compromised personal information and security (source: The New York Times, 2018).
    • Analysis: These examples illustrate the significant privacy risks associated with technological advancements.

    VII. Opposing View 3: Technological Dependency and Disruption

    • Topic Sentence: Over-reliance on technology can lead to dependency and disruption.
    • Example 1: Japan’s 2011 earthquake revealed vulnerabilities in technology-dependent societies. Disrupted essential services, highlighting risks (source: BBC, 2011).
    • Example 2: South Korea’s cybersecurity threats (2010-present) demonstrated risks of digital dependency. Increased vulnerability to cyber-attacks (source: The Korea Herald, 2020).
    • Example 3: Brazil’s digital economy (2015-present) faced challenges during internet outages. Economic activities halted, showing over-reliance on technology (source: Reuters, 2019).
    • Analysis: These instances show how technological dependency can lead to significant disruptions.

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Technology offers effective solutions for social problems but also presents significant challenges.
    • Summary of Key Points: Improved access, communication, innovation versus inequality, privacy, and dependency.
    • Final Thought: Balancing technological advancements with ethical considerations is crucial for addressing social problems effectively.

    Nota Benne:

    Can laws be implemented to solve social problems? What about the role of education?

    Romance novels are only for the foolish. Comment.

    Romance novels provide meaningful value. While some may dismiss romance novels as frivolous, they provide emotional growth, and societal insight, challenging the notion that they are only for the foolish.

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Romance novels often face ridicule, but romance novels provide a greater utility than is actually apparent. Romance novels provide meaningful value.
    • Background: Popularity and criticism of romance literature.
    • Thesis Statement: Romance novels offer valuable experiences beyond mere foolish entertainment.

    II. Supporting View 1: Emotional Growth and Empathy

    • Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide meaningful value by enhancing emotional intelligence and empathy.
    • Example 1: The Rosie Project by Graeme Simsion (2013) explores Asperger’s Syndrome.
    • Example 2: Me Before You by Jojo Moyes (2012) discusses euthanasia and disability.
    • Example 3: Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman (2017) addresses loneliness and mental health.
    • Analysis: These novels highlight complex emotional and psychological issues.

    III. Supporting View 2: Insight into Social Issues

    • Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide meaningful value by addressing important social themes.
    • Example 1: The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas (2017) focuses on racial injustice.
    • Example 2: Red, White & Royal Blue by Casey McQuiston (2019) explores LGBTQ+ relationships.
    • Example 3: An American Marriage by Tayari Jones (2018) deals with wrongful imprisonment.
    • Analysis: These stories engage with and educate on societal challenges.

    IV. Supporting View 3: Escapism and Mental Health Benefits

    • Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide necessary escapism and mental health benefits.
    • Example 1: Increase in romance novel sales during COVID-19 lockdowns (2020-present).
    • Example 2: Beach Read by Emily Henry (2020) offers a light-hearted escape.
    • Example 3: The Flatshare by Beth O’Leary (2019) brings comfort and joy.
    • Analysis: Escapism through romance novels helps readers cope with real-life stress.

    V. Opposing View 1: Perceived Lack of Literary Merit

    • Topic Sentence: Critics argue romance novels lack literary depth.
    • Example 1: Critics’ dismissal of Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James (2011).
    • Example 2: Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer (2005-2008) often mocked.
    • Example 3: After series by Anna Todd (2014-present) criticised for simplistic writing.
    • Analysis: These works are often seen as poorly written and lacking substance.

    VI. Opposing View 2: Reinforcement of Stereotypes

    • Topic Sentence: Romance novels can perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
    • Example 1: Mills & Boon novels often criticised for outdated gender roles.
    • Example 2: Beautiful Disaster by Jamie McGuire (2011) portrays toxic relationships.
    • Example 3: The Selection series by Kiera Cass (2012-present) reinforces traditional beauty standards.
    • Analysis: These novels can propagate negative and unrealistic societal expectations.

