“Studying overseas is an over-rated experience.” What is your opinion?

Heading abroad for education is a stimulating prospect for the mass. There are inadequate vacancies for competent students in their local varsities so numerous bourgeois class or high-income families have sent their progenies overseas to learn. Students armed with the prerequisites and budgetary means, by and large, will seek a foreign studying experience for all-embracing maturity. In due course, prestige became affiliated with overseas education. However, the experience is perchance over-rated since it in all likelihood will bring about several disadvantages due to the predicaments a student inescapably face residing and studying in a diverse culture. Evaluating the pros against the cons, studying overseas is not utterly an over-rated experience although it is also specious to perceive it as entirely beneficial.

            The core merits of studying abroad are academic ones. Overseas education proposes scores of specialized institutions for international students to major in specific courses given that education in certain fields is of a superior standard in some other states. These colleges commonly profit from cutting edge teaching facilities and supplementary resources. Moreover, their mentors have senior professional standards, and they thoroughly comprehend the latest developments in their academic spheres. For instance, “The Times” listed Harvard University and University of Cambridge among the globe’s five leading colleges in its Higher – QS World University Rankings 2008. The former and latter were, in that order, first and second in the league table of top universities. Harvard lays claim to pre-eminent life sciences and biomedicine faculty, as well as 3561 international students in 2009. Due to the high academic calibre, the degrees attained by international students are typically credible wherever worldwide. Hence, learning abroad does not assess to be an exceedingly over-praised experience.

            Nevertheless, foreign education is funded by affluence so only the scarce minority can meet the expenses of it. Students who lead parsimonious routines may neglect their academics since they may have to support themselves by labouring part-time. In addition to plausible challenges of adapting to a dissimilar society, the students may become homesick therefore vulnerable to adverse influences from peers. This can be overcome with the extensively available technologies in the modern world such as Skype and video conferences. As a result, frequent communication with their families would alleviate lonesomeness, thwarting consequential detrimental repercussions. Generally, such drawbacks are repeatedly trivialized, thus studying overseas aggregates to an over-rated experience.

            Furthermore, when large numbers of native students decide on studying overseas, it may lead to a higher rate of emigration. This culminates in a “brain drain” effect and a country would fail to hold fast onto worthwhile human capital which is crucial to all economies. Although the above chain of events could be vastly valid, there are countless students who have notable accomplishments in foreign institutions and returned to serve their motherland. The intellectual skills and cross-cultural familiarity of homecoming students are instrumental to local economic development. Therefore, the worth of a foreign education experience is not exaggerated.

Besides significant academic advantages, students benefit massively from cross-cultural exposure. They are in a surpassing position to improve their foreign languages since they are immersed in external cultures which demand perpetual application of foreign languages. Furthermore, studying abroad fast-tracks novel stances as well as composes more perspectives to issues in multifarious frames of mind. Students become more comfortable coming to grips with labyrinthine plights and nurture the capacity to muddle through ambiguous details hence developing amenability. Overseas students mainly attend western schools which tend to yield more holistic students as the students are expected to express and verbalize, and form independent brainwork. Thus studying overseas is an enriching and prime experience.

Overseas education is more often than not a high-priced activity and its merits are usually non-quantifiable in the monetary sense, apart from career opportunities and remuneration. Since there is no elementary system to juxtapose tangible costs against impalpable benefits in the long run, studying overseas is not an over-rated experience on the condition that the students intensely hanker after it. I consider that the bulk of students would appreciate and reap boon from an overseas education supposing their financial statuses entitle.

Evaluate the possible advantages of apprenticeships and training in the work place over school and college courses.

Possible Points for advantages of apprenticeships and training in the workplace

Hands-on experience useful when applying for a job
• Some young people prefer using practical skills
• May have a small wage
• Useful for businesses
• Academics are important to deliver leadership in education and health
• Also can have a combination of both, e.g. hospitals and schools

“Literature is useless in a pragmatic world.” Do you agree with this view?

