Do you agree with the view that the most dangerous threats to mankind today are political and religious extremism?

Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: Threats to mankind in the form of extremist ideologies often dominate headlines and incite fear globally.
  • Background: Overview of recent instances of political and religious extremism.
  • Thesis Statement: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

II. Supporting View 1: Political Extremism

  • Topic Sentence: Political extremism destabilises societies and endangers lives.
  • Example 1: The Syrian civil war (2011-present) has caused immense suffering.
  • Example 2: Venezuela’s political crisis (2013-present) led to mass displacement.
  • Example 3: Myanmar’s military coup (2021) resulted in widespread violence.
  • Analysis: These examples show how political extremism disrupts peace and stability.

III. Supporting View 2: Religious Extremism

  • Topic Sentence: Religious extremism incites violence and terror.
  • Example 1: Boko Haram’s insurgency in Nigeria (2010-present) caused many deaths.
  • Example 2: Sri Lanka’s Easter bombings (2019) killed hundreds.
  • Example 3: ISIS attacks in Europe (2015-2017) spread fear and chaos.
  • Analysis: These instances highlight the lethal impact of religious extremism.

IV. Supporting View 3: Global Influence of Extremism

  • Topic Sentence: Extremism’s global reach amplifies its threat to mankind.
  • Example 1: Spread of far-right movements in Europe (2015-present).
  • Example 2: Rise of jihadist groups in Africa (2010-present).
  • Example 3: Influence of extremist ideologies on social media (2010-present).
  • Analysis: The global influence of extremism intensifies its danger to mankind.

V. Opposing View 1: Climate Change

  • Topic Sentence: Climate change poses a more existential threat.
  • Example 1: Australia’s bushfires (2019-2020) devastated ecosystems.
  • Example 2: Floods in South Asia (2020) displaced millions.
  • Example 3: Droughts in Africa (2015-present) exacerbated food insecurity.
  • Analysis: These events demonstrate the severe impact of climate change on human survival.

VI. Opposing View 2: Economic Instability

  • Topic Sentence: Economic instability threatens global stability and is a threat to mankind.
  • Example 1: Greece’s debt crisis (2010-2018) caused widespread hardship.
  • Example 2: Argentina’s financial crisis (2018-present) led to severe poverty.
  • Example 3: Lebanon’s economic collapse (2019-present) resulted in mass protests.
  • Analysis: Economic instability can destabilise nations and affect millions.

VII. Opposing View 3: Technological Risks

  • Topic Sentence: Technological advancements can also pose significant threats.
  • Example 1: Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine (2015-present).
  • Example 2: Data privacy breaches in Europe (2015-present).
  • Example 3: AI misuse concerns in China (2010-present).
  • Analysis: These examples highlight the dangers of unchecked technological advancements.

VIII. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats, but other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.
  • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
  • Final Thought: Addressing these threats requires a comprehensive approach that considers all potential dangers to mankind.

Reading References:

  1. Hoffman, Bruce. Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press, 2017.
  2. Stern, Jessica, and J.M. Berger. ISIS: The State of Terror. Ecco, 2015.
  3. Mann, Michael E. The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial Is Threatening Our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy. Columbia University Press, 2016.
  4. Old but still gold: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/10/21/in-gods-name-evaluating-the-links-between-religious-extremism-and-terrorism/