Is public funding in the arts ever worthwhile? Discuss the question with reference to your country.

“Art is the lie that enables us to realise the truth”, as quoted from Pablo Picasso, the world-renowned artist. This quote represents how art allows and provides us with a perspective to look at the world. Art is a body of the Arts, which is the creative and imaginative embodiment of the distinctive disciplines, be it artwork or architectural designs, brings about both pros and cons. In Singapore, being an economically driven country would rather spend a larger portion of its public funds towards businesses and enterprising which is deemed more profitable towards the economy due to its practicality. However, I agree that there should be public funding for arts as it can attract tourists to boost the economy, allow the freedom of subject choices to groom local talents and to allow Singaporeans to return to their roots.

Some may argue that the Arts is largely only for the rich and spending public money on events would only affect the rich. This is largely a waste of public resources as in Singapore, public funds are supposed to help and push for further growth in Singapore, alongside with those who are less well to do. For example, the Affordable Art Fair and Arts Place are government-funded events to allow local and foreign artists to sell their works. Even though it is named the Affordable Art Fair, the lowest price of an art piece sold is nearly $8000, which in no way is affordable to any commoner around. This means that money spent may not have any returns to the government and only the wealthier are able to participate in such events. This also means that in fact, the less fortunate people do not reap any benefits from the public fund for arts when those funds could have been dedicated towards healthcare subsidies which are necessities for the society. However, this may not be fully true as with such events held locally, Singapore has gained placing in the Arts industry, allowing for the generation of more government revenue to tackle bread and butter issues with greater abilities.

Public money should be used towards supporting the Arts as it would attract tourists, allowing for greater tourist expenditure and thus greater revenue. For example, with the recent Night Festival event, where different types of art installations and performances were staged, it has attracted crowds of tourists to visit and enjoy the vibrant festival. This means that due to such unique events held in Singapore, it would attract tourists from all around the globe to grab a glimpse of the events. This is even more so as it is free to the public. Singapore, being an economy which gross domestic product is largely dependent on tourism of nearly twenty per cent, would reap the benefits of greater tourist expenditure. This would mean to say with such returns, the public funds are not wasted in a sense that it would attract tourists to generate more funds to help the needy.

Next, public funds are not considered to be wasted in terms of expenditure on Arts education in Singapore. This means that with expenditure on Art education in Singapore, students are exposed to a totally different disciplinary in such a heavily scientific education in Singapore. For example, with government-funded art institutions like Lasalle and Nanyang Academy of the Fine Arts, students who are interested in the field of the Arts are given the opportunity to take up Art education if they are keen to. Additionally, with Arts play in place in Secondary School, compulsory subjects like Combined Humanities act as an introduction to students about a disciplinary in the field. This would allow the students to be groomed to have alternative thinking and allow students who are less scientifically inclined to succeed and prosper in this largely scientific educational system. This means that with the expenditure of such public funds, students’ potential in the arts are fully utilised and maximised, allowing students to dwell into their potential and achieve, allowing everyone to be stretched and groomed to their fullest potential. This could not have been possible without such avenues and such talents may go to waste in the long run. Thus, public funds should be utilised in the Arts to allow people to discover their potential and prosper to contribute to society.

Lastly, public money should be used towards supporting the Arts as it would allow us to return us to our roots. This means that the arts in every individual’s culture in Singapore would give descendants a better understanding of one’s race. For example, in Singapore, distinct places of cultural background like Chinatown and Little India, have funds allocated in presenting important and distinct characteristic like architectural designs and religious places of worship that bring individuals back to their roots. This is additionally important for Singaporeans as being the social quilt, where there is a large diversity of races and religions in Singapore, it is important for citizens to return to their roots to have and know their placing in life. Thus, the Arts expenditure in terms of presenting cultural evidence would be largely beneficial to allow citizens to return to their roots of origin in terms of value and faith.

