How true is it that people who crave danger have nothing better to do with their lives?

While some people who crave danger may lack fulfilling alternatives, many seek thrill for personal growth, achievement, and mental health benefits, challenging the notion that they have “nothing better to do.”

While some people who crave danger may lack fulfilling alternatives, many seek thrill for personal growth, achievement, and mental health benefits, challenging the notion that they have “nothing better to do.”

I. Introduction

  • Hook: Those who crave danger are mindless and selfish.
  • Background: Overview of the reasons behind thrill-seeking behaviour.
  • Thesis Statement: Craving danger is not necessarily due to a lack of better alternatives; it can be motivated by personal growth, achievement, and mental health benefits.

II. Supporting View 1: Lack of Purpose and Alternatives

  • Topic Sentence: Some crave danger as there might not be better alternatives.
  • Example 1: Urban exploration in abandoned buildings in the UK (2019-2021). Young people explore dangerous sites due to boredom and lack of opportunities (source: The Guardian, 2019).
  • Example 2: Illegal street racing in South Africa (2018-2021) as a thrill-seeking activity.
    • Context: Participants often lack access to structured motorsport opportunities (source: BBC, 2020).
  • Example 3: Cliff jumping in Greece (2017-2021) among unemployed youth.
    • Context: High unemployment rates drive young people to seek thrills (source: Reuters, 2018).
  • Analysis: For some, thrill-seeking fills a void created by lack of purpose or opportunities.

III. Supporting View 2: Personal Growth and Achievement

  • Topic Sentence: Some crave danger for thrill-seeking high. They feel that such danger is good for personal growth.
  • Example 1: Mountaineering in Nepal (2016-2021) as a personal challenge. Climbers aim to conquer Everest for personal accomplishment (source: The Guardian, 2019).
  • Example 2: Free solo climbing in Europe (2017-2021) by professional athletes. Athletes push their limits for achievement and recognition (source: BBC, 2018).
  • Example 3: Ultra-marathon running in the Sahara (2018-2021) for extreme endurance.
    • Context: Participants test their physical and mental limits (source: Reuters, 2019).
  • Analysis: Personal growth and the pursuit of achievement drive many to seek dangerous activities.

IV. Supporting View 3: Mental Health Benefits

  • Topic Sentence: Some who crave danger and thrill opine that such adventure can provide significant mental health benefits.
  • Example 1: Skydiving in New Zealand (2016-2021) as therapy for PTSD. Veterans use extreme sports to cope with trauma (source: The Guardian, 2018).
  • Example 2: Bungee jumping in Switzerland (2017-2021) for adrenaline therapy. Participants report reduced anxiety and stress levels (source: BBC, 2019).
  • Example 3: Adventure racing in South Africa (2018-2021) for depression. Outdoor challenges improve mental health and well-being (source: Reuters, 2020).
  • Analysis: Thrill-seeking activities can offer therapeutic benefits and improve mental health.

V. Opposing View 1: Thrill-Seeking as a Distraction from Life’s Issues

  • Topic Sentence: Some use thrill-seeking as a distraction from personal problems.
  • Example 1: BASE jumping in Norway (2017-2021) as an escape.
  • Participants often seek relief from personal stresses (source: The Guardian, 2020).
  • Example 2: High-risk skateboarding in Spain (2018-2021) to avoid life pressures. Young people turn to extreme sports to cope with societal pressures (source: BBC, 2019).
  • Example 3: Parkour in France (2019-2021) to escape urban life challenges.
    • Context: Practitioners use parkour to navigate and escape urban stress (source: Reuters, 2020).
  • Analysis: For some, thrill-seeking serves as a means of escaping personal or societal issues.

VI. Opposing View 2: Thrill-Seeking Due to Societal Influence

  • Topic Sentence: Societal and cultural influences drive some people to seek danger.
  • Example 1: Extreme sports in Japan (2018-2021) influenced by media. Media glorification of extreme sports increases participation (source: BBC, 2020).
  • Example 2: Adventure tourism in Iceland (2017-2021) driven by social media. Social media trends encourage risky tourist behaviours (source: Reuters, 2019).
  • Example 3: Dangerous stunts in Russia (2019-2021) inspired by online challenges. Viral internet challenges push people towards risky activities (source: The Guardian, 2021).
  • Analysis: Societal and cultural pressures can significantly influence thrill-seeking behaviour.

