How far can poorer countries benefit from scientific developments?

For and against points for poorer countries benefit from science

  • Present a broad interpretation of ‘poorer’.
  • Present a broad interpretation of ‘scientific’ to embrace technology/medicine etc.
  • the extent to which difficulties posed by pricing are insurmountable/avoidable, eg, declining prices; increasing affordability of new technologies; pricing of medicines may be slower to decline
  • ways in which companies/countries might not see it in their financial/political interests for poorer countries to profit
  • the problem of the ‘brain drain’ of talented scientists being attracted to richer countries for study, practice and research
  • the main beneficiaries actually are within a country – the state/individuals/particular groups
  • Poor countries may have other urgencies

How far is it possible for societies to provide equal opportunities for all their citizens?

Equal opportunities for all citizens is an unrealistic goal.

  • What do we mean by ‘equal opportunities’ (a reference to gender, ethnicity, class etc.)
  • Economic and social factors at work in particular societies
  • How the provision of equal opportunities might be monitored
  • The obstacle of resistance to equal opportunities when rooted in cultural/religious issues
  • What about physically vs mentally disabled people?
  • Prisoners?

Can education solve all problems?

While education empowers individuals and provides them with access to more opportunities, education cannot stand alone or solve all problems. We are now living in a world that is vulnerable, uncertain, complex and ambiguous. Unlike the past, the challenges of today prevent education from being the silver bullet that cuts through all problems.

Supporters of the prowess of education will opine that education can catalyse positive social change through enlightening and empowering individuals. Through formal education, individuals gain a better understanding of the world around them and their place in the world. Besides enlightening individuals,  education can empower one to improve one’s community or to surmount one’s unique challenges. For instance, with respect to gender inequality, studies have revealed that women in developing countries who have been educated are unlikely to marry early or undergo harmful cultural practices such as female genital mutilation. Educated women are better able to understand healthcare, family planning and see the merit of education for their own children. It is evident in this small example that education is one of the most effective ways to help individuals adopt new mindsets and perspectives.

In addition, education levels the playing field of the disadvantaged by providing them access to opportunities to improve their standard of living and overcome the problems their communities might face. It does so by equipping people with the necessary knowledge and skills which are needed to seek employment. Notwithstanding the fact that education has been effective in solving problems like women’s rights and poverty, education should not be seen as a panacea to all problems. There are still many obstacles and aggravating factors which might limit the effectiveness of education. Education can only begin to tackle a problem if education is possible in the first place, for instance. The poor and impoverished cannot afford tuition fees, much less other learning tools and resources. The problem of education still persists in remote areas of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Central Asian republics. While it is easy to pour millions into education to change mindsets and empower people, the lack of quality teachers, educational materials and infrastructure will continue to trap large swaths of people living in developing countries.

In addition, there are certain problems which education would be unable to resolve alone. Climate change is one such factor. While education can highlight the issues concerning climate change, the runaway pollution cannot be stopped by education alone. Political will and economic leadership would be more effective in mitigating climate change. Some of the problems which form a whirlwind of socioeconomic issues require a multidimensional and a multi-pronged approach. Education can only be one avenue to solve the issue.

Most significantly education has its own inherent limitations, which may render it ineffective and even counterproductive in solving social problems. On the surface, it may seem that education is a social leveller that empowers individuals and improves lives. This, however, does not seem to hold true in increasingly stratified developed countries, where the presence of generational wealth is a critical determinant of academic success. The wealthy are able to send their children to better schools and avail themselves to better resources. Those in better schools network with people of the same social background. Given that the education system ultimately feeds into the job market, the differences in access to educational opportunities from young inevitably result in severely hampered social mobility.

In short, while education can act as a catalyst to solve problems like poverty and discrimination, education is not the panacea to all the problems of the modern world because of the fact that there are people who cannot afford education. In addition, there are multi-dimensional and multi-faceted challenges that prevent education from being the magic lamp that solves all problems.

To what extent do law and punishment work in the interests of everyone?

  • the law applies to all regardless of background
  • courts have a variety of punishments available to them depending on the particular factors of each individual case
  • many are uncertain that punishment works
  • prisoners and prisons are divided into categories to protect society and those being punished
  • freedoms cannot be guaranteed, despite the law
  • government and government institutions sometimes operate beyond the law and degrade and torture those whom they believe to be a threat
  • the law is enforced by people and they can be fallible, prejudiced and dishonest
  • income can determine the outcome of a trial with better legal advice available for the more wealthy.

How far do you agree that we must have rules and regulations in order to maintain a civilised society?

  • rules are necessary for social and political control
  • rules are in place to control experimenters because of previous failures to recognise subjects’ rights
  • rules and regulations are needed to protect the vulnerable
  • history shows us that exploitation and abuse occur when rules and regulations are not in place
  • we need rules and regulations so that companies do not ignore the well-being of others in the pursuit of profits
  • when rules and regulations are not in place, TNCs are free to adopt different standards from when operating within defined boundaries
  • rules and regulations allow transgressions to be clearly identified and penalties to be imposed.

How successful has your society been in embracing the old?

It is a common misconception that the elderly are marginalised in society and are passed over in favour of younger workers. Critics also opine that the elderly receive limited healthcare, and have their needs neglected. Fortunately, the far-sighted government of Singapore has taken steps to accommodate and appreciate the value of the aged in many ways.  From enhancing the employability skills of the elderly to investing in healthcare and even integrating them into society by altering the living environment, much has been done to embrace the old.

Faced with the reality of an ageing population and shrinking workforce, the Singapore government has given much attention to the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practices (TAFEP). TAFEP curtails workplace discrimination against the elderly and gives those above 55 an equal chance to progress at work.  To assist older workers in staying relevant, government-sponsored skills-training programmes  encourage employers to hire and invest in training older workers. These initiatives point to the fact that the Singapore government has taken the welfare and interests of the elderly into consideration and protected their position in the workforce. Success, in this case, is the foresight with which the government has implemented these initiatives.

Employability aside, the Singapore government has upgraded physical infrastructure and subsidised medical consultations and treatments for the elderly. The Pioneer Generation Package was implemented in 2014 to help senior citizens to cope with rising health expenses in their old age. New hospitals have been built in older public housing estates to cater to geriatric care. The public authority in charge of road infrastructure and transport has installed new road safety features at selected locations with a higher proportion of elderly residents. Measures have been implemented in several housing estates to slow down motorised traffic and enable motorists to keep a better look-out for pedestrians. Singapore has done much to embrace the old, not only in the workplace but also in terms of healthcare and living conditions.

To suggest that everything is perfect in Singapore would be rather dystopian. There are dark corners in even the most brightly lit room. There are a few instances where the elderly have felt outcast and left behind as the rest continue to move forward. There was opposition against the construction of nursing homes in some public housing estates some years back. Residents were afraid of falling property prices with a nursing home in their midst. Isolated instances of young people being rude to the elderly on trains have been documented via social media. Fortunately, such cases are mostly isolated. Singaporeans are largely mindful of the place of the elderly and give the elderly a wide berth in how they adjust to life. The government provides subsidies to young couples to purchase flats near the home of their parents to ensure strong familial links. Even private developers build housing with dual keys to ensure parents can live next to their married children and eventually look after grandchildren.

Singapore has made great leaps in embracing the old. They are kept active in the workforce, infrastructure is adjusted to help them be mobile and healthcare coverage has been expanded to ensure suitable coverage. Singapore has welcomed the old with open arms. They are an asset to the country and the elderly deserve to be well-taken care of rather than being marginalised. There will always be gaps, especially in some members of the public’s mindsets. On the whole, however, Singapore has indeed created a society largely embracing the old.

How far would you agree that the Internet is helping to improve the health and well-being of society?

Keywords: ‘How far’ and ‘agree’ and ‘Internet’ and ‘improve’ and ‘health and well-being’.

  • Access to health information from around the world
  • Minor ailments can be self-diagnosed. People are well informed.
  • Encourages more self-awareness
  • People can share common health problems via social media
  • One can join specific groups, especially local support groups
  • Easy to download and print off medical information
  • Plenty of health instructions and videos posted online
  • Can encourage hypochondria and even misdiagnosis
  • Anything can be put on the Internet – selling of suspect medicines, blotched surgery and misinformation
  • People could perceive doctor or hospital visits as unnecessary
  • False information and conflicting information about exercise routines, diet and superfoods

How difficult is it to feel optimistic, rather than pessimistic, about the future?

The future can be seen in optimistic ways, thanks to science and technology, or in pessimistic ways due to environmental changes.

  • Media tends to focus on negative events. Wide coverage of bad news all the time.
  • Media always shows that there is conflict somewhere in the world
  • Confidence in a country’s political stability and order is often brought to question
  • Future prospects for young people such as education and jobs is questionable
  • Negativity can result in depression and low self-esteem
  • Greater opportunities to change lifestyle exist when one migrates but there is no guarantee.
  • Future depends on personal circumstances and ambitions rather than wider issues