Author: GpAdmin

I live Gp.

To what extent is sport in your country considered as part of its heritage?

Is sport in your country considered as part of its heritage

• Any sport could be mentioned but it must relate to your country
• Relate to competitions, leisure facilities, popularity and media coverage
• Define heritage (tradition, its history/origin, could be football but could
be played for a traditional trophy)
• How unique is the sport?
• There could be no sporting heritage or a lack of interest in sport
• How integrated is it into a country’s culture?
• Perhaps sport is part of a global heritage (world cup) copied by other
countries

Discuss the view that there are times and places in which music should never be played.

view that there are times and places in which music should never be played.

• Personal devices
• Music should never be played in inappropriate contexts
• Some people may find music, or certain music, appropriate in certain
situations whereas others do not
• Time and disturbance
• While eating
• The view may be challenged
• Enforcement
• Sacred places
• Music can be essential
• Musical genres may be discussed, compared, contrasted

‘Believing in evolution demands that one rejects the existence of a creator.’ Discuss.

Consider whether believing in evolution demands the rejection of the existence of a creator.

• The two can be compatible
• Scientists have been proven wrong
• Much depends on our perception of the created and the creator
• Monotheistic teaching and the book
• Logic versus faith
• Science and evolution
• GM and cloning
• Artificial intelligence
• Many prominent physicists believe in a creator God
• Revelation is endless – our exploration of the cosmos

‘Adverts have to be memorable to be successful.’ Examine this claim.

Points for whether adverts have to be memorable to be successful.

• Eye-catching slogans
• Connection with the brand (verbal and visual cues)
• Create a storyline that connects to the audience
• Humour and satire can make adverts memorable
• Not just one-offs but a series which carry theme and character,
connecting to the brand
• Needs imagery which has an immediate impact
• Needs to be simple and clear
• Quality is essential, as part of a marketing strategy
• Depends on the medium (TV, magazine, billboard, internet)
• Jingles/music can be easily recalled to connect to the brand
• New products need as much factual information as possible.
• Celebrity endorsement
• High-end products do not require targeted marketing
• There needs to be an informed discussion with a reasoned conclusion

‘Longer life expectancy creates more problems than benefits.’ Discuss.

Longer life is only good when the elderly have the financial resources to look after themselves. Longer life does indeed create more problems than benefits.

Right up to the late nineteenth century, life expectancy was short, people were considered fortunate enough to live till their fifties. However, advancements in the field of medicine has changed this completely. People have started living longer thanks to vaccines and medical treatments. Though science should be celebrated for coming up with better cures for untreatable diseases, there is no denying that science has also led to problems by stretching the life expectancy of the people. Thus, it can be said that problems of longer life expectancy outweigh the benefits because it has led to deterioration in quality of life, plus has brought various social and economic problems.

Longer life expectancy has allowed people to have multiple career paths. They are not bound to follow a single career path. It can be thus said that longevity has allowed people to contribute much more to society with their skills and talents. Unlike the past, people do not have to regret for not being able to accomplish their plans because of a shorter life span.  Longer life expectancy also allows for greater sharing of traditions and allows grandchildren to have more experience and exchange with their grandparents. Thus, it can be said that longer life expectancy has created many opportunities for people to fulfil their life goals.

However, longer life expectancy has also led to multiple problems like deterioration of quality of life. Though people today have access to medicines for various diseases, it has not helped in improving their quality of life. In fact, most patients suffering from terminal illnesses like heart disease, cancer and Alzheimer’s derive little health improvements. People suffering from these illnesses gradually get worse and this makes people wonder if a long life is even useful.  There are medical processes available today that prolong life but do not guarantee recovery for example, processes like dialysis, which are used for kidney failure are very painful and do not improve quality of life.

Similarly, in case of cancer, people are usually recommended to undergo chemotherapy, while it may seem to extend the life of the patient, it may put the patient in a lot of duress. While the drugs used in chemotherapy are powerful enough to destroy cancer cells, they also destroy the healthy cells within a patients’ body. For some patients the process chemotherapy is worse than the disease itself. Thus, it is evident that though medicines extend life, it creates more problems than benefits because people’s quality of life deteriorates.

Some might argue that longer life expectancy means that the older generation can guide and instruct the younger generation. The wisdom and skills of the older generation can help the younger generation overcome problems they face in their work or personal life. For example, senior employees can help younger employees to understand the challenges of work. However, it is not necessarily true that longer lives make older folk wiser. With our ever changing society it can also be said that wisdom of the past is not relevant today.  Although there are seniors that are adapting to social and technological changes, but they are few in numbers. Thus, longer life does not mean that people live a wiser life and more than benefit it becomes a liability.