VII. Opposing View 3: Controlled Risk-Taking as Part of Professional Pursuits

  • Topic Sentence: For some, thrill-seeking is an integral part of their personal and professional pursuits.
  • Example 1: Professional stunt performers in the UK (2016-2021). Thrill-seeking is part of their job and skill set (source: BBC, 2019).
  • Example 2: Scientific research expeditions in Antarctica (2017-2021). Researchers face extreme conditions for scientific discovery (source: Reuters, 2020).
  • Example 3: Wildlife photographers in Africa (2018-2021). Documenting wildlife requires facing dangerous environments (source: The Guardian, 2021).
  • Analysis: For professionals, thrill-seeking is often a necessary and calculated part of their careers.

VIII. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: Craving danger is not necessarily due to a lack of better alternatives; it can be motivated by personal growth, achievement, and mental health benefits.
  • Summary of Key Points: Lack of purpose, personal growth, mental health versus distraction, societal influence, professional pursuits.
  • Final Thought: Understanding the diverse motivations behind thrill-seeking can help address misconceptions and provide better support for those engaged in such activities.

Tourism will be the death of the environment. Discuss.

Tourism significantly impacts the environment through resource depletion and pollution, but sustainable practices and regulations can mitigate these effects, preventing tourism from being the death of the environment.

Tourism significantly impacts the environment through resource depletion and pollution, but sustainable practices and regulations can mitigate these effects, preventing tourism from being the death of the environment.

I. Introduction

  • Hook: There is little doubt that tourism is paving the way to environmental ruin.
  • Background: Overview of tourism’s impact on the environment.
  • Thesis Statement: Tourism has severe environmental impacts, but sustainable practices and regulations can prevent it from being the death of the environment.

II. Supporting View 1: Resource Depletion and Habitat Destruction

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism significantly impacts the environment primarily through resource depletion and habitat destruction.
  • Example 1: Thailand’s over-tourism (2018-2021) led to the closure of Maya Bay. Coral reefs damaged by excessive tourist activity (source: BBC, 2018).
  • Example 2: Maldives’ water scarcity (2017-2021) exacerbated by high tourist demand. Freshwater resources strained, affecting local populations (source: Reuters, 2020).
  • Example 3: Iceland’s fragile ecosystems (2015-2021) threatened by rapid tourism growth. Increased foot traffic led to soil erosion and habitat loss (source: The Guardian, 2019).
  • Analysis: Tourism can severely deplete natural resources and destroy habitats, necessitating urgent action.

III. Supporting View 2: Pollution and Waste

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism significantly impacts the environment as it is a primary contributor to environmental pollution and waste.
  • Example 1: Bali’s waste crisis (2017-2021) worsened by tourism. Beaches polluted with plastic waste from tourists (source: BBC, 2019).
  • Example 2: Venice’s air and water pollution (2015-2021) due to cruise ships. Ships emitted pollutants, harming air quality and marine life (source: BBC, 2020).
  • Example 3: Mount Everest’s litter problem (2018-2021) from climbing expeditions. Climbing activities left the mountain strewn with waste (source: The Guardian, 2024).
  • Analysis: Tourist activities generate significant pollution and waste, posing serious environmental threats.

IV. Supporting View 3: Climate Change and Carbon Footprint

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism significantly impacts the environment by exacerbating climate change.
  • Example 1: Increased flights to New Zealand (2016-2021) raised carbon emissions. Tourist flights contributed to rising greenhouse gases (source: BBC, 2018).
  • Example 2: Carbon footprint of Mediterranean tourism (2017-2021) increased. High tourist numbers led to more emissions from travel and accommodation (source: Reuters, 2019).
  • Example 3: Kenya’s wildlife tourism (2015-2021) impacted by climate change. Increased emissions from tourism affected local climates and wildlife habitats (source: Al Jazeera, 2020).
  • Analysis: Tourism significantly contributes to carbon emissions, worsening climate change.

V. Opposing View 1: Sustainable Tourism Practices

  • Topic Sentence: Sustainable tourism practices can prevent tourism from being the main factor in environmental degradation.
  • Example 1: Bhutan’s high-value, low-impact tourism model (2016-2021). Controlled tourist numbers minimized environmental impact (source: Reuters, 2023).
  • Example 2: Costa Rica’s ecotourism (2015-2021) promoted conservation. Ecotourism initiatives protected biodiversity and supported local economies (source: BBC, 2019).
  • Example 3: Norway’s fjord regulations (2017-2021) restricted cruise ship emissions. Policies reduced pollution in fjord regions (source: Reuters, 2020).
  • Analysis: Sustainable tourism models can significantly reduce environmental impacts.

