Social Issues Archives

The only way to deal with a criminal is to remove him from society. Discuss.

While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

I. Introduction

Hook: Crime remains a significant challenge for societies worldwide.
Background: Overview of traditional and alternative approaches to dealing with criminals.
Thesis Statement: While removing criminals from society can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer alternative solutions that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.

II. Supporting View 1: Public Safety

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals ensures public safety by preventing further harm.
Example 1: In 2020, the UK increased sentences for serious offenders to protect citizens.
Example 2: In 2019, Italy’s anti-mafia operations removed dangerous criminals from society.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia implemented strict measures to detain violent offenders.
Analysis: These examples demonstrate how removing criminals enhances public safety.

III. Supporting View 2: Deterrence

Topic Sentence: Harsh penalties serve as a deterrent to potential criminals.
Example 1: In 2018, Singapore’s strict drug laws deterred drug trafficking.
Example 2: In 2019, Saudi Arabia’s severe penalties for theft reduced crime rates.
Example 3: In 2020, Japan’s tough stance on organised crime deterred criminal activities.
Analysis: These instances show that strict penalties can deter criminal behaviour.

IV. Supporting View 3: Retribution

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals serves as retribution, providing justice for victims.
Example 1: In 2019, India imposed death penalties for heinous crimes, providing closure to victims’ families.
Example 2: In 2020, South Africa’s long prison sentences for violent crimes satisfied public demand for justice.
Example 3: In 2021, France’s life sentences for terrorists offered retribution to affected communities.
Analysis: These examples illustrate how removing criminals satisfies the need for justice and retribution.

V. Opposing View 1: Rehabilitation

Topic Sentence: Rehabilitation offers a chance for criminals to reform and reintegrate.
Example 1: In 2020, Norway’s rehabilitation programmes significantly reduced reoffending rates.
Example 2: In 2019, Sweden’s focus on rehabilitation over punishment led to successful reintegration of offenders.
Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s humane prison system prioritised rehabilitation, showing positive outcomes.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate the effectiveness of rehabilitation in reducing reoffending and promoting reintegration.

VI. Opposing View 2: Restorative Justice

Topic Sentence: Restorative justice addresses the harm caused and promotes healing.
Example 1: In 2018, New Zealand’s restorative justice practices helped victims and offenders reconcile.
Example 2: In 2019, South Africa’s community justice programmes resolved conflicts and healed communities.
Example 3: In 2020, Canada’s restorative justice initiatives reduced recidivism and repaired harm.
Analysis: These instances show how restorative justice can effectively address crime’s impact and promote healing.

VII. Opposing View 3: Social and Economic Costs

Topic Sentence: Removing criminals from society incurs high social and economic costs.
Example 1: In 2020, the UK faced criticism for the high costs of long-term imprisonment.
Example 2: In 2019, Italy struggled with overcrowded prisons and the associated costs.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia debated the financial burden of extensive incarceration policies.
Analysis: These examples highlight the significant social and economic costs of removing criminals from society.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While removing criminals can protect the public and deter crime, rehabilitation and restorative justice offer viable alternatives that address underlying issues and promote reintegration.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: A balanced approach combining removal, rehabilitation, and restorative justice can effectively address crime and promote societal well-being.

The main benefits of science have been material comforts and longer life. Do you agree?

While science has undeniably provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.

I. Introduction

Hook: Science has revolutionised our lives in many ways.
Background: Overview of the impacts of scientific advancements on society.
Thesis Statement: While science has undeniably provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.

II. Supporting View 1: Material Comforts

Topic Sentence: Science has greatly improved material comforts.
Example 1: In 2021, Japan’s advancements in robotics improved household convenience.
Example 2: In 2019, Germany’s renewable energy innovations led to sustainable living.
Example 3: In 2020, South Korea’s smart home technology enhanced everyday comfort.
Analysis: These examples show how scientific advancements have provided significant material comforts.

III. Supporting View 2: Longer Life

Topic Sentence: Science has extended human lifespan.
Example 1: In 2021, the UK’s COVID-19 vaccines saved countless lives.
Example 2: In 2020, Japan’s advancements in geriatric care improved elderly health.
Example 3: In 2019, Singapore’s healthcare innovations increased life expectancy.
Analysis: These instances illustrate how scientific progress has contributed to longer, healthier lives.