    VII. Opposing View 3: Unrealistic Expectations

    • Topic Sentence: Romance novels can create unrealistic relationship expectations.
    • Example 1: The Notebook by Nicholas Sparks (1996) idealises love.
    • Example 2: The Wedding Date by Jasmine Guillory (2018) romanticises spontaneous romance.
    • Example 3: Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon (1991-present) sets unrealistic standards for love and adventure.
    • Analysis: These narratives can lead to disappointment in real-life relationships.

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Romance novels, while sometimes criticised, offer significant benefits.
    • Summary of Key Points: Emotional growth, societal insights, and mental health benefits versus lack of literary merit, stereotypes, and unrealistic expectations.
    • Final Thought: Romance novels should be valued for their positive impact on readers.

    Reading References:

    1. Regis, Pamela. A Natural History of the Romance Novel. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
    2. Radway, Janice A. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, 2009.
    3. Betts, Hannah. “The Mental Health Benefits of Escapist Fiction.” The Guardian, 2020.

    Do you agree with the view that the most dangerous threats to mankind today are political and religious extremism?

    Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Threats to mankind in the form of extremist ideologies often dominate headlines and incite fear globally.
    • Background: Overview of recent instances of political and religious extremism.
    • Thesis Statement: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

    II. Supporting View 1: Political Extremism

    • Topic Sentence: Political extremism destabilises societies and endangers lives.
    • Example 1: The Syrian civil war (2011-present) has caused immense suffering.
    • Example 2: Venezuela’s political crisis (2013-present) led to mass displacement.
    • Example 3: Myanmar’s military coup (2021) resulted in widespread violence.
    • Analysis: These examples show how political extremism disrupts peace and stability.

    III. Supporting View 2: Religious Extremism

    • Topic Sentence: Religious extremism incites violence and terror.
    • Example 1: Boko Haram’s insurgency in Nigeria (2010-present) caused many deaths.
    • Example 2: Sri Lanka’s Easter bombings (2019) killed hundreds.
    • Example 3: ISIS attacks in Europe (2015-2017) spread fear and chaos.
    • Analysis: These instances highlight the lethal impact of religious extremism.

    IV. Supporting View 3: Global Influence of Extremism

    • Topic Sentence: Extremism’s global reach amplifies its threat to mankind.
    • Example 1: Spread of far-right movements in Europe (2015-present).
    • Example 2: Rise of jihadist groups in Africa (2010-present).
    • Example 3: Influence of extremist ideologies on social media (2010-present).
    • Analysis: The global influence of extremism intensifies its danger to mankind.

    V. Opposing View 1: Climate Change

    • Topic Sentence: Climate change poses a more existential threat.
    • Example 1: Australia’s bushfires (2019-2020) devastated ecosystems.
    • Example 2: Floods in South Asia (2020) displaced millions.
    • Example 3: Droughts in Africa (2015-present) exacerbated food insecurity.
    • Analysis: These events demonstrate the severe impact of climate change on human survival.

    VI. Opposing View 2: Economic Instability

    • Topic Sentence: Economic instability threatens global stability and is a threat to mankind.
    • Example 1: Greece’s debt crisis (2010-2018) caused widespread hardship.
    • Example 2: Argentina’s financial crisis (2018-present) led to severe poverty.
    • Example 3: Lebanon’s economic collapse (2019-present) resulted in mass protests.
    • Analysis: Economic instability can destabilise nations and affect millions.

    VII. Opposing View 3: Technological Risks

    • Topic Sentence: Technological advancements can also pose significant threats.
    • Example 1: Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine (2015-present).
    • Example 2: Data privacy breaches in Europe (2015-present).
    • Example 3: AI misuse concerns in China (2010-present).
    • Analysis: These examples highlight the dangers of unchecked technological advancements.

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats, but other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.
    • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
    • Final Thought: Addressing these threats requires a comprehensive approach that considers all potential dangers to mankind.