In many societies, today literature is considered useless as it provides with no economic benefits. In pragmatist societies, people are concerned with economic growth and progress at an individual and national level. In such society’s importance is given more to practical subjects like mathematics and science which are key to getting high paying jobs. For example, by studying mathematics and science people can breakthrough in fields such as engineering, data analytics and medicine. Literature, on the other hand, does not provide any such economic benefits. It is believed that the one who studies literature would end up struggling or becoming a writer which is a high-risk job. Such a mindset towards literature is the primary reason why literature is considered useless in a pragmatic world. After all, we need more computer engineers, accountants and software developers in this competitive world. Studying literature does not contribute to any of these essential skills and thus is useless in a pragmatic world.

In our practical world today, more emphasis is being placed on subjects like Science and mathematics. Pragmatists believe that for building a strong economy people should be adept at these subjects. This stems from the fact that subjects like science and mathematics are required and given more preference even in the job market. When it comes to Literature, pragmatists believe that it is a pointless subject that does not offer any insights into the real world. For them, knowledge of scientific theories and geometric theorems is more important than the knowledge of Shakespeare’s plays and Auden’s war poetry. However, disagreeing with this view it can be contended that literature is still relevant and useful in a pragmatic world because it holds historical value, provides us with a wealth of knowledge and helps engage with diverse cultural perspectives.

However, terming literature as useless based on the economic benefits is reductive. The usefulness of literature does not rely on whether it provides people with high-paying jobs or successful careers. Literature is useful because it provides people with an opportunity to look at things from broader perspectives. It provides people with an infinite source of knowledge which is instrumental in enriching the lifestyles and mindset of the people living within the society.

Literature provides insights into the human mind and allows people to empathize with various situations. The study of literature allows people to understand other people’s feelings which helps people to connect to various aspects of different regions, races, societies, and periods of time. Literary works provide a variety of genres and themes that are applicable to daily lives. For example, To Kill a Mocking bird gives readers insights into issues like race and justice from the perspective of a child. The book leads readers to empathise with the characters and teaches them a lesson of morality.  Similarly, works of Shakespeare are instrumental in understanding human nature. His plays like Macbeth and Hamlet provide valuable insights into the psyche of the characters. Literature is helpful in providing a broad view of society, through the eyes of the characters. Literature in this sense is not useless as it fosters understanding, tolerance and empathy values that are important in today’s pragmatic world.

Literature is also important as it allows us to understand the nuances of language. In the technological world where people use contractions and chat language to communicate it is essential to understand the language. Literature leads to enrichment of the language, people by reading and analysing works of literature can learn about syntax, vocabulary and writing styles. Classical works of George Orwell, William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens can help people understand the evolution of language. Literary structures, trends, the way views are expressed within these works bring awareness about language developments and can lead to a better understanding of language in the current context. These language skills that are built by the study of literature can help people to become confident and use language in academic as well as social settings. For example, use of language can help them in writing academic essays and while stepping in the job world it can help them write convincing cover letters and drafting emails. Thus, literature has practical use in society and to deem it as useless is because of the deeply entrenched misconceptions about its utility. Thus, the study of literature is useful in the pragmatic world because it has practical uses.

Lastly, literature has an entertaining value that can help readers escape from the shackles of their mundane lives. In a pragmatic world, people are in a constant rat race to outdo each other, such struggle leads to stress that is inevitable. Reading works of literature can provide people with the necessary respite from their stressful lives. By reading literature we can dive into different realms and let our imagination run free. For example, by reading JK Rowling’s Harry Potter, people can be a part of that universe and imagine themselves to be using wands and invisibility cloaks. Similarly, by reading Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, people can imagine themselves rafting through the Mississippi River with Huck and Jim. Such escapism helps people in forgetting about the stress in their lives even if for a moment. Thus, in this pragmatic world where stress is inevitable, literature provides the much-needed entertainment and escapism and hence cannot be deemed as useless.