IV. Supporting View 3: Improved Quality of Life

Topic Sentence: Science has improved the overall quality of life.
Example 1: In 2020, Sweden’s advancements in clean air technology improved public health.
Example 2: In 2019, Norway’s electric vehicle adoption reduced pollution.
Example 3: In 2018, Switzerland’s medical research advancements provided better disease management.
Analysis: These examples highlight how science has enhanced life quality through health and environmental improvements.

V. Opposing View 1: Environmental Preservation

Topic Sentence: Science has provided material comforts but more significantly science also has contributed to environmental preservation.
Example 1: In 2021, Costa Rica’s use of renewable energy promoted sustainability.
Example 2: In 2019, Kenya’s conservation technology protected wildlife.
Example 3: In 2020, the Netherlands’ water management technology prevented flooding.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate science’s role in protecting and preserving the environment.

VI. Opposing View 2: Global Communication

Topic Sentence: Besides providing material comforts, science has transformed global communication.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s satellite technology improved rural connectivity.
Example 2: In 2019, South Korea’s 5G network revolutionised communication.
Example 3: In 2021, Finland’s internet technology enabled remote working.
Analysis: These examples show how scientific advancements have facilitated better global communication and connectivity.

VII. Opposing View 3: Enhanced Knowledge

Topic Sentence: Science has significantly enhanced human knowledge. This overshadows the aspect of science has provided material comforts.
Example 1: In 2021, CERN’s research in Switzerland advanced our understanding of physics.
Example 2: In 2019, Japan’s space missions provided new insights into the universe.
Example 3: In 2020, China’s AI research pushed the boundaries of technology.
Analysis: These instances illustrate science’s role in expanding our knowledge and understanding of the world.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While science has provided material comforts and longer life, its main benefits extend to environmental preservation, global communication, and enhanced knowledge.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: The true value of science lies in its broad and transformative impact on all aspects of life.

The problems of poverty can only get worse in the current climate. Discuss.

There is no doubt that climate change exacerbates poverty. While current economic and environmental challenges exacerbate poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope for alleviating it.

I. Introduction

Hook: Climate change is catastrophic for the poor. Poverty remains a pressing global issue.
Background: Overview of current economic and environmental challenges.
Thesis Statement: While current economic and environmental challenges exacerbate poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope for alleviating it.

II. Supporting View 1: Economic Inequality

Topic Sentence: Rising economic inequality worsens poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s wealth gap widened, increasing poverty.
Example 2: In 2019, South Africa faced growing economic disparity and poverty.
Example 3: In 2021, Brazil saw increased inequality due to the pandemic.
Analysis: These examples show how economic inequality exacerbates poverty.

III. Supporting View 2: Climate Change

Topic Sentence: Climate change exacerbates poverty by affecting livelihoods.
Example 1: In 2019, Cyclone Idai devastated Mozambique, increasing poverty.
Example 2: In 2020, Australian bushfires harmed agriculture and local economies.
Example 3: In 2021, floods in Germany displaced thousands, worsening poverty.
Analysis: These cases illustrate how climate disasters worsen poverty conditions.

IV. Supporting View 3: Pandemic Impact

Topic Sentence: The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened poverty globally.
Example 1: In 2020, Kenya’s economy suffered, increasing poverty levels.
Example 2: In 2021, Peru faced economic collapse, worsening poverty.
Example 3: In 2020, India’s lockdowns severely impacted the poor.
Analysis: These examples show the pandemic’s significant impact on poverty.

V. Opposing View 1: Innovative Policies

Topic Sentence: Innovative policies can help alleviate poverty.
Example 1: In 2019, Finland’s basic income experiment reduced poverty.
Example 2: In 2021, South Korea’s universal welfare policies helped the poor.
Example 3: In 2020, Germany’s social safety nets supported many during the pandemic.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how innovative policies can reduce poverty.