All in all, even though public funds could have been directed towards necessities like healthcare or education, the Arts should be funded in the case of Singapore where most of our bread and butter issues have been settled and where the Arts industry would generate benefits too. Additionally, the investment in the arts may be a sine qua non to my society’s status, bringing my society towards greater heights.

‘Public money should not be wasted on supporting the Arts.’ Discuss this view in light of your society today.

The arts allow people to express, to learn, and to live. It broadens perspectives and fosters understanding among different and diverse groups of people, which is especially essential in today’s society. Government-funded programmes and initiatives provide the youth in Singapore with a more holistic education, creating more opportunities. Additionally, to allow for easier and more affordable appreciation of the Arts, subsidies have been implemented to increase cultural awareness in this modern society. Furthermore, not only is the funding to support the Arts, not a waste, it may also be an investment for the country. Therefore, to improve this society we live in, the use of public money for supporting the Arts should be encouraged.

Some sceptics may argue that the Arts industry is very competitive, and only a handful of particularly talented individuals would have the ability to succeed in the Arts, hence many would not support the money being invested in a field whereby only a minority would benefit. For example, there are few local singers who have managed to break into the global market, such as The Sam Willows and Gentle Bones, out of the many who have been in the industry. The small percentage of those who are successful reinforces the stereotype that the Arts is not practical and only talented individuals should have an interest in the Arts. Hence public money should probably be invested in the facilities that benefit the larger majority, such as transport which has been so often complained about. However, in today’s modern society, to ensure that students are all-round and provided with ample opportunities to find their interests, the Government has introduced programmes to create a more holistic education, as opposed to a very rigid curriculum. For example, in publicly funded schools, there is the Arts and Music Elective Programme, which would allow students to have more options in the subjects they can take. In addition, there is the Singapore Youth Festival, organised every two years to take part and compete in. Since these are initiated from a young age, and it is compulsory for all children to attend Primary and Secondary school, approximately 10 years of formal education, creativity is encouraged by young and instilled. These programmes create a more holistic education and encourage youths to dare to pursue their interests, creating a larger talent pool for the Arts. In addition, recently, Nathan Hartono has achieved success in entering Sing! China, a singing competition held in China. He is one of the many local singers going global to pursue their dreams, proving that given the right support, it is possible for Singaporeans to break into the international market. Therefore, public money should continue to be used in supporting the Arts, to allow Singaporeans a chance to realise their aspirations.

In addition, the Arts can be used to increase cultural awareness, foster understanding in today’s society. For example, to allow Singaporeans easier access to the Arts, the government has subsided visits to the National Gallery of Singapore, where Singaporeans are able to enter for free. This would encourage more Singaporeans of all ages to try to appreciate and understand the Arts. There is emphasis placed on the importance of cultural awareness as the Arts helps to broaden perspectives and foster understanding. A single work of art can evoke different emotions and alternative viewpoints, and the Arts is a viable platform for people to interact and understand differences. In today’s world, it is even more essential to rid the tunnel-vision many of us possess, especially with all the controversial issues happening around the world. To ensure that the racial harmony and social cohesion in Singapore is not compromised, but strengthened instead when such controversial issues on discrimination and equality are brought up, the government has very rightfully used money to support the Arts as in the long-run, Singapore would be a more compassionate and graceful society with people who encompass empathy, which is key in the strengthening of a county which has so many different cultures and religions.

Furthermore, today, Singapore is a fast advancing society and with the influx of foreigners, the Arts industry is a viable job sector. Though in the past, when there was a lack of support for the Arts industry, many believed that a job in the Arts scene would not be practical nor sustainable. However, now, with increased competition, the Arts industry can be a considerable option with increased public funding, and the skills picked up in learning the Arts in schools, such as being detailed and precise, freedom of expression and so on, can be applied to many job sectors. For example, doing mass communication and design. Many forget that the Arts can come in many forms, such as photograph, literature, theatre, singing and the list goes on. With public money invested to support the Arts, many Singaporeans are given the opportunity to find their passion and have a sustainable job. With more people being able to find a job, there is less burden on the government to provide financial aid for the unemployed. Hence, though at the beginning, using public money to find the supporting of the Arts may seem to be a waste, in the long-run, the benefits of having a stronger economy and less people having to depend on the government, and hence money originally meant for aid, can be used in other sectors such as healthcare, therefore the government should support the Arts to see the potential benefits the Arts can bring for the people, and the economy. In addition, the government encourages the elderly in society to stay relevant when they take part in free activities such as arts and craft, and Zumba at community centres nationwide.

To conclude, in today’s society, mindsets are changing, and the Arts creates a bridge between the people and the Government’s ideals, such as fostering social harmony. In this competitive we live in, there is still a need to learn new skills to remain relevant, and the Arts functions to do that. Therefore, not only should public money be used to support the Arts, it should be continued, and even more could be put in for a brighter future.

‘International cooperation has no place in this competitive world.’ Discuss.

His name is Omar. A picture of a toddler caked-on with debris and dirt with blood dripping down his head sitting in an ambulance had taken the Internet by storm earlier this month. This gave an alarm and wake-up call to the world to stop the many wars and fights occurring in conflict-ridden countries such as Syria. Similarly, the effect of a single picture on the global community was seen when a picture of a toddler washed up on a beach was taken and posted on the internet depicting the thousands of lives lost at sea as a result of the Syrian Refugee crisis. These pictures had no doubt created an increased sense of urgency and pressure on agents of international cooperation to intervene and collectively put an end to the many events occurring in the world. However, the real question is, how effective is international cooperation in the world today? The questioning of its effectiveness has then led to the debacle whether international cooperation is still relevant in today’s’ increasingly competitive world, which may cause countries to prioritize their national interests over that of global interests. However, this essay argues that some issues are unable to be solved single-handedly and require a collective effort to overcome. Furthermore, the world has become increasingly interlinked as a result of globalization and hence certain internal issues may, in turn, affect other countries. The increased competitiveness has also instead, made international cooperation more relevant as it can bring about economic benefits to be parties involved. Therefore, there is no doubt that international cooperation still has a place in today’s competitive world.

The characteristic of today’s’ world, which is that of an increase in connectivity, has made international cooperation extremely useful as issues affecting a country can, in turn, affect another. Globalization has no doubt brought about greater mobility of goods and services, labour, technological know-how and capital. As a result of this phenomenon, countries and the global community are more interlinked causing issues that may seem to only affect the internal stability of a country to affect other countries as well. For example, the annual haze that has been occurring as a result of the illegal deforestation in Indonesia has greatly affected its regional neighbours such as Singapore. As a result of the haze that has reached unhealthy and dangerous levels, the non-material standard of living of many in the region has decreased as they suffer from health problems such as breathing difficulties. Furthermore, the bad air quality has resulted in a loss of tourism earnings for many countries such as Singapore whose attractions and skylines were drowned by the haze. International cooperation has played a part in helping Indonesia to alleviate the problem, where regional countries had offered aid and assistance in taming the fires. For example, Singapore has offered assistance in the form of cloud seeding and dispatched many relief helicopters. Furthermore, as a result of the international pressures and attention on this issue, the Indonesian government had recently been able to obtain a sum of money by the company responsible to pay for the damage done. Therefore, as a result of the link between countries, issues that affect one country may, in turn, affect others. Another example would be that of epidemics and diseases such as Ebola that stemmed from Sierra Leone. With greater mobility through great inventions such as the aeroplane and boats, these viral and transmissible diseases could cause a global pandemic and have the ability to wipe out billions of people at once. Thus, with international cooperation playing a part, aid and assistance would be rendered to affected countries to treat and find antidotes to the disease. Therefore, although the world is increasingly competitive, the increased interconnectivity has made international cooperation to be of importance.

However, critics may argue that as a result of a more competitive global environment, cooperation between countries is often hindered by the fact that they may prioritize their national interests over global interests. As we move to a more competitive environment, where the common mindset is that of the ‘survival of the fittest’, countries are often finding ways to outshine other countries and to better upgrade their comparative advantage. This is to prevent other countries from eroding their competitiveness and thus, ensuring their relevance in today’s’ fast-paced world. Due to this mindset, efforts to tackle global problems are often rendered to be ineffective and useless, as many tend to prioritize their own interests even though a greater good could be achieved. For example, in the fight for environmental conservation by reducing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, international cooperation has been proven thus far to be ineffective. In the Kyoto Protocol established in 2002, this idea of prioritization of national interests can be seen as many big countries such as China and Russia had pulled out upon the very beginning of discussions. Furthermore, the USA has yet to ratify the protocol, stating that doing so would only result in great economic loss to the American economy. The ratification by these larger countries is important as these economic powerhouses are the ones that churn out the immerse amount of greenhouse gases but yet, are not willing to sacrifice economic growth for environmental conservation to be achieved. Furthermore, countries play the blame game by pushing responsibility to other countries. For example, developed nations blame developing nations as their current industrialization are the ones greatly increasing the production of these gases while developing nations are blaming the developed nations for their past industrialization. This ‘game’ that they play puts across the idea of unwillingness to accept responsibility, and thus, limit the place and effectiveness of the role of international cooperation in today’s world where countries fight for their economic prosperity and power. Hence, due to this, international cooperation can be said to not have a place in our competitive world.

On the contrary, international cooperation can be said to be even more important amidst a more competitive environment as it can, in turn, result in mutually beneficial results that ensure their relevance in the world. Small economies and countries such as that of Singapore can be said to be a country that can greatly benefit from international cooperation economically. For small countries, the increase in competitiveness of many countries can threaten its long-term survival as larger economic powerhouses have the ability to develop and thus, replace and erode the comparative advantages of these small economies. Since these small economies largely gain their economic prosperity through trade and seek external sources of growth, their economic survival and relevance could be easily wiped out. However, with the role of international cooperation, the setting up of economic groups such as Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Asia-Pacific Economic Corporation (APEC) could essentially bring about lots of economic benefits. For example, through ASEAN, Singapore has gained access to many free-trade agreements and treaties that enable her to expand her industries and obtain growth. Another example of the role of international cooperation in the setting of a competitive world would be the South China Sea dispute. The role of international cooperation is extremely crucial for small countries as amidst larger economies, they may be bullied and ignored. With the discovery of the importance of reefs and sea-coasts as they contain hidden reserves of oil, many countries such as the Philippines, China and Vietnam claimed territories in the South China Sea. However, small countries often face the wrath of bigger economies such as China, which often treads onto their claimed territories. For example, in 2014, China had crossed into Vietnam’s claimed territories with an offshore oilrig, resulting in great protests in Vietnam. However, with international cooperation, these small countries that are part of ASEAN, are able to garner strength and support to stand up against China. Subsequently, the Philippines and many other countries have reported China to international organizations such as the International Court of Justice. As a result of this, recently, China historical claims on the South China Sea due to its nine-dash line has been rejected, as it’s claimed territories were not within 12 nautical miles of its mother-land. Therefore, with the help of international cooperation, the fight to obtain natural resources to gain an advantage in the competitive world can be utilized against larger economies that seek to bully smaller ones.

Furthermore, some issues are unable to be solved solely by one nation and thus, causing international cooperation to play a role in today’s’ competitive world. The sheer extent of some issues are too large for a nation to solve and although the world experiences greater competitiveness, it is often in their moral obligation to help another country. For example, in the situation of natural disasters that may occur, such as that of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in 2011, Haiti Earthquake in 2010 and the typhoon Haiyan in 2014, international cooperation is said to be extremely crucial. Although America is currently facing debt in the global economy, it has provided humanitarian aids in many disaster-stricken countries and has aided them in their recovery. For example, it is one of the largest donator of aid and assistance in the Haiti earthquake as well as during the typhoon Haiyan, contributing billions of dollars to alleviate the aftermath of these events. Another example would be that Venezