Gp Lah! – Page 3 – Get moving lah!

The study of history is futile. Do you agree?

The study of history is crucial. Understanding current events can help shape future decisions.

I. Introduction

Hook: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
Background: Importance of history in education and society.
Thesis Statement: Study of history is crucial for understanding present issues and guiding future decisions, despite claims of its futility.

II. Supporting View 1: History Teaches Valuable Lessons

Topic Sentence: Study of history is crucial as history offers lessons from past successes and failures.
Example 1: Germany’s reconciliation post-Holocaust (2013-present).
Example 2: South Africa’s truth and reconciliation post-apartheid (2010s).
Example 3: Rwanda’s recovery after the 1994 genocide (2014-present).
Analysis: These examples show how history provides valuable lessons for healing and reconciliation.

III. Supporting View 2: History Helps Understand Current Issues

Topic Sentence: Understanding history helps explain current socio-political issues.
Example 1: Brexit and its historical roots (2016-present).
Example 2: Middle East conflicts and colonial history (2010s).
Example 3: Indigenous rights movements in Australia (2014-present).
Analysis: These cases demonstrate how historical context explains contemporary issues.

IV. Supporting View 3: History Informs Future Decisions

Topic Sentence: History informs better decision-making for the future.
Example 1: Environmental policies inspired by past mistakes (2010s-present).
Example 2: Economic reforms influenced by historical financial crises (2010s).
Example 3: Public health strategies post-pandemic reflections (2020s).
Analysis: These instances show how historical knowledge guides future policy decisions.

V. Opposing View 1: History is Subjective and Biased

Topic Sentence: History is often biased and subjective.
Example 1: Revisionist histories in Japan (2012-present).
Example 2: Controversial colonial narratives in India (2010s).
Example 3: Biased educational content in Turkey (2010s-present).
Analysis: These examples highlight how historical narratives can be manipulated, questioning their reliability.

VI. Opposing View 2: Focus on Future Technology and Innovation

Topic Sentence: Emphasis should be on future technology and innovation.
Example 1: Singapore’s focus on STEM education (2010s-present).
Example 2: South Korea’s tech-driven economy (2010s-present).
Example 3: Israel’s innovation in technology sectors (2010s-present).
Analysis: These cases argue that focusing on future advancements is more beneficial than studying history.

VII. Opposing View 3: History is Irrelevant to Modern Problems

Topic Sentence: Modern problems require contemporary solutions, not historical perspectives.
Example 1: Climate change policies focusing on future solutions (2010s-present).
Example 2: Digital privacy laws addressing new technological challenges (2010s-present).
Example 3: Modern healthcare advancements tackling current health issues (2010s-present).
Analysis: These examples suggest that contemporary issues need innovative approaches, making historical knowledge less relevant.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Studying history is crucial for understanding present issues and guiding future decisions, despite claims of its futility.
Summary of Key Points: Recap main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balancing historical knowledge with forward-thinking innovation is key to addressing modern challenges.

Reading References

MacMillan, Margaret. The Uses and Abuses of History. Profile Books, 2009.
Carr, Edward Hallet. What Is History?. Penguin Books, 2008.
Evans, Richard J. In Defence of History. Granta Books, 2012.

Politicians cannot be idealistic in today’s world; they have to be pragmatic. Discuss.

In today’s complex global landscape, politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism to address urgent issues effectively, though idealism can still inspire positive change.

I. Introduction

Hook: The balance between idealism and pragmatism defines political leadership. Politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism to bring its people and country forward instead of living in fantasy.
Background: Overview of the current political climate.
Thesis Statement: Politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism to address urgent issues effectively. On a limited basis, idealism can inspire some change.

II. Supporting View 1: Pragmatism Ensures Realistic Solutions

Topic Sentence: Politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism as only pragmatic politicians can implement feasible solutions.
Example 1: Germany’s pragmatic energy policies (2014-present) balance renewables and coal.
Example 2: Singapore’s pragmatic housing policies (2010-present) ensured affordability.
Example 3: India’s pragmatic economic reforms (2014-present) boosted growth.
Analysis: These examples show how pragmatism leads to effective, realistic policies.