VI. Opposing View 2: Economic and Conservation Benefits

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism provides economic and conservation benefits that can offset environmental damage.
  • Example 1: Kenya’s wildlife tourism (2016-2021) funded conservation efforts. Revenue from tourism supported wildlife protection programs (source: Al Jazeera, 2020).
  • Example 2: Galápagos Islands tourism (2017-2021) funded ecological preservation. Tourist fees financed conservation projects and controlled access (source: Harvard International Review, 2023).
  • Example 3: Nepal’s trekking tourism (2015-2021) boosted local economies. Tourism revenue supported local communities and conservation (source: The Guardian, 2018).
  • Analysis: Tourism can provide critical funding for conservation and local economies, balancing environmental impacts.

VII. Opposing View 3: Technological Innovations and Policies

  • Topic Sentence: Technological innovations and policies can mitigate tourism’s environmental impact.
  • Example 1: Smart tourism in Singapore (2016-2021) using technology to manage tourist flows. Reduced overcrowding and environmental impact (source: The Straits Times, 2020).
  • Example 2: Italy’s restrictions on Venice tourism (2017-2021) to protect the city. Policies limited tourist numbers and reduced pollution (source: Reuters, 2019).
  • Example 3: Sweden’s green flight technology (2018-2021) to reduce aviation emissions. Innovations in aircraft design lowered carbon footprints (source: The Guardian, 2020).
  • Analysis: Technological advancements and regulations can significantly mitigate the environmental impacts of tourism.

VIII. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: Tourism significantly impacts the environment, but sustainable practices and regulations can prevent it from being the death of the environment.
  • Summary of Key Points: Resource depletion, pollution, climate change versus sustainable practices, economic benefits, technological innovations.
  • Call to Action: Encourage responsible tourism and support policies that mitigate environmental impacts.
  • Final Thought: Balancing tourism with environmental sustainability is crucial for preserving the planet.

Is there a justifiable need for wildlife?

Wildlife is essential for ecological balance, scientific research, and cultural value. However, some argue it conflicts with human needs and development.

I. Introduction

II. Supporting View 1: Ecological Balance

  • Topic Sentence: Wildlife maintains ecological balance and supports ecosystems.
  • Example 1: In Kenya, elephants help shape the landscape and promote biodiversity.
  • Example 2: In India, tigers control herbivore populations, preserving forest health.
  • Example 3: In Australia, bees pollinate crops, vital for food production.
  • Analysis: These examples show how wildlife is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems.

III. Supporting View 2: Scientific Research

  • Topic Sentence: Wildlife is invaluable for scientific research and medical advancements.
  • Example 1: In Costa Rica, studying frogs leads to medical breakthroughs.
  • Example 2: In Madagascar, lemurs provide insights into evolutionary biology.
  • Example 3: In Tanzania, chimpanzee research aids understanding of human behaviour.
  • Analysis: These cases illustrate the importance of wildlife for scientific progress and health benefits.

IV. Opposing View 1: Conflict with Human Needs

  • Topic Sentence: Wildlife sometimes conflicts with human needs and safety.
  • Example 1: In India, human-tiger conflicts result in fatalities and livestock loss.
  • Example 2: In South Africa, elephants damage crops, impacting farmers’ livelihoods.
  • Example 3: In Australia, sharks pose a risk to swimmers and surfers.
  • Analysis: These examples highlight the challenges of coexisting with wildlife.

V. Opposing View 2: Hindrance to Development

  • Topic Sentence: Wildlife conservation can hinder economic development and infrastructure projects.
  • Example 1: In Brazil, protecting the Amazon rainforest limits agricultural expansion.
  • Example 2: In China, preserving pandas restricts urban development in certain areas.
  • Example 3: In Kenya, wildlife reserves sometimes limit land available for housing.
  • Analysis: These instances show how wildlife conservation can conflict with development goals.

VI. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: Wildlife is essential for ecological balance, scientific research, and cultural value, but it can conflict with human needs and development.
  • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
  • Final Thought: Strive for a balanced approach that values both wildlife conservation and human progress.