    Reading References:

    1. Hoffman, Bruce. Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press, 2017.
    2. Stern, Jessica, and J.M. Berger. ISIS: The State of Terror. Ecco, 2015.
    3. Mann, Michael E. The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial Is Threatening Our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy. Columbia University Press, 2016.
    4. Old but still gold: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/10/21/in-gods-name-evaluating-the-links-between-religious-extremism-and-terrorism/

    The only way to deal with a criminal is to remove him from society. Discuss.

    While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

    I. Introduction

    • Hook: Crime remains a significant challenge for societies worldwide.
    • Background: Overview of traditional and alternative approaches to dealing with criminals.
    • Thesis Statement: While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

    II. Supporting View 1: Public Safety

    • Topic Sentence: Removing criminals ensures public safety by preventing further harm.
    • Example 1: In 2020, the UK increased sentences for serious offenders to protect citizens.
    • Example 2: In 2019, Italy’s anti-mafia operations removed dangerous criminals from society.
    • Example 3: In 2021, Australia implemented strict measures to detain violent offenders.
    • Analysis: These examples demonstrate how removing criminals enhances public safety.

    III. Supporting View 2: Deterrence

    • Topic Sentence: Harsh penalties serve as a deterrent to potential criminals.
    • Example 1: In 2018, Singapore’s strict drug laws deterred drug trafficking.
    • Example 2: In 2019, Saudi Arabia’s severe penalties for theft reduced crime rates.
    • Example 3: In 2020, Japan’s tough stance on organised crime deterred criminal activities.
    • Analysis: These instances show that strict penalties can deter criminal behaviour.

    IV. Supporting View 3: Retribution

    • Topic Sentence: Removing criminals serves as retribution, providing justice for victims.
    • Example 1: In 2019, India imposed death penalties for heinous crimes, providing closure to victims’ families.
    • Example 2: In 2020, South Africa’s long prison sentences for violent crimes satisfied public demand for justice.
    • Example 3: In 2021, France’s life sentences for terrorists offered retribution to affected communities.
    • Analysis: These examples illustrate how removing criminals satisfies the need for justice and retribution.

    V. Opposing View 1: Rehabilitation

    • Topic Sentence: Rehabilitation offers a chance for criminals to reform and reintegrate.
    • Example 1: In 2020, Norway’s rehabilitation programmes significantly reduced reoffending rates.
    • Example 2: In 2019, Sweden’s focus on rehabilitation over punishment led to successful reintegration of offenders.
    • Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s humane prison system prioritised rehabilitation, showing positive outcomes.
    • Analysis: These cases demonstrate the effectiveness of rehabilitation in reducing reoffending and promoting reintegration.

    VI. Opposing View 2: Restorative Justice

    • Topic Sentence: Restorative justice addresses the harm caused and promotes healing.
    • Example 1: In 2018, New Zealand’s restorative justice practices helped victims and offenders reconcile.
    • Example 2: In 2019, South Africa’s community justice programmes resolved conflicts and healed communities.
    • Example 3: In 2020, Canada’s restorative justice initiatives reduced recidivism and repaired harm.
    • Analysis: These instances show how restorative justice can effectively address crime’s impact and promote healing.

    VII. Opposing View 3: Social and Economic Costs

    • Topic Sentence: Removing criminals from society incurs high social and economic costs.
    • Example 1: In 2020, the UK faced criticism for the high costs of long-term imprisonment.
    • Example 2: In 2019, Italy struggled with overcrowded prisons and the associated costs.
    • Example 3: In 2021, Australia debated the financial burden of extensive incarceration policies.
    • Analysis: These examples highlight the significant social and economic costs of removing criminals from society.

    VIII. Conclusion

    • Restate Thesis: While removing criminals can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer viable alternatives that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.
    • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
    • Final Thought: A balanced approach combining removal, rehabilitation, and restorative justice can effectively address crime and promote societal well-being.