III. Supporting View 2: Pragmatism Navigates Political Realities

Topic Sentence: Politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism, as pragmatism helps navigate complex political realities.
Example 1: UK’s pragmatic Brexit negotiations (2016-2022) aimed to mitigate disruption.
Example 2: Colombia’s pragmatic peace deal (2016) ended a long conflict.
Example 3: Japan’s pragmatic approach to North Korea (2010-present) maintains stability.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how pragmatism helps manage political complexities.

IV. Supporting View 3: Pragmatism Addresses Immediate Needs

Topic Sentence: Pragmatic politicians focus on urgent, immediate needs.
Example 1: New Zealand’s pragmatic COVID-19 response (2020-present) saved lives.
Example 2: Canada’s pragmatic immigration policies (2015-present) addressed labour shortages.
Example 3: South Korea’s pragmatic tech policies (2010-present) drove innovation.
Analysis: These cases illustrate how pragmatism addresses urgent needs effectively.

V. Opposing View 1: Idealism Inspires Long-term Vision

Topic Sentence: Idealistic politicians inspire long-term visionary goals.
Example 1: Sweden’s climate-neutral goal (2017-present) promotes sustainability.
Example 2: France’s idealistic education reforms (2012-present) aimed at equality.
Example 3: Norway’s humanitarian policies (2015-present) support global peace.
Analysis: These examples highlight how idealism can drive significant long-term progress.

VI. Opposing View 2: Idealism Upholds Moral Integrity

Topic Sentence: Idealism maintains moral and ethical integrity.
Example 1: Finland’s idealistic stance on human rights (2010-present) sets global standards.
Example 2: Iceland’s idealistic environmental policies (2010-present) preserve nature.
Example 3: Switzerland’s idealistic neutrality (2010-present) promotes global diplomacy.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate how idealism preserves ethical and moral standards.

VII. Opposing View 3: Idealism Attracts Public Support

Topic Sentence: Idealistic politicians gain public trust and support.
Example 1: Jacinda Ardern’s idealistic leadership in New Zealand (2017-present) boosts popularity.
Example 2: Canada’s idealistic health care policies (2015-present) ensure public welfare.
Example 3: Bhutan’s idealistic Gross National Happiness policy (2010-present) inspires the nation.
Analysis: These examples show how idealism can attract and retain public support.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Politicians must prioritise pragmatism over idealism, though idealism can inspire positive change.
Summary of Key Points: Recap main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balancing pragmatism and idealism is key to effective political leadership.

Reading References:

Fukuyama, Francis. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014.
Mounk, Yascha. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard University Press, 2018.

Do you agree with the view that the most dangerous threats to mankind today are political and religious extremism?

Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

I. Introduction

Hook: Threats to mankind in the form of extremist ideologies often dominate headlines and incite fear globally.
Background: Overview of recent instances of political and religious extremism.
Thesis Statement: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats to mankind today, though other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.

II. Supporting View 1: Political Extremism

Topic Sentence: Political extremism destabilises societies and endangers lives.
Example 1: The Syrian civil war (2011-present) has caused immense suffering.
Example 2: Venezuela’s political crisis (2013-present) led to mass displacement.
Example 3: Myanmar’s military coup (2021) resulted in widespread violence.
Analysis: These examples show how political extremism disrupts peace and stability.

III. Supporting View 2: Religious Extremism

Topic Sentence: Religious extremism incites violence and terror.
Example 1: Boko Haram’s insurgency in Nigeria (2010-present) caused many deaths.
Example 2: Sri Lanka’s Easter bombings (2019) killed hundreds.
Example 3: ISIS attacks in Europe (2015-2017) spread fear and chaos.
Analysis: These instances highlight the lethal impact of religious extremism.

