Literature – Gp Lah!

Romance novels provide meaningful value. While some may dismiss romance novels as frivolous, they provide emotional growth, and societal insight, challenging the notion that they are only for the foolish.

I. Introduction

Hook: Romance novels often face ridicule, but romance novels provide a greater utility than is actually apparent. Romance novels provide meaningful value.
Background: Popularity and criticism of romance literature.
Thesis Statement: Romance novels offer valuable experiences beyond mere foolish entertainment.

II. Supporting View 1: Emotional Growth and Empathy

Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide meaningful value by enhancing emotional intelligence and empathy.
Example 1: The Rosie Project by Graeme Simsion (2013) explores Asperger’s Syndrome.
Example 2: Me Before You by Jojo Moyes (2012) discusses euthanasia and disability.
Example 3: Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine by Gail Honeyman (2017) addresses loneliness and mental health.
Analysis: These novels highlight complex emotional and psychological issues.

III. Supporting View 2: Insight into Social Issues

Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide meaningful value by addressing important social themes.
Example 1: The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas (2017) focuses on racial injustice.
Example 2: Red, White & Royal Blue by Casey McQuiston (2019) explores LGBTQ+ relationships.
Example 3: An American Marriage by Tayari Jones (2018) deals with wrongful imprisonment.
Analysis: These stories engage with and educate on societal challenges.

IV. Supporting View 3: Escapism and Mental Health Benefits

Topic Sentence: Romance novels provide necessary escapism and mental health benefits.
Example 1: Increase in romance novel sales during COVID-19 lockdowns (2020-present).
Example 2: Beach Read by Emily Henry (2020) offers a light-hearted escape.
Example 3: The Flatshare by Beth O’Leary (2019) brings comfort and joy.
Analysis: Escapism through romance novels helps readers cope with real-life stress.

V. Opposing View 1: Perceived Lack of Literary Merit

Topic Sentence: Critics argue romance novels lack literary depth.
Example 1: Critics’ dismissal of Fifty Shades of Grey by E.L. James (2011).
Example 2: Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer (2005-2008) often mocked.
Example 3: After series by Anna Todd (2014-present) criticised for simplistic writing.
Analysis: These works are often seen as poorly written and lacking substance.

VI. Opposing View 2: Reinforcement of Stereotypes

Topic Sentence: Romance novels can perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
Example 1: Mills & Boon novels often criticised for outdated gender roles.
Example 2: Beautiful Disaster by Jamie McGuire (2011) portrays toxic relationships.
Example 3: The Selection series by Kiera Cass (2012-present) reinforces traditional beauty standards.
Analysis: These novels can propagate negative and unrealistic societal expectations.

VII. Opposing View 3: Unrealistic Expectations

Topic Sentence: Romance novels can create unrealistic relationship expectations.
Example 1: The Notebook by Nicholas Sparks (1996) idealises love.
Example 2: The Wedding Date by Jasmine Guillory (2018) romanticises spontaneous romance.
Example 3: Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon (1991-present) sets unrealistic standards for love and adventure.
Analysis: These narratives can lead to disappointment in real-life relationships.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Romance novels, while sometimes criticised, offer significant benefits.
Summary of Key Points: Emotional growth, societal insights, and mental health benefits versus lack of literary merit, stereotypes, and unrealistic expectations.
Final Thought: Romance novels should be valued for their positive impact on readers.

Reading References:

Regis, Pamela. A Natural History of the Romance Novel. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.
Radway, Janice A. Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. University of North Carolina Press, 2009.
Betts, Hannah. “The Mental Health Benefits of Escapist Fiction.” The Guardian, 2020.

Technological advancements in the modern age have allowed people to have access to media more than ever before. Through apps like Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook and Tumblr, people can share and view images which are mundane to the mind-boggling. A picture is more powerful than words.

Critics of words suggest that images have more power than words because they capture the imagination of society in an impactful manner. There is little doubt that images are considered more creative than words and have contributed largely to the society in positive ways. For example, the artist Banksy is known to highlight powerful messages through his art. Similarly, in the earlier times many artists like Goya, Picasso and Jacques Louis David had tried to revolutionize the world through their art. Photographs like A Man on the Moon or Steve McCurry’s Afghan Girl are considered important images that has changed the course of history. Photographs have also captured the horrors of war which has led to huge emotional response. Notable photographs include the Napalm Girl, which showed the impact of American war in Vietnam. Thus, it can be said that images have exposed the horrors that exist in the world. As such, a picture is more powerful than words.

Critics of pictures valiantly promote the view that despite the allure of pictures and videos, words still hold a significant place. They explify their stand by citing the ever increasing sales of novels, books and magazines. For example, J.K Rowling’s Harry Potter is still popular; books like 1984 by George Orwell and Killing a Mockingbird by Harper Lee continue to leave a lasting impact on new audiences. Words are a powerful medium is also evident from the fact that, people continue to buy self-help books. For example books like “You can heal your Life” by Louise Hay and “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho have sold millions of copies and continue to inspire people and guide them to live a successful and happy life. Words are an elixer that soothes the mind and soul. Hence, pictures are not always more powerful.

However, pictures do not always convey the intended meaning and sometimes the people fail to connect with pictures on an emotional level. Words have a more lasting impact and can stand the test of time. For example, Shakespeare’s plays like Hamlet, The Last Lear and As you Like, use words that evoke a series of emotions that people can still relate to in present times. The mastery of his words continues to inspire and impress people around the world even today. In fact, many phrases used by people in daily life are actually from Shakespeare’s plays. His dialogues like “All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players” are repeated and considered a metaphor for life even today.

Images of Mahatma Gandhi exemplify peaceful resistance. The famed head portrait of Che Guevera subliminally depict the fight against oppression. When Malala Yousufzai’s or Greta Thunberg’s stand to deliver the views, it is images that we first connect to, not words. Historically, the mushroom cloud over Hiroshima is still etched in all our minds. In more contemporary times, the incessant media coverage on Trump has painted in our minds a certain view of him. It is pictures that move and mould our thinking. Not words. A picture is more powerful than words.

No single word has changed the world, but a single picture has.