Keywords: ‘Evaluate the extent’ and ‘sport and leisure’ and ‘priorities’ and ‘your’.
• Improve the health of the nation
• Constructive use of free time
• Encourage better self-image (e.g. reduce obesity)
• Participate in prestigious world events (e.g. Olympics/World Cup/Youth Olympic Games)
• Promote interest in outside work
• Escapism
• Reduce stress/depression
• Social/family benefits
• There are other financial priorities (education/economic/health/welfare)
• Basic survival
• Could just cater for a minority
• Too obsessed with winning (e.g. China/Russia)
Going Green is a luxury only rich nations can afford. Comment
The environmental issues plaguing the world today have led to many calls to save the environment. While environmental protection is necessary, many believe that going green is a luxury that only rich nations can afford. However, it can be contended that this perception is flawed. Going green is not a luxury but a responsibility that both rich and poor nations should shoulder together as both these groups have damaged the environment.
Developing nations believe that rich nations can have the luxury to go green because they are economically strong. Developed nations have undergone rapid industrialisation which has equipped them economically to adopt programmes and strategies to protect the environment. For example, countries like the United States have invested $150 billion dollars between the year 2009-2015 in renewables and other forms of cleantech. Such a luxury cannot be afforded by poorer or developing nations. Furthermore, the developing nations lack the technical know-how and the expertise to build complex infrastructure to accommodate alternate sources of energy like hydroelectrical powerplants and nuclear plants. Apart from the US, countries like Japan and Germany have invested billions in undertaking environmental protection programmes and strategies. This is only possible because these countries are already industrialised and have the necessary economic power to efficiently implement these programs. Therefore, going green is a luxury that only rich nations can afford because developing nations do not have the necessary infrastructure.
However, this is a myopic view of a serious issue that concerns everyone from rich as well as poor nations. It is unfair to put all the responsibility on the rich nations while the developing nations continue to act irresponsibly towards the environment. Developing nations too need to shoulder the responsibility of going green because it is not a matter of luxury but survival. For example, developing economies like China is the largest carbon emitter in the world both in terms of production and consumption. Similarly, in Brazil man-made fires in the Amazon for clearing land cause CO2 emissions that are detrimental to the environment. In such cases, it becomes clear that expecting rich nations to go green is unjust, especially when developing nations continue to pollute and damage the environment. Thus, going green is not a luxury but a responsibility that both rich and poor nations need to afford.
Some might argue that the damage to the environment is not that serious. Moreover, as developed nations have caused the most environmental damage through industrialisation, they should be the ones to afford the luxury of going green. They also argue that developed nations can implement green policies and build green estates. Rich nations collectively can afford to go green while giving the developing nations their chance to build the necessary cash reserves. Therefore, going green is not a luxury that developing nations cannot afford.
However, this argument is flawed because the environmental damage is not only affecting the developed nations. Many studies have shown how climate change and global warming is affecting the world. For example, a study by NASA has found that the rate of global sea-level rise has been accelerating in recent decades, rather than increasing steadily. This put several nations at risk of being completely submerged. Countries like Brazil are already facing the challenges of global warming with long droughts, excessive rains, and uncontrolled fires are all becoming a normal part of life. The rapid environmental damage is showing the consequences all across the world. All these consequences are a testament to the fact that going green is not a responsibility of only rich nations. Therefore, going green is a luxury and responsibility that both rich and poor nations need to undertake.
In conclusion, there is a need for collective efforts from both the rich and the poor nations. It is true that green technologies cannot be adopted by all nations. However, all nations can implement necessary strategies to mitigate environmental damage with proper policies and political will. It is essential that instead of blaming each other both rich and poor nations put in a joint effort to save the planet from the environmental catastrophe.
‘Unless there is the freedom to give offence there is no freedom of expression.’ How far do you agree?
Possible Points for unless there is the freedom to give offence there is no freedom of expression
• Different societies may view some things as offensive but others not
• It may be that religious beliefs can cause offence or vice-versa
• Need to be able to express one’s opinion through literature, art and dance
• There may be opinions/views that are simply inadmissible in any circumstances
• Human beings diminish themselves by refusing to consider others’ feelings
‘Sugar is the new tobacco.’ Consider the relevance of this statement.
• Tobacco has health warnings but sugar does not
• Children are targeted in adverts, especially sugary drinks and sweets
• Tobacco is banned for below a certain age but children are targeted in supermarkets
• Sugar contributes to obesity and other life-threatening diseases
• Nature of addiction
Research using animals has reached an all-time high. How far is this ethical?
For/Against points for Research using animals has reached an all-time high.
• Do animals have rights?
• Do we not have a responsibility towards animals?
• Done for the greater good of humans
• Research using animals may find a cure for diseases
‘Hosting major sporting events create more problems than benefits.’ Do you agree?
Hosting major sporting events have actually done the hosting countries and their people more good than bad. One cannot agree with the statement that ‘hosting major sporting events create more problems than benefits.’ To argue my case, this essay will examine the economic benefits for hosting major events, how will the society benefit and what will the governments of the hosting countries gain. The discussion shall be largely confined to the Olympic Games, the F1 formulae race and the World Cup. Hosting major events may be defined as a national project to provide a platform for the best sportsmen and sportswomen all around the world to compete with each other.
The increase in revenues from tourist spending, air flights, sponsorships by both local and overseas companies, broadcasting fees, tickets for seats and merchandising of products related to the major sporting events bring huge economic benefits to the hosting countries. Singapore for example recently held the F1 formulae race. The F1 race being a major sporting event attracted many F1 fans from all over the world to come to Singapore to watch it. As a result, more tourists flew to Singapore and more revenues are earned from the increased air flights. Due to the surge in tourists coming to Singapore, more hotel rooms are also being booked during the F1 race period. Recently, a survey done in Singapore also shows that a tourist who came to watch F1 race in Singapore last year far exceeded the spending of a normal tourist. This has helped to improve the Singapore economy. However, the hosting of a major sporting event also involved high costs. Money is needed to build new infrastructures and facilities like stadiums and roads if they are not adequate or up to international standards to host the event. To make the event successful, the country will also need to pay high amount to attract professionals to organize the event so that the sporting event is run smoothly and safely. In addition, the country will have to provide prize money, free lodging and entertainment for the sportsmen and sportswomen that came for the event. All these things involve costs but the point is some of these cost can actually be saved or covered by other revenues. For example, Singapore saved the cost and trouble of building extra roads and upgrading of roads for the F1 race because the roads are adequate and already well built. The country can also get sponsorships from both local and overseas companies and use profits from ticket sales and merchandising of products related to the event to cover the cost. If the sports event is a success, the country will have high chances of hosting the same or other different major sporting events and this will bring in more tourists in the future. Therefore, the economic benefits far outweigh the cost involve in hosting the event.
The society benefits from the surge of tourists coming to watch the major sporting events. For example, the F1 race in Singapore created many jobs in the service sectors. Hotels, restaurants and places of entertainment will need to hire more people to handle the extra customers. This will help to solve the problem of unemployment and benefit the society. Shops will also earn more profits from the spending of the tourists. The service sector will also improve in the sense that firms will want to attract more tourists to spend and to do this, they will need to improve their service attitude. However, the surge of tourists can also create social problems. There are cases of tourists drunk and getting into fights with the local people causing unrest to the society. However, most tourists are well behaved and those very few tourists causing trouble are dealt with appropriately without causing additional troubles. In addition, if the laws of the hosting countries are strict, tourists will need to think twice before getting into fights or any other activities that cause harm to the society.
The building of new infrastructures and facilities for hosting the sports events also benefit the society. For example, China the country which hosted the recent Olympic Games needed to build stadiums, swimming pools, tennis court, lodging place and many other facilities that are of world-class standards. Many people think that it’s a waste of money to build new infrastructures and facilities because these buildings cost millions of dollars to build. Moreover, the usage of the facilities after the event is questionable. However, the process of building these infrastructures have already benefit people by create job opportunities in the construction sector. After the infrastructure is being built, the China Olympic Stadium which looked liked a bird’s nest outside, for example, becomes a majestic view for the Chinese. It will inevitably become a place for the Chinese and the tourist to tour in the future. In addition, after the world class infrastructures and facilities are built, sportsmen and sportswomen can make use of the excellent facilities to train and improve their abilities. Furthermore, future major sports events can be hosted in these well built facilities and infrastructures.
Hosting major sports events can help unite people together and this will allow the government to achieve one of her political goals. When a country decides to host a major sporting event, lots of help is needed from the citizens to make the event successful. In the case of the F1 race hosted in Singapore last year, Singaporeans become more united in the sense that they all work together to achieve a common goal and that goal was the make the first F1 race in Singapore a successful one. Along the process, there will be conflicts among people working together. People from all over the world will judge Singaporeans on how well they will be at hosing such a major sporting event. However, these problems will be removed as Singaporeans will naturally unite and work together to show that they can do it. During the 2002 World Cup held by Japan and South Korea, the South Koreans unite together and cheered their team on strongly and in the end the South Korea team emerged fourth position which is their highest position in history. All these examples show that hosting major sports events is a good way to bond people in the country together.
The hosting of major sports events helps hosting countries improve their economy, creates a better society and achieve their political goals. More importantly, the hosting of a major sporting event creates history for the country, something that is invaluable.
Essay Questions on Youth and Children.
GP Essay Questions on Youth. Have a look at these GP Essay Questions on Youth from the past papers.
- “The young people of today think of nothing but themselves. They have no reverence for parents or old age. They are impatient of all restraint. They talk as if they alone know everything.” These words were written many years ago. Are they true today?
- Young people are slaves to fashion. Discuss.
- ‘The teenage years are the best years of one’s life.’ Would you agree with this view?
- Consider the criticism levelled at young people that their only values are self-centred ones.
- Is it true that the old must now learn from the young?
- Discuss the reasons for crime among young people and the ways in which they can be encouraged to behave differently.
- Was life for young people in Singapore better in the past than it is today?
- To what extent are the young in Singapore favoured at the expense of the elderly?
- Discuss the view that children always suffer when both parents work.
- Should people be allowed to have children by artificial means?
Evaluate the possible advantages of apprenticeships and training in the work place over school and college courses.
Possible Points for advantages of apprenticeships and training in the workplace
• Hands-on experience useful when applying for a job
• Some young people prefer using practical skills
• May have a small wage
• Useful for businesses
• Academics are important to deliver leadership in education and health
• Also can have a combination of both, e.g. hospitals and schools
Protected: Assess what distinguishes a successful film from an unsuccessful one.
‘Powerful nations are far more inward-looking than weaker ones.’ How far do you agree?
Possible Points for/against powerful nations are more inward-looking than weaker ones.
• May look at the geography and history of these nations
• Limited knowledge of other nations arising from lack of interest
• No need to align themselves with other nations
• Weaker nations are more motivated to look beyond their borders
• Power has to be kept; the powerless have other priorities