IV. Supporting View 3: Global Influence of Extremism

Topic Sentence: Extremism’s global reach amplifies its threat to mankind.
Example 1: Spread of far-right movements in Europe (2015-present).
Example 2: Rise of jihadist groups in Africa (2010-present).
Example 3: Influence of extremist ideologies on social media (2010-present).
Analysis: The global influence of extremism intensifies its danger to mankind.

V. Opposing View 1: Climate Change

Topic Sentence: Climate change poses a more existential threat.
Example 1: Australia’s bushfires (2019-2020) devastated ecosystems.
Example 2: Floods in South Asia (2020) displaced millions.
Example 3: Droughts in Africa (2015-present) exacerbated food insecurity.
Analysis: These events demonstrate the severe impact of climate change on human survival.

VI. Opposing View 2: Economic Instability

Topic Sentence: Economic instability threatens global stability and is a threat to mankind.
Example 1: Greece’s debt crisis (2010-2018) caused widespread hardship.
Example 2: Argentina’s financial crisis (2018-present) led to severe poverty.
Example 3: Lebanon’s economic collapse (2019-present) resulted in mass protests.
Analysis: Economic instability can destabilise nations and affect millions.

VII. Opposing View 3: Technological Risks

Topic Sentence: Technological advancements can also pose significant threats.
Example 1: Cyberattacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine (2015-present).
Example 2: Data privacy breaches in Europe (2015-present).
Example 3: AI misuse concerns in China (2010-present).
Analysis: These examples highlight the dangers of unchecked technological advancements.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Political and religious extremism pose significant threats, but other factors such as climate change, economic instability, and technological risks are equally dangerous.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Addressing these threats requires a comprehensive approach that considers all potential dangers to mankind.

Reading References:

Hoffman, Bruce. Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press, 2017.
Stern, Jessica, and J.M. Berger. ISIS: The State of Terror. Ecco, 2015.
Mann, Michael E. The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial Is Threatening Our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy. Columbia University Press, 2016.
Old but still gold: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/10/21/in-gods-name-evaluating-the-links-between-religious-extremism-and-terrorism/

The idea that science will one day create a perfect world is a dangerous delusion. Discuss.

There is little doubt that science is a stealthy snake. While science has made significant progress, the belief that it will create a perfect world is a dangerous delusion due to ethical, social, and environmental concerns.

I. Introduction

Hook: The promise of a perfect world through science captivates many. But science is dangerous.
Background: Overview of scientific advancements and their impact on society.
Thesis Statement: While science has made significant progress, the belief that it will create a perfect world is a dangerous delusion due to ethical, social, and environmental concerns.

II. Supporting View 1: Ethical Concerns

Topic Sentence: Science is dangerous so much so that scientific advancements often raise ethical concerns.
Example 1: In 2018, China’s gene-editing of babies sparked global ethical debates.
Example 2: In 2020, Japan faced ethical questions about AI in healthcare.
Example 3: In 2019, India’s use of biometric data raised privacy concerns.
Analysis: These examples show how ethical dilemmas challenge the notion of a perfect world through science.

III. Supporting View 2: Social Inequality

Topic Sentence: Science can exacerbate social inequality.
Example 1: In 2021, South Africa’s unequal vaccine distribution highlighted disparities.
Example 2: In 2019, India’s digital divide worsened educational inequalities.
Example 3: In 2020, the UK’s access to advanced healthcare technologies was unequal.
Analysis: These instances illustrate how scientific progress can increase social inequalities.

IV. Supporting View 3: Environmental Impact

Topic Sentence: Scientific advancements can harm the environment.
Example 1: In 2021, Brazil’s deforestation for biofuel production harmed ecosystems.
Example 2: In 2020, Australia’s mining activities caused significant environmental damage.
Example 3: In 2019, China’s industrial pollution remained a severe issue.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate that scientific progress often comes with environmental costs.