In conclusion, literature is useful in this pragmatic world. While economic growth and progress are important, it cannot be denied that literature holds an intrinsic value today. Literature provides the necessary knowledge, entertainment, fosters creativity and offers an escape for readers. In this way, literature is not useless but is essential for enriching our lives in more ways than one.

‘Religious education should be a part of the school curriculum.’ Discuss.

Points for/against religious education should be a part of the school curriculum

Religion should be taught in the home, not at school
• Some countries go by the principle of separation of church and state
• Religious education can lead to segregation and stereotyping
• Not all families are religious
• Time could be spent on other subjects
• Does not always meet the needs of a multicultural society
• Children could be taught in ways that disturb their own legitimate beliefs
• Some parents send their children to “faith schools” in spite of not being religious themselves.
These schools sometimes have the reputation of being well-disciplined and promoting high
achievement
• It can increase divisions in a community and a nation
• Perhaps the teaching of ethics and morals, as an alternative
• The local place of worship can provide education, out of school hours
Knowledge of different religions can develop a greater understanding of others

“The classroom is the only place for education”. Discuss.

Points for and against the claim that the classroom is the only place for education.

The classroom environment is desirable both economically and socially
• The classroom is the only place for education because it can encourage co-operative learning
• Specialist knowledge can be made available to many
• Expensive technology can be shared
• Offers an environment that values and encourages education
• Provides a space that promotes respect for diversity
• Homeschooling can have positive and negative effects
• Distance learning can benefit the individual learner
• Parents are the key educators
• The classroom limits freedom and exploration
• It can be a diminishing experience for some
• Teaching and learning knows no boundaries

Essay Questions on Education

GP Essay Questions on Education. Have a look at these GP Essay Questions on Education from the past papers.

  1. Do you think that there is any need for change in the educational system in your country?
  2. ‘The main function of education should be to enable people to gain employment.’ How far do you agree?
  3. ‘Education does not develop individuality but conformity.’ Is such a statement always valid?
  4. ‘The word failure should never be used in education.’ Do you agree with this view?
  5. ‘Conformity should be the main aim of all schools.’ How far is this true?
  6. ‘Only educated people should have the right to vote for elections.’ What is your view?
  7. Is a sound knowledge of science and technology essential for a well-educated person in today’s world?
  8. Does a study of history make you optimistic or pessimistic about the future of the human race?
  9. Is History anything more than the study of warfare?
  10. Nowadays, the pleasures of reading can never compete with the pleasures of visual entertainment.’ To what extent do you agree?
  11. Discuss the benefits and disadvantages which technological developments are likely to have upon education in the near future.
  12. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of being educated abroad.

‘Earnings should reflect the status and usefulness of jobs.’ Discuss.

Is it true that earnings should reflect the status and usefulness of jobs

• Reflects training and education
• Degree of responsibility
• Earnings have to attract appropriately qualified people
• Earnings as a motivator
• How is ‘useful’ defined?
• Supply and demand (scarce tradesmen can become high status and
can demand high earnings hence more useful)
Diverse vacancies need to be filled and could be considered as of equal
value
• Depends on the traditions, philosophies and regimes of a country
(should a doctor get paid the same as a cleaner as both jobs could be
seen as having equal usefulness)
• High-status jobs (university lecturer) can be relatively low paid as
status/job satisfaction are reward enough
• Where does this place bankers/stockbrokers/bureaucrats?
• Do status and usefulness of jobs go together?

‘I wish I were outdoors and not stuck in a classroom!’ Explain the possible benefits of learning in the open air.

Possible points for/against benefits of learning in the open air

The importance of play in early education
• A break from the traditional curriculum
• Demands of a curriculum may be seen to conflict with freedom
• Various opportunities for inner-city children
Theatre and drama
• Creative writing
• Health and safety concerns
• Improvement in cognitive ability
• Less exposure to traffic and pollutants
• Restorative and good for mental health
• In some countries, teaching traditionally takes place outside because of
climate or lack of buildings