Tourism is unnecessary. To what extent do you agree?

I. Introduction

  • Hook: In the era of climate change and globalisation, the necessity of tourism is increasingly questioned.
  • Background: Brief overview of the tourism industry’s role in the global economy and its environmental and cultural impacts.
  • Thesis Statement: While some argue that tourism is unnecessary due to its environmental impact and cultural commodification, it remains a vital industry that fosters economic growth, cultural exchange, and global understanding, demonstrating that its benefits outweigh the drawbacks when managed sustainably.

II. Supporting View 1: Environmental Impact

  • Topic Sentence: Critics argue that tourism is unnecessary because it significantly harms the environment.
  • Example 1: The environmental degradation caused by mass tourism in popular destinations like Venice, where over-tourism has led to pollution and the destruction of local ecosystems.
  • Example 2: The carbon footprint of air travel, which contributes to global warming and climate change, as highlighted by studies from organisations like the International Air Transport Association (IATA).
  • Analysis: Discuss how these examples demonstrate the substantial negative impact of tourism on the environment, supporting the argument that it is unnecessary.

III. Supporting View 2: Cultural Commodification

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism often leads to the commodification of cultures, undermining their authenticity and value.
  • Example 1: The transformation of indigenous practices into tourist attractions, which can strip cultural traditions of their original meaning and context, as seen with the Maasai tribes in Kenya.
  • Example 2: The proliferation of “Disneyfication” in historic cities, where cultural heritage sites are altered to meet tourist expectations, diminishing their historical significance, as observed in cities like Prague.
  • Analysis: Examine how these examples illustrate the cultural costs of tourism, arguing that such commodification diminishes its value.

IV. Opposing View 1: Economic Growth

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism is a critical driver of economic growth and development, particularly in developing countries.
  • Example 1: The economic boom experienced by countries like Thailand, where tourism significantly contributes to GDP, job creation, and infrastructure development.
  • Example 2: The role of tourism in revitalising rural and economically disadvantaged areas, such as the Scottish Highlands, where it supports local businesses and communities.
  • Analysis: Discuss how these examples highlight the economic benefits of tourism, demonstrating its necessity for economic sustainability.

V. Opposing View 2: Cultural Exchange and Global Understanding

  • Topic Sentence: Tourism promotes cultural exchange and global understanding, fostering peace and mutual respect.
  • Example 1: Educational and cultural exchange programmes, such as study abroad opportunities, which enhance intercultural competence and global awareness among students.
  • Example 2: Community-based tourism initiatives, like those in Costa Rica, which allow tourists to engage with local cultures in meaningful ways, promoting sustainable practices and mutual respect.
  • Analysis: Explore how these examples show the positive impact of tourism on cultural understanding and global cooperation, underscoring its value.

VI. Conclusion

  • Restate Thesis: While tourism faces criticisms for its environmental and cultural impacts, its role in driving economic growth, cultural exchange, and global understanding affirms its necessity, provided it is managed sustainably.
  • Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views discussed.
  • Final Thought: Emphasise the need for sustainable tourism practices that mitigate negative impacts while maximising benefits, ensuring that tourism remains a valuable and necessary part of global society.

‘The world is shrinking fast but not necessarily coming together.’ Discuss.

The world has been shrinking fast in part due to globalization. Other factors that may have made the world smaller is telecommunication, transport and cheap budget travel. However, there are still international disputes and arguments that continue to plague the globe. Some might argue that there have been instances where countries have established some forms of cooperative ties with each other, but the reality is that there are massive divisions in the world of today. Therefore, the world is not coming together.

Technological advancement in transportation and communication has led to increased international trade between countries. This has allowed countries to be more integrated economically which has contributed to more trade. Countries have established free trade agreements with each other and have also formed supra-national bodies to serve their economic interest leading to more economic integration. One such international organization would be the Organisation of Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD). The OECD improves trade and cooperation not just among its own members but with several dozen countries who are not members.

Announced in 2013, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI, also known as One Belt, One Road) by China aims to strengthen trade connectivity in the world. It combines new and old projects, covers an expansive geographic scope, and includes efforts to strengthen hard infrastructure, soft infrastructure, and cultural ties.  While this initiative is primarily designed to help China’s economy, the plan impacts 138 countries with a combined Gross Domestic Product of $29 trillion and some 4.6 billion people. It would be myopic to say that the world is not coming together for mutual prosperity and benefit.