V. Opposing View 1: Solving Global Problems

Topic Sentence: Science has the potential to solve global problems.
Example 1: In 2021, Germany’s renewable energy initiatives addressed climate change.
Example 2: In 2019, Japan’s disaster prevention technologies saved lives.
Example 3: In 2020, India’s clean water projects improved public health.
Analysis: These examples show how scientific advancements can address critical global issues.

VI. Opposing View 2: Enhancing Quality of Life

Topic Sentence: Science enhances the quality of life for many.
Example 1: In 2020, South Korea’s healthcare innovations extended life expectancy.
Example 2: In 2019, Switzerland’s technological advancements improved daily convenience.
Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s education technology enhanced learning experiences.
Analysis: These instances highlight how science can significantly improve quality of life.

VII. Opposing View 3: Economic Growth

Topic Sentence: Scientific advancements drive economic growth.
Example 1: In 2019, China’s tech industry boosted its economy.
Example 2: In 2020, India’s IT sector created numerous jobs.
Example 3: In 2021, Germany’s engineering innovations fueled economic development.
Analysis: These examples illustrate that scientific progress can lead to substantial economic benefits.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While science has made significant progress, the belief that science will create a perfect world is a dangerous delusion due to ethical, social, and environmental concerns.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Strive for balanced progress that considers ethical, social, and environmental impacts.

Reading References:

Harari, Yuval Noah. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. 2016.
Joy, Bill. “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us.” Wired, April 2000.
Susskind, Richard. Future Politics: Living Together in a World Transformed by Tech. 2018.
Jasanoff, Sheila. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. 2016.
Bostrom, Nick. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. 2014.

The mark of a civilised society is how they treat their elderly. How far do you agree?

A society’s treatment of its elderly reflects its values and civility. However, other factors, such as economic development, education, and justice, also define a civilised society.

I. Introduction

Hook: The elderly are often seen as a society’s most vulnerable members.
Background: Overview of the importance of treating the elderly with respect and care.
Thesis Statement: A society’s treatment of its elderly reflects its values and civility. However, other factors, such as economic development, education, and justice, also define a civilised society.

II. Supporting View 1: Respect and Care for the Elderly

Topic Sentence: Respect and care for the elderly indicate societal values and civility.
Example 1: In 2021, Japan’s respect for the elderly is evident in its national holiday, Respect for the Aged Day.
Example 2: In 2020, Norway’s comprehensive elder care system showed societal commitment to its elderly.
Example 3: In 2019, Singapore’s Pioneer Generation Package provided extensive support to its elderly population.
Analysis: These examples show that societies which respect and care for their elderly reflect strong moral values.

III. Supporting View 2: Elderly Welfare Programs

Topic Sentence: Effective elderly welfare programs demonstrate a society’s commitment to its members.
Example 1: In 2019, Sweden’s extensive elder care services showcased a robust welfare state.
Example 2: In 2020, Germany’s high-quality nursing homes highlighted its commitment to elderly welfare.
Example 3: In 2018, the Netherlands’ innovative elder care villages promoted dignity and quality of life.
Analysis: These instances illustrate that strong elderly welfare programs are markers of a civilised society.

IV. Supporting View 3: Legal Protections for the Elderly

Topic Sentence: Legal protections for the elderly signify a society’s commitment to justice and human rights.
Example 1: In 2021, South Korea implemented laws against elder abuse, ensuring protection for its elderly.
Example 2: In 2019, the UK strengthened legal frameworks to safeguard elderly rights and welfare.
Example 3: In 2020, Australia introduced elder abuse prevention programs, enhancing legal protections.
Analysis: These examples highlight how legal protections for the elderly reflect a society’s commitment to justice and human rights.

V. Opposing View 1: Economic Development as a Marker

Topic Sentence: Economic development is also a key marker of a civilised society.
Example 1: In 2019, China’s rapid economic growth lifted millions out of poverty.
Example 2: In 2020, India’s technological advancements contributed to national progress.
Example 3: In 2021, Brazil’s infrastructure development improved quality of life.
Analysis: These instances show that economic development significantly contributes to a civilised society.