VI. Opposing View 2: Technological Advancements

Topic Sentence: Technology offers new solutions to combat poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, India’s digital payments increased financial inclusion.
Example 2: In 2019, Kenya’s M-Pesa revolutionised banking for the poor.
Example 3: In 2021, Rwanda’s drone deliveries improved healthcare access.
Analysis: These examples highlight how technology can alleviate poverty.

VII. Opposing View 3: Global Cooperation

Topic Sentence: International cooperation can address global poverty.
Example 1: In 2020, the EU’s recovery fund supported member states in crisis.
Example 2: In 2019, China’s Belt and Road Initiative invested in developing nations.
Example 3: In 2021, the UN’s SDGs targeted global poverty reduction.
Analysis: These instances show the potential of global cooperation to reduce poverty.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While current challenges worsen poverty, innovative policies, technology, and global cooperation offer hope.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Collective efforts and innovation are essential to combat poverty effectively.

A good leader must be a good follower. Is this necessarily true?

A good leader often benefits from being a good follower, gaining essential skills and insights. However, leadership also requires independent thinking and decisive action, which do not always align with the premise of the question.

I. Introduction

Hook: Leadership and followership are often seen as opposing roles.
Background: Brief overview of leadership qualities and the importance of followership.
Thesis Statement: A good leader often benefits from being a good follower, gaining essential skills and insights. However, leadership also requires independent thinking and decisive action, which do not always align with following.

II. Supporting View 1: Understanding Team Dynamics

Topic Sentence: Good followers understand team dynamics, which is crucial for effective leadership.
Example 1: In 2020, Jacinda Ardern’s collaborative approach in New Zealand showed strong team dynamics.
Example 2: In 2018, Emmanuel Macron’s rise involved understanding and working within different political groups in France.
Example 3: In 2021, Sanna Marin’s leadership in Finland highlighted her ability to engage with her team.
Analysis: These examples show that understanding team dynamics enhances leadership effectiveness.

III. Supporting View 2: Empathy and Support

Topic Sentence: Good followers develop empathy and the ability to support others, crucial for leaders.
Example 1: In 2017, Angela Merkel’s empathetic response to the refugee crisis showed her understanding of people’s needs in Germany.
Example 2: In 2019, Justin Trudeau’s supportive policies in Canada demonstrated empathy.
Example 3: In 2018, Leo Varadkar’s leadership in Ireland reflected his supportive approach to social issues.
Analysis: These cases illustrate how empathy and support are vital leadership qualities developed through good followership.

IV. Supporting View 3: Learning from Leaders

Topic Sentence: Good followers learn from their leaders, which is essential for their own leadership development.
Example 1: In 2018, Theresa May’s experience under David Cameron in the UK shaped her leadership.
Example 2: In 2019, Japan’s Shinzo Abe benefited from his early political roles.
Example 3: In 2020, Pedro Sánchez of Spain grew through his political experiences.
Analysis: These examples highlight how learning from leaders can prepare individuals for their own leadership roles.

V. Opposing View 1: Independent Thinking

Topic Sentence: Leadership requires independent thinking, which does not always align with being a follower.
Example 1: In 2019, Narendra Modi’s decisive actions in India showed independent leadership.
Example 2: In 2018, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman demonstrated independent, sometimes controversial, decisions.
Example 3: In 2020, Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky showed strong independent leadership in crisis.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate how independent thinking is crucial for effective leadership.

VI. Opposing View 2: Decisiveness and Authority

Topic Sentence: Leaders need to make decisive and authoritative decisions, which followers may not always do.
Example 1: In 2021, Boris Johnson’s handling of the UK’s COVID-19 response required decisive leadership.
Example 2: In 2020, South Korea’s Moon Jae-in took decisive actions against COVID-19.
Example 3: In 2019, Ethiopia’s Abiy Ahmed’s peace efforts required authoritative decisions.
Analysis: These instances show that decisiveness and authority are essential for leadership, sometimes contrasting with followership.

VII. Opposing View 3: Vision and Innovation

Topic Sentence: Effective leaders often have a vision and drive innovation, which followers may lack.
Example 1: In 2020, Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen showed innovative leadership in technology and health.
Example 2: In 2018, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame led with a vision for technological advancement.
Analysis: These examples illustrate that having a vision and driving innovation are key leadership traits.