But surprisingly, there are many political leaders that embrace a noxious brew of nationalism and authoritarianism. The mix varies from place to place but typically entails the rejection of international institutions and rules. There is little new in the critique of an unjust global order. But if once that critique tended to be rooted in international solidarity, today it stems chiefly from an inward-looking populism that celebrates narrow social and political identity, vilifies minorities and migrants, assails the rule of law and independence of the press, and elevates national sovereignty above all else. Myanmar’s mass expulsion of 700,000 Rohingya, the Syrian regime’s brutal suppression of a popular uprising, the Cameroonian government’s apparent determination to crush an Anglophone insurgency rather than tackle the grievances fueling it, the Venezuelan government’s economic warfare against its own people, and the silencing of dissent in Turkey, Egypt, and elsewhere are but a few examples. It would be difficult to accept the view that the world is coming together.

If the above view is to be dismissed as idiosyncratic geopolitics, let us not forget the annexation of Crimea by Russia and how China obstructs the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea and arbitrarily detains Canadian citizens—including the international crisis workers. Saudi Arabia has pushed the envelope with the war in Yemen, the kidnapping of a Lebanese prime minister, and the gruesome murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi in its consulate in Istanbul. Iran plots attacks against dissidents on European soil. Israel feels emboldened to undermine ever more systematically the foundations of a possible two-state solution.

The world may have come together to defeat a common enemy like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, but let us not forget who supplied them with weapons in the first place. The world may have come together to solve the environment problem, but let us not forget that little has been done to set large polluters like USA and China straight. To boot, Japan is the biggest consumer of fossil fuels in the world and the fifth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases.  While the world has come together to solve the Covid19 problem, there is a lot of finger-pointing. The world is shrinking as communication and transport systems bridge the chasm, but the truth is that geopolitics has prevented real lasting close relationships.

How significant is income from tourism to your country?

Possible points for significance of income from tourism

• What proportion of GDP is a result of tourism?
• How much foreign currency flows in thanks to tourism.
• How much employment is created by tourism?
• Any spin-offs such as inward investment/establishment of multi-nationals?
• Any visible benefits to infrastructure and/or the environment?
• Improvement in living standards?

‘Modern transportation has brought the world closer together.’ How far is this beneficial?

In 1962, when the U.S President John F. Kennedy spoke to the American people and the rest of the world on the American Space Project which aimed to put Americans on the moon and begin a new form of travel, he helped to revive the sense of unbridled opportunity and hope in a tumultuous world arena plagued by Cold War politics. He famously said, “We (the USA) choose to go to the moon and do all the things we do, not because they are easy but because they are hard.” It was indeed amazing to see that something as simple as a new means of transportation being generated by the space race could rally a nation like America, and usher in a revolution upon the already existing modern transportation methods and infrastructure, connecting people, businesses, governments and more, together in ways people never thought was possible just a few centuries ago. Arguably, the latest advent of modern transportation has been drawn into one of the greatest conflicts of modern human history: transnational terrorism, which has in many cases brought the world to its feet. Thankfully, that pessimistic outlook is overshadowed by transportation developments in defense. Also, we should not forget that modern transportation has developed trade, tourism and even systems for commerce, through the effect of bringing the world closer together than ever before. It may very likely be the case that modern transportation is largely beneficial, although we must first dig deeper in order to come to a conclusion.

Undoubtedly, modern transportation has made the world so close, such that transportation itself has become both a target for terrorism, and a vehicle for it. Terrorism is certainly one of the greatest worldwide concerns at present, regardless of whether current approaches are effective or not. Modern methods of transportation such as mass transit through trains for instance, have proven to be alluring targets for terrorists. In an enclosed, moving space, people are put at their most vulnerable. The first thing that one may think of when getting on a train or plane, is not whether terrorists will mount an attack within the vehicle, but rather about simply getting from point A to point B. Too many times, have radical extremists taken advantage of this, as seen for example, in the 1995 gassing of the Tokyo Subway by a cult group known as Aum Shinrykyo, killing 12 and injuring thousands. Modern transportation has actually made the idea of mass transit scarier than ever before. After all, practically everyone will recall the events of 9/11 whenever they pass through airport security today. 9/11 was the most deadly set of attacks on U.S soil thus far. Al Qaeda agents hijacked United Airlines and US Airways planes and deliberately crashed then into the World Trade Center towers in New York City, the Pentagon in Washington DC and into a rural field in Pennsylvania. Certainly, modern transportation methods have brought terrorists closer to us. Despite this, the above effects have motivated governments to step up security throughout transport networks, such as that of stringent security checks at ports of entry and exit. Indeed, while one incident is one too many, transportation in itself has helped to guard against such attacks by creating increased vigilance, and arguably has also contributed to a rise in new methods of warfare against terrorism.