VI. Opposing View 2: Education and Literacy Rates

Topic Sentence: High education and literacy rates define a civilised society.
Example 1: In 2020, Finland’s top-ranking education system demonstrated societal advancement.
Example 2: In 2019, South Korea’s high literacy rates reflected societal progress.
Example 3: In 2021, Singapore’s focus on education produced a highly skilled workforce.
Analysis: These examples illustrate that education and literacy are crucial indicators of a civilised society.

VII. Opposing View 3: Justice and Legal Systems

Topic Sentence: A fair and effective justice system is a crucial aspect of a civilised society.
Example 1: In 2019, New Zealand’s justice reforms improved fairness and accessibility.
Example 2: In 2020, Denmark’s efficient legal system ensured justice and order.
Example 3: In 2021, Switzerland’s strong legal framework upheld human rights and justice.
Analysis: These instances highlight that justice and legal systems are essential components of a civilised society.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: A society’s treatment of its elderly reflects its values and civility. However, economic development, education, and justice also define a civilised society.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: A civilised society balances respect for its elderly with overall progress in various domains.

The only way to deal with a criminal is to remove him from society. Discuss.

While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

I. Introduction

Hook: Crime remains a significant challenge for societies worldwide.
Background: Overview of traditional and alternative approaches to dealing with criminals.
Thesis Statement: While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

II. Supporting View 1: Public Safety

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals ensures public safety by preventing further harm.
Example 1: In 2020, the UK increased sentences for serious offenders to protect citizens.
Example 2: In 2019, Italy’s anti-mafia operations removed dangerous criminals from society.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia implemented strict measures to detain violent offenders.
Analysis: These examples demonstrate how removing criminals enhances public safety.

III. Supporting View 2: Deterrence

Topic Sentence: Harsh penalties serve as a deterrent to potential criminals.
Example 1: In 2018, Singapore’s strict drug laws deterred drug trafficking.
Example 2: In 2019, Saudi Arabia’s severe penalties for theft reduced crime rates.
Example 3: In 2020, Japan’s tough stance on organised crime deterred criminal activities.
Analysis: These instances show that strict penalties can deter criminal behaviour.

IV. Supporting View 3: Retribution

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals serves as retribution, providing justice for victims.
Example 1: In 2019, India imposed death penalties for heinous crimes, providing closure to victims’ families.
Example 2: In 2020, South Africa’s long prison sentences for violent crimes satisfied public demand for justice.
Example 3: In 2021, France’s life sentences for terrorists offered retribution to affected communities.
Analysis: These examples illustrate how removing criminals satisfies the need for justice and retribution.

V. Opposing View 1: Rehabilitation

Topic Sentence: Rehabilitation offers a chance for criminals to reform and reintegrate.
Example 1: In 2020, Norway’s rehabilitation programmes significantly reduced reoffending rates.
Example 2: In 2019, Sweden’s focus on rehabilitation over punishment led to successful reintegration of offenders.
Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s humane prison system prioritised rehabilitation, showing positive outcomes.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate the effectiveness of rehabilitation in reducing reoffending and promoting reintegration.

VI. Opposing View 2: Restorative Justice

Topic Sentence: Restorative justice addresses the harm caused and promotes healing.
Example 1: In 2018, New Zealand’s restorative justice practices helped victims and offenders reconcile.
Example 2: In 2019, South Africa’s community justice programmes resolved conflicts and healed communities.
Example 3: In 2020, Canada’s restorative justice initiatives reduced recidivism and repaired harm.
Analysis: These instances show how restorative justice can effectively address crime’s impact and promote healing.

VII. Opposing View 3: Social and Economic Costs

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals from society incurs high social and economic costs.
Example 1: In 2020, the UK faced criticism for the high costs of long-term imprisonment.
Example 2: In 2019, Italy struggled with overcrowded prisons and the associated costs.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia debated the financial burden of extensive incarceration policies.
Analysis: These examples highlight the significant social and economic costs of removing criminals from society.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While removing criminals can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer viable alternatives that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: A balanced approach combining removal, rehabilitation, and restorative justice can effectively address crime and promote societal well-being.