Another important point is that people who have a longer life expectancy can become a burden on their children. This can lead to poor living conditions. Though children love their parents, it is common to come across cases of parental abuse and children keeping their parents in poor condition because they can no longer care for them. Japan is a prime example of this point. Japan has the highest percentage of aging population, which is expected to rise to forty percent in 2050. With changing family dynamics, more parents are being left alone by their children, which leads them to die alone.

The future of the elderly seems even bleaker when we hear cases where parents are left alone on streets to fend for themselves or abused by their own children. For example, a survey conducted in India by Age well foundation, showed that 7o per cent of the elderly were harassed and mistreated by their own family members and relatives. Longer life expectancy of parents might put financial and emotional burden on the children leading them to take unexpected steps. Therefore, it can be said that longer life expectancy brings more problems than benefits.

In conclusion, longer life expectancy is more problematic than beneficial because it leads to crippling effects on the elderly, it also deteriorates the quality of life of people and puts an immense burden on the younger generation financially and emotionally. Long life is only good when it enables people to lead quality productive lives. Longer life is only good when the elderly have the financial resources to look after themselves. Longer life does indeed create more problems than benefits.

Gp Lah! Don’t just read. Write oso lah!

Eh, you write and send your essay lah! Dont be lazy.

All Gp essays here are unedited and written by students in 90 minutes. The essays are posted for students to learn and critique so that they can write better more insightful Gp essays.

If you would like to upload your essays, please contact Jit Sharma (email [at] thegptutor.com). If you want to upload Sec4 essays, can oso lah!

Interested in curated content besides essays? do check out Flipboard.

Eh, you write and send your essay lah! Dont be lazy. For starters, you can read this essay, Quite shiok!

Human actions should be based on scientific fact, not religious faith. Do you agree?

But the caveat is that it is important for those that tow religious doctrine to base their actions on moral outcomes instead of blind faith.

While there is no doubt that science is valuable and explains many concepts objectively, but we should not completely forget about religion. While human beliefs should be driven by scientific fact rather than religious facts, science should be only relied on when it provides definite answers and absolute solutions. Religious facts should be relied in the areas which are ambiguous.

Science provides objective solutions and evidence to many problems. Scientific facts explain many phenomena. For example, from the daily cycle of day and night, to the occurrence of earthquakes and tsunamis. Scientific facts have also provided us with cures for many diseases and life-threatening situations. On the other hand, religious facts have always tried to associate all phenomena with a supreme being. For example, it was considered that leprosy was a curse of god and signified impurity. Many people in the older times believed that curing diseases required penance and rituals to pacify the angry gods. However, scientific evidence has proved that diseases and illnesses are caused by bacteria, viruses and anti-bodies, which has caused many diseases to be cured scientifically. Champions of scientific fact suggest that human actions should be guided by scientific facts rather than human actions.

Science has provided people with weapons of mass destruction but only our morals guide us whether to use them or not. Though religion does not base its facts on empirical research, it does provide us solutions to moral dilemmas through dictating what is right and wrong. Though some religious practices today may be considered oppressive it cannot be denied that majority of religious teachings are positive as they teach people kindness, compassion and honesty. Though these tenets can be practiced without the need of faith, it can be said that religion provides an authoritative institute which makes sure that these principles are adhered to, It is also true that without religion it would be difficult to provide basis for moral actions. If more people considered only science as god then there is possibility that everyone can turn into doctor Frankenstein and would try to consider themselves as god. Therefore, humans should place their actions on religious faith rather than scientific facts when moral dilemmas arise.

Science also fails in providing substantial evidence of our existence of where did we come from and its meaning. The scientific evidence does not satisfy us on an emotional level as the answers provided by science are ambiguous. For example,  science fails to explain how creatures, be it human beings or even unicellular organisms have such complex and intricate structure. It then begs the question that is it just by chance or is it because some higher power has made them this way. Thus, science does not always provide evidence about such questions, and thus people often rely on religious fact.

Logically, it seem prudent that human actions should be based mostly on scientific fact. However, in the absence of conclusive evidence, we should place our faith in religion. Individuals who believe in religion should not be derided as religion gives them hope instead of just objective facts. But the caveat is that it is important for those that tow religious doctrine to base their actions on moral outcomes instead of blind faith.