New methods of transportation have helped greatly in the war on terror, providing a safer and more collaborative method of warfare. Many of such transportation methodologies have existed prior to the outbreak of international terrorism, while other are more recent developments. Take drones, unmanned artillery vehicles as an example. By being able to transport weapons and use them remotely has arguably saved a lot of the costs incurred by flying F-35 jets into war zones, although the latter is still being used frequently. It reduces the potential for casualties by targeting specific areas or people that should be eliminated. B-52 bomber planes have also returned to the Middle East zone of conflict in a bid to sustain the war efforts. Unlike commercial jets, these military jets not just transports military personnel, they can also hold great amounts of ammunition, weapons, bombs and other military equipment. Couple this with the international resolve to defeat terrorism by countries like Britain and France, and even to some extent, Russia, militaries have been able to execute their missions more effectively than having boots on the ground. This resolve shows the hope of all countries to finally putting a stop to terrorism can be put into efficient action. In that light, international terrorism has become less of a problem when we know that there are also good stewards of modern methods of transportation.

Moving on to the economy, modern methods of transportation has most certainly helped to forge new business ties between countries, and even between countries and firms themselves. This can ultimately be linked back to the globalization of economic activity, where transportation technologies have increased global connectivity and are still slated to continue improving. We see this manifesting thorough the growth of international trade and flow of Foreign Direct Investment. The European Union for example, allowed the free movement within the 27 countries that it is made up of. The elimination of border checkpoints allows a smoother commute either via air or train, allowing businesses to move their staff ever more easily from country to country to maximize productivity. Modern transport methods have essentially made the possibility of various countries becoming cores of economic activity a reality. Singapore itself is a transportation hub with the world’s best airport, as rated by Skytrax, and one of the busiest maritime ports in the region and the world. Even methods of transporting commodities, such as undersea oil pipelines or oil tankers have given rise to the oil refining industry in Singapore, which generates a huge part of our GDP. All these methods of transportation bring long-run benefits, as business will continue to develop wherever it is conducive and physically connectable to do so. Hence, we are seeing that modern methods of transportation are indeed beneficial to a large extent.

Modern transportation has likewise created or improved new commerce systems that create a more personal connection between customers and firms, thereby bringing about greater consumer experiences that fuel the growth of the retail industry, particularly online. The rise of e-commerce is perhaps, another phenomenon of this increasingly close world. With methods like airfreight and containerized shipping, transactions have become more efficient, cheap and fast. Take Amazon.com, the world’s largest airline retailer for example. As a result of business deals with air freight carriers like UPS and DHL, Amazon is able to get their products into the hands of their international customers in as little as 2 days. This inevitably creates greater efficiency and productivity for the firm. Recently, Amazon even introduced its own brand of air freighters known as “Prime Air”. Such a development was meant to improve shipping reliability for its “Prime” customers, just one of the many modes of transport that they are taking advantage of in order to provide a better and more competitive customer experience. As modern methods of transportation further connect the world, ecommerce is likely to keep booming, and that has a profoundly positive impact on the world economy.

Finally, modern transportation has transformed the tourism industry, bringing people across the world to learn and experience the different faces of the world, thereby leading to both economic and social benefits. The development of tourism not just has to do with improved aircraft, but also maritime vessels, which serve as means for holiday cruises. Now, people can get up close with the glaciers of Alaska, or the majestic coasts of South Australia, places which are generally harder to get to on foot or via automobile. With ports of call at many locations, it increases the accessibility of many more locations. Moving on to commercial jet aircraft, the Boeing 787 Dreamliner is one of the most fuel-efficient planes in the world at present, and has grown to be to backbone of many airline carriers’ long-haul operations. Greater fuel efficiency and customer-centric amenities have not only made unconventional air routes more profitable, but also enabled the connection of culture. In 2016 alone, U.S-based United Airlines has launched a plethora of new routes from their hub in San Francisco, California, to places like Xi’an, China, Singapore and Auckland, New Zealand. This is enabled the phasing out of stopovers, transforming the way people travel long haul. We could still argue that tourism “broadens one’s mind”, but ultimately, the onus of that is on the tourist, not the method of transportation. Certainly, tourism may not always be beneficial for all. Take African Savannah vacations and their effects on natives as an example. Nonetheless, new transportation methods have still managed to make that trip more sustainable, from increased consumer experience, to lower carbon emissions. Hence, it could very well be the case that modern methods of transportation bring the world closer than ever before is indeed beneficial.