The main benefits of science have been material comforts and longer life. Do you agree?

While science has undeniably provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.

I. Introduction

Hook: Science has revolutionised our lives in many ways.
Background: Overview of the impacts of scientific advancements on society.
Thesis Statement: While science has undeniably provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.

II. Supporting View 1: Material Comforts

Topic Sentence: Science has greatly improved material comforts.
Example 1: In 2021, Japan’s advancements in robotics improved household convenience.
Example 2: In 2019, Germany’s renewable energy innovations led to sustainable living.
Example 3: In 2020, South Korea’s smart home technology enhanced everyday comfort.
Analysis: These examples show how scientific advancements have provided significant material comforts.

III. Supporting View 2: Longer Life

Topic Sentence: Science has extended human lifespan.
Example 1: In 2021, the UK’s COVID-19 vaccines saved countless lives.
Example 2: In 2020, Japan’s advancements in geriatric care improved elderly health.
Example 3: In 2019, Singapore’s healthcare innovations increased life expectancy.
Analysis: These instances illustrate how scientific progress has contributed to longer, healthier lives.

IV. Supporting View 3: Improved Quality of Life

Topic Sentence: Science has improved the overall quality of life.
Example 1: In 2020, Sweden’s advancements in clean air technology improved public health.
Example 2: In 2019, Norway’s electric vehicle adoption reduced pollution.
Example 3: In 2018, Switzerland’s medical research advancements provided better disease management.
Analysis: These examples highlight how science has enhanced life quality through health and environmental improvements.

V. Opposing View 1: Environmental Preservation

Topic Sentence: Science has provided material comforts but more significantly science also has contributed to environmental preservation.
Example 1: In 2021, Costa Rica’s use of renewable energy promoted sustainability.
Example 2: In 2019, Kenya’s conservation technology protected wildlife.
Example 3: In 2020, the Netherlands’ water management technology prevented flooding.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate science’s role in protecting and preserving the environment.

VI. Opposing View 2: Global Communication

Topic Sentence: Besides providing material comforts, science has transformed global communication.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s satellite technology improved rural connectivity.
Example 2: In 2019, South Korea’s 5G network revolutionised communication.
Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s internet technology enabled remote working.
Analysis: These examples show how scientific advancements have facilitated better global communication and connectivity.

VII. Opposing View 3: Enhanced Knowledge

Topic Sentence: Science has significantly enhanced human knowledge. This overshadows the aspect of science has provided material comforts.
Example 1: In 2021, CERN’s research in Switzerland advanced our understanding of physics.
Example 2: In 2019, Japan’s space missions provided new insights into the universe.
Example 3: In 2020, China’s AI research pushed the boundaries of technology.
Analysis: These instances illustrate science’s role in expanding our knowledge and understanding of the world.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While science has provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: The true value of science lies in its broad and transformative impact on all aspects of life.

The problems of poverty can only get worse in the current climate. Discuss.

There is no doubt that climate change exacerbates poverty. While current economic and environmental challenges exacerbate poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope for alleviating it.

I. Introduction

Hook: Climate change is catastrophic for the poor. Poverty remains a pressing global issue.
Background: Overview of current economic and environmental challenges.
Thesis Statement: While current economic and environmental challenges exacerbate poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope for alleviating it.

II. Supporting View 1: Economic Inequality

Topic Sentence: Rising economic inequality worsens poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s wealth gap widened, increasing poverty.
Example 2: In 2019, South Africa faced growing economic disparity and poverty.
Example 3: In 2021, Brazil saw increased inequality due to the pandemic.
Analysis: These examples show how economic inequality exacerbates poverty.