VIII. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While being a good follower can enhance leadership skills, effective leadership also requires independent thinking, decisiveness, and vision.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: A balanced approach that integrates followership experiences with independent leadership traits is ideal.

This essay is overly focused on politicians and may not score well, although it has many examples. It is important to provide a broad perspective of where leaders are needed. Leaders can be found in schools, the military, prisons, and any place where hierarchies are required, i.e., even at home.

Affluence is as much a curse as a blessing. Discuss.

I. Introduction

Hook: Wealth is often seen as the key to happiness.
Background: Overview of the advantages and disadvantages of affluence.
Thesis Statement: Affluence brings comfort and opportunities but also leads to social isolation and environmental harm, making it both a curse and a blessing.

II. Supporting View 1: Increased Comfort and Opportunities

Topic Sentence: Affluence provides comfort and numerous opportunities.
Example 1: In 2019, Singapore’s high-income citizens enjoyed excellent healthcare and education.
Example 2: In 2021, Qatar’s wealth funded state-of-the-art infrastructure and public services.
Example 3: In 2018, Switzerland’s affluent society benefited from high living standards and security.
Analysis: These examples show how wealth can improve quality of life and provide opportunities.

III. Supporting View 2: Ability to Support Others

Topic Sentence: Affluent individuals and nations can support others in need.
Example 1: In 2020, Norway donated significant funds for global COVID-19 relief.
Example 2: In 2018, the UAE provided extensive humanitarian aid to war-torn Yemen.
Example 3: In 2021, Germany funded various international development projects.
Analysis: These instances highlight how affluence enables support for less fortunate communities.

IV. Opposing View 1: Social Isolation and Mental Health Issues

Topic Sentence: Affluence can lead to social isolation and mental health problems.
Example 1: In 2021, reports from Japan showed high rates of loneliness among wealthy individuals.
Example 2: In 2019, South Korea saw a rise in mental health issues among its affluent youth.
Example 3: In 2018, the UK reported increased depression rates in wealthy areas.
Analysis: These examples illustrate how wealth can lead to social isolation and mental health struggles.

V. Opposing View 2: Environmental Impact

Topic Sentence: Affluence contributes to significant environmental damage.
Example 1: In 2020, China’s rapid industrialisation led to severe air pollution.
Example 2: In 2019, the UAE’s high consumption rates resulted in significant waste production.
Example 3: In 2021, Australia’s affluent lifestyle contributed to large carbon footprints.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how affluent lifestyles can harm the environment.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Affluence brings comfort and opportunities but also leads to social isolation and environmental harm, making it both a curse and a blessing.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balance the pursuit of wealth with awareness of its potential drawbacks.

Is the cost of developing a national identity too high?

The cost of developing a national identity can be high due to potential social and economic conflicts. However, it is essential for unity and cultural preservation.

I. Introduction

Hook: National identity shapes a nation’s character and values.
Background: Overview of the importance and costs of developing national identity.
Thesis Statement: The cost of developing a national identity can be high due to potential social and economic conflicts. However, it is essential for unity and cultural preservation.

II. Supporting View 1: Social Conflict

Topic Sentence: Developing a national identity can lead to social conflict.
Example 1: In 2017, Catalonia’s push for independence caused severe tension in Spain.
Example 2: In 2014, Scotland’s independence referendum divided the UK.
Example 3: In 2019, the Hong Kong protests highlighted identity struggles within China.
Analysis: These examples show how efforts to develop national identity can cause social unrest and division.

III. Supporting View 2: Economic Costs

Topic Sentence: Developing a national identity can incur significant economic costs.
Example 1: In 2016, Brexit led to economic uncertainty in the UK.
Example 2: In 2018, Italy’s nationalist policies strained its economy and EU relations.
Example 3: In 2020, India’s national identity campaigns, like “Make in India,” faced economic challenges.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how national identity efforts can lead to substantial economic costs.

IV. Opposing View 1: Unity and Social Cohesion

Topic Sentence: National identity fosters unity and social cohesion.
Example 1: In 2021, Japan’s Olympics fostered national pride and unity.
Example 2: In 2018, France’s World Cup victory boosted national morale.
Example 3: In 2017, Finland’s centenary celebrations reinforced national unity.
Analysis: These examples illustrate how a strong national identity can bring people together and foster a sense of belonging.

V. Opposing View 2: Cultural Preservation

Topic Sentence: Developing a national identity helps preserve cultural heritage.
Example 1: In 2021, South Korea promoted its cultural heritage through K-pop and K-dramas.
Example 2: In 2016, India celebrated its cultural diversity through various national initiatives.
Example 3: In 2020, Ireland’s cultural festivals reinforced its unique identity.
Analysis: These instances highlight how national identity efforts help preserve and promote cultural heritage.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While developing a national identity can be costly due to social and economic conflicts, it is essential for unity and cultural preservation.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balance efforts to foster national identity with strategies to mitigate social and economic costs.

Examine the claim that patriotism is of little value in modern times.

While some argue that patriotism has diminished in value due to globalisation and modern challenges, others believe it remains essential for national unity and identity.

I. Introduction

Hook: Patriotism is often debated in today’s globalised world.
Background: Overview of patriotism’s role historically and in contemporary society.
Thesis Statement: While some argue that patriotism has diminished in value due to globalisation and modern challenges, others believe it remains essential for national unity and identity.

II. Supporting View 1: Globalisation Reduces Patriotism

Topic Sentence: Globalisation diminishes the value of patriotism.
Example 1: In 2016, the Brexit debate highlighted how globalisation challenges national loyalty in the UK.
Example 2: In 2020, protests in Hong Kong emphasised a struggle between local identity and global influences.
Example 3: In 2018, the Catalonia independence movement showed the conflict between regionalism and national loyalty in Spain.
Analysis: These examples show how globalisation and regional identities challenge traditional patriotism.

III. Supporting View 2: Modern Challenges Outweigh Patriotism

Topic Sentence: Modern challenges make patriotism seem less relevant.
Example 1: In 2021, climate change protests in Germany prioritised global environmental issues over national pride.
Example 2: In 2019, the refugee crisis in Europe raised questions about national borders versus humanitarian concerns.
Example 3: In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic required global cooperation, reducing focus on national interests.
Analysis: These instances illustrate how pressing global issues can overshadow patriotic sentiments.

IV. Opposing View 1: Patriotism Promotes National Unity

Topic Sentence: Patriotism fosters national unity and social cohesion.
Example 1: In 2021, the UK’s response to COVID-19 saw a surge in national unity and support for the NHS.
Example 2: In 2018, the French rallied together during the World Cup, boosting national pride and unity.
Example 3: In 2020, Japan’s Olympics preparations highlighted patriotism and collective effort.
Analysis: These examples show how patriotism can bring people together, fostering unity and pride.

V. Opposing View 2: Patriotism Maintains National Identity

Topic Sentence: Patriotism helps maintain and celebrate national identity.
Example 1: In 2017, India’s celebration of Independence Day highlighted its cultural heritage and unity.
Example 2: In 2020, Russia’s Victory Day parade reinforced national pride and historical remembrance.
Example 3: In 2019, Australia Day celebrated national achievements and identity despite controversies.
Analysis: These instances demonstrate how patriotism sustains national identity and cultural values.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While globalisation and modern challenges may reduce patriotism’s perceived value, it remains crucial for national unity and identity.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Balance global cooperation with national pride to navigate modern complexities.

Is there a justifiable need for wildlife?

Wildlife is essential for ecological balance, scientific research, and cultural value. However, some argue it conflicts with human needs and development.

I. Introduction

Hook: Wildlife is a crucial part of Earth’s biodiversity.
Background: Brief overview of the roles wildlife plays in nature and society.
Thesis Statement: Wildlife is essential for ecological balance, scientific research, and cultural value. However, some argue it conflicts with human needs and development.

II. Supporting View 1: Ecological Balance

Topic Sentence: Wildlife maintains ecological balance and supports ecosystems.
Example 1: In Kenya, elephants help shape the landscape and promote biodiversity.
Example 2: In India, tigers control herbivore populations, preserving forest health.
Example 3: In Australia, bees pollinate crops, vital for food production.
Analysis: These examples show how wildlife is crucial for maintaining healthy ecosystems.

III. Supporting View 2: Scientific Research

Topic Sentence: Wildlife is invaluable for scientific research and medical advancements.
Example 1: In Costa Rica, studying frogs leads to medical breakthroughs.
Example 2: In Madagascar, lemurs provide insights into evolutionary biology.
Example 3: In Tanzania, chimpanzee research aids understanding of human behaviour.
Analysis: These cases illustrate the importance of wildlife for scientific progress and health benefits.

IV. Opposing View 1: Conflict with Human Needs

Topic Sentence: Wildlife sometimes conflicts with human needs and safety.
Example 1: In India, human-tiger conflicts result in fatalities and livestock loss.
Example 2: In South Africa, elephants damage crops, impacting farmers’ livelihoods.
Example 3: In Australia, sharks pose a risk to swimmers and surfers.
Analysis: These examples highlight the challenges of coexisting with wildlife.

V. Opposing View 2: Hindrance to Development

Topic Sentence: Wildlife conservation can hinder economic development and infrastructure projects.
Example 1: In Brazil, protecting the Amazon rainforest limits agricultural expansion.
Example 2: In China, preserving pandas restricts urban development in certain areas.
Example 3: In Kenya, wildlife reserves sometimes limit land available for housing.
Analysis: These instances show how wildlife conservation can conflict with development goals.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: Wildlife is essential for ecological balance, scientific research, and cultural value, but it can conflict with human needs and development.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Strive for a balanced approach that values both wildlife conservation and human progress.

History has shown us that crime never pays. Do you agree?

While history often demonstrates that crime does not pay in the long run, there are instances where criminals have benefited from their actions, suggesting a more complex reality.

I. Introduction

Hook: The saying “crime never pays” is widely believed.
Background: Brief overview of historical examples of crime and their outcomes.
Thesis Statement: While history often demonstrates that crime does not pay in the long run, there are instances where criminals have benefited from their actions, suggesting a more complex reality.

II. Supporting View 1: Punishment and Justice

Topic Sentence: Historical examples show that criminals often face severe punishment.
Example 1: In 1989, Nicolae Ceaușescu, the Romanian dictator, was executed after his regime’s crimes were exposed.
Example 2: In 2013, Italian Mafia boss Domenico Raccuglia was arrested and sentenced to life in prison.
Example 3: In 2009, Bernard Madoff, though American, faced global repercussions for his Ponzi scheme, showing the reach of justice.
Analysis: These examples illustrate that crime often leads to punishment and downfall.

III. Supporting View 2: Loss of Reputation and Power

Topic Sentence: Criminals often lose their reputation and power, showing that crime does not pay.
Example 1: In 2011, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak was imprisoned for corruption and abuse of power.
Example 2: In 1992, former East German leader Erich Honecker was prosecuted for human rights abuses.
Example 3: In 2018, former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak faced charges for the 1MDB scandal.
Analysis: These cases demonstrate that crime often results in the loss of power and respect.

IV. Opposing View 1: Short-Term Gains

Topic Sentence: Some criminals benefit from their actions in the short term.
Example 1: In 1994, Russian oligarchs amassed wealth during the chaotic privatisation period.
Example 2: In the 1980s, Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar built an empire and gained immense power before his downfall.
Example 3: In 2007, British art thief Leonardo Notarbartolo managed a massive diamond heist in Belgium.
Analysis: These examples show that crime can lead to significant short-term gains.

V. Opposing View 2: Criminal Success Stories

Topic Sentence: Some criminals avoid punishment and retain their gains.
Example 1: In 1980, former Ugandan dictator Idi Amin lived in exile in Saudi Arabia without facing justice.
Example 2: In 2001, former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori fled to Japan and avoided immediate prosecution.
Example 3: In 2010, Indian businessman Lalit Modi fled to the UK to avoid corruption charges and maintained a comfortable life.
Analysis: These instances suggest that some criminals escape justice and enjoy their gains.

VI. Conclusion

Restate Thesis: While history often shows that crime does not pay, there are exceptions where criminals benefit.
Summary of Key Points: Recap the main supporting and opposing views.
Final Thought: Crime’s consequences are complex, highlighting the need for a nuanced understanding of justice.