In conclusion, modern methods of transportation have greatly affected all of our lives, in one way or another, and the world has never been brought closer together than before. From a pessimists’ point of view, this would open the door to threats unimaginable. Still, as history and reality have also proven to an even stronger extent, the effects of new methods of transportation have brought tremendous economic and social benefit, and from the way, transport is still developing now, a new sustainable future of transport awaits on the horizon.

The growth of tourism is a threat to the environment. Discuss.

Tourism is an activity with roots that can be traced as far as people visiting the Roman baths, becoming a fashion in Europe since the 17th century. Today, tourism represents more than an activity or a fashion, it is an industry which brings great contribution or even keeps alive certain economies. In the age of cultural diversity, any country can allow the world to become familiar with their roots, traditions or beliefs. Much alike the case of natural resources, tourism is regarded mainly from one perspective, that of financial income for the hosts. In a time when technological development marks every corner of the world, the wide-spread touristic activities are enclosing the natural habitat until it reaches the confines of a windowed room, for the leisure of innumerable individuals.

            Tourism determines the need to expand over natural environment. In the field of tourism, the most important aspect is to have impeccable services, which means that enough accommodation must be provided, as well as infrastructure for access to the area as well as recreation facilities. All of these are necessary in order to keep a constant income of visitors, while ensuring that a good deal of profit is being made. For instance, accommodation facilities and recreational areas in the case of ski resorts imply massive deforestation, severely altering the trophic chain of the surrounding forest. Furthermore, the extensive paving required by infrastructure access and travel related building such as airports amount up to an alarmingly high portion of the natural habitat. These inherent, compulsory factors brought about by the progress of the tourism industry eventually end up dominating the environment and turning it into a man-made, artificial one.

            The pressure exercised by the tourism industry does not, however, resume itself to limiting and confining nature. Another grave issue is represented through the enormous resource consumption, pollution and waste that result from the millions of visitors. For instance, in the case of Cyprus, in 2009 the government has approved the touristic development of 14 golf courses. Considering the amount of drinkable water that is already scarce in the region, the annual required volume to maintain the golf-courses sums up to more than a third of the population’s need of potable water over a year. What is more, any form of transportation employed by tourism is, unavoidably, air polluting, bringing a massive contribution to the process of global warming by the means of carbon dioxide emissions. All factors considered, being one of the fastest growing industries around the world, tourism poses one of the biggest threats for the environment and for the preservation of natural habitats, causing a tendency in people to put a price-tag on everything that can be considered exotic by someone else.

            On the other hand, there are also advantages determined by touristic development because of the world-wide advertising this industry can bring to a remote area or potential investors. Therefore, tourism is beneficial because it contributes to key-areas such as raising environmental awareness, the protection and preservation of certain ecosystems and endangered species within protected natural parks. For example, in Congo, the coverage provided by tourism has led to investments to protect the mountain gorillas, one of the most endangered great ape species in the world. One other positive example is the Grupo Punta Cana resort, located in the Dominican Republic. In this case, over 10,000 hectares of natural habitat have been set aside for the preservation of biodiversity and 11 fresh-water springs are maintained for the same purpose. The resort truly combines luxury with utility, also having created a biodiversity laboratory run by the Cornell University. These facts serve but to emphasize that with the proper responsibility, care and attention to the nature which protects humanity, the environmental issues can easily be solved by means of sustainable development.            

As it is the case with most rapidly growing industries, exercising control and regulatory standards is close to impossible on a global level. The lack of environmental awareness and education has brought humanity to the paradox of wanting to travel in order to visit and appreciate a unique place on earth, while destroying it. Awareness for the ecosystem in which people live, should be a part of the common consciousness. Ethical principles should be applied to man’s relationship with his habitat, so that the few positive examples are followed, turning a strictly financial business into a life-giving one, both for people and for the Earth.