III. Supporting View 2: Climate Change

Topic Sentence: Climate change exacerbates poverty by affecting livelihoods.
Example 1: In 2019, Cyclone Idai devastated Mozambique, increasing poverty.
Example 2: In 2020, Australian bushfires harmed agriculture and local economies.
Example 3: In 2021, floods in Germany displaced thousands, worsening poverty.
Analysis: These cases illustrate how climate disasters worsen poverty conditions.

IV. Supporting View 3: Pandemic Impact

Topic Sentence: The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened poverty globally.
Example 1: In 2020, Kenya’s economy suffered, increasing poverty levels.
Example 2: In 2021, Peru faced economic collapse, worsening poverty.
Example 3: In 2020, India’s lockdowns severely impacted the poor.
Analysis: These examples show the pandemic’s significant impact on poverty.

V. Opposing View 1: Innovative Policies

Topic Sentence: Innovative policies can help alleviate poverty.
Example 1: In 2019, Finland’s basic income experiment reduced poverty.
Example 2: In 2021, South Korea’s universal welfare policies helped the poor.
Example 3: In 2020, Germany’s social safety nets supported many during the pandemic.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how innovative policies can reduce poverty.

VI. Opposing View 2: Technological Advancements

Topic Sentence: Technology offers new solutions to combat poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s digital payments increased financial inclusion.
Example 2: In 2019, Kenya’s M-Pesa revolutionised banking for the poor.
Example 3: In 2021, Rwanda’s drone deliveries improved healthcare access.
Analysis: These examples highlight how technology can alleviate poverty.

VII. Opposing View 3: Global Cooperation

Topic Sentence: International cooperation can address global poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, the EU’s recovery fund supported member states in crisis.
Example 2: In 2019, China’s Belt and Road Initiative invested in developing nations.
Example 3: In 2021, the UN’s SDGs targeted global poverty reduction.
Analysis: These instances show the potential of global cooperation to reduce poverty.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While current challenges worsen poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Collective efforts and innovation are essential to combat poverty effectively.

A good leader must be a good follower. Is this necessarily true?

A good leader often benefits from being a good follower, gaining essential skills and insights. However, leadership also requires independent thinking and decisive action, which do not always align with the premise of the question.

I. Introduction

Hook: Leadership and followership are often seen as opposing roles.
Background: Brief overview of leadership qualities and the importance of followership.
Thesis Statement: A good leader often benefits from being a good follower, gaining essential skills and insights. However, leadership also requires independent thinking and decisive action, which do not always align with following.

II. Supporting View 1: Understanding Team Dynamics

Topic Sentence: Good followers understand team dynamics, which is crucial for effective leadership.
Example 1: In 2020, Jacinda Ardern’s collaborative approach in New Zealand showed strong team dynamics.
Example 2: In 2018, Emmanuel Macron’s rise involved understanding and working within different political groups in France.
Example 3: In 2021, Sanna Marin’s leadership in Finland highlighted her ability to engage with her team.
Analysis: These examples show that understanding team dynamics enhances leadership effectiveness.

III. Supporting View 2: Empathy and Support

Topic Sentence: Good followers develop empathy and the ability to support others, crucial for leaders.
Example 1: In 2017, Angela Merkel’s empathetic response to the refugee crisis showed her understanding of people’s needs in Germany.
Example 2: In 2019, Justin Trudeau’s supportive policies in Canada demonstrated empathy.
Example 3: In 2018, Leo Varadkar’s leadership in Ireland reflected his supportive approach to social issues.
Analysis: These cases illustrate how empathy and support are vital leadership qualities developed through good followership.

IV. Supporting View 3: Learning from Leaders

Topic Sentence: Good followers learn from their leaders, which is essential for their own leadership development.
Example 1: In 2018, Theresa May’s experience under David Cameron in the UK shaped her leadership.
Example 2: In 2019, Japan’s Shinzo Abe benefited from his early political roles.
Example 3: In 2020, Pedro Sánchez of Spain grew through his political experiences.
Analysis: These examples highlight how learning from leaders can prepare individuals for their own leadership roles.

V. Opposing View 1: Independent Thinking

Topic Sentence: Leadership requires independent thinking, which does not always align with being a follower.
Example 1: In 2019, Narendra Modi’s decisive actions in India showed independent leadership.
Example 2: In 2018, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman demonstrated independent, sometimes controversial, decisions.
Example 3: In 2020, Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky showed strong independent leadership in crisis.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate how independent thinking is crucial for effective leadership.

VI. Opposing View 2: Decisiveness and Authority

Topic Sentence: Leaders need to make decisive and authoritative decisions, which followers may not always do.
Example 1: In 2021, Boris Johnson’s handling of the UK’s COVID-19 response required decisive leadership.
Example 2: In 2020, South Korea’s Moon Jae-in took decisive actions against COVID-19.
Example 3: In 2019, Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed’s peace efforts required authoritative decisions.
Analysis: These instances show that decisiveness and authority are essential for leadership, sometimes contrasting with followership.

VII. Opposing View 3: Vision and Innovation

Topic Sentence: Effective leaders often have a vision and drive innovation, which followers may lack.
Example 1: In 2020, Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen showed innovative leadership in technology and health.
Example 2: In 2018, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame led with a vision for technological advancement.
Analysis: These examples illustrate that having a vision and driving innovation are key leadership traits.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While being a good follower can enhance leadership skills, effective leadership also requires independent thinking, decisiveness, and vision.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: A balanced approach that integrates followership experiences with independent leadership traits is ideal.

This essay is overly focused on politicians and may not score well, although it has many examples. It is important to provide a broad perspective of where leaders are needed. Leaders can be found in schools, the military, prisons, and any place where hierarchies are required, i.e., even at home.

Affluence is as much a curse as a blessing. Discuss.

I. Introduction

Hook: Wealth is often seen as the key to happiness.
Background: Overview of the advantages and disadvantages of affluence.
Thesis Statement: Affluence brings comfort and opportunities but also leads to social isolation and environmental harm, making it both a curse and a blessing.

II. Supporting View 1: Increased Comfort and Opportunities

Topic Sentence: Affluence provides comfort and numerous opportunities.
Example 1: In 2019, Singapore’s high-income citizens enjoyed excellent healthcare and education.
Example 2: In 2021, Qatar’s wealth funded state-of-the-art infrastructure and public services.
Example 3: In 2018, Switzerland’s affluent society benefited from high living standards and security.
Analysis: These examples show how wealth can improve quality of life and provide opportunities.

III. Supporting View 2: Ability to Support Others

Topic Sentence: Affluent individuals and nations can support others in need.
Example 1: In 2020, Norway donated significant funds for global COVID-19 relief.
Example 2: In 2018, the UAE provided extensive humanitarian aid to war-torn Yemen.
Example 3: In 2021, Germany funded various international development projects.
Analysis: These instances highlight how affluence enables support for less fortunate communities.

IV. Opposing View 1: Social Isolation and Mental Health Issues

Topic Sentence: Affluence can lead to social isolation and mental health problems.
Example 1: In 2021, reports from Japan showed high rates of loneliness among wealthy individuals.
Example 2: In 2019, South Korea saw a rise in mental health issues among its affluent youth.
Example 3: In 2018, the UK reported increased depression rates in wealthy areas.
Analysis: These examples illustrate how wealth can lead to social isolation and mental health struggles.

V. Opposing View 2: Environmental Impact

Topic Sentence: Affluence contributes to significant environmental damage.
Example 1: In 2020, China’s rapid industrialisation led to severe air pollution.
Example 2: In 2019, the UAE’s high consumption rates resulted in significant waste production.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia’s affluent lifestyle contributed to large carbon footprints.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how affluent lifestyles can harm the environment.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Affluence brings comfort and opportunities but also leads to social isolation and environmental harm, making it both a curse and a blessing.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balance the pursuit of wealth with awareness of its potential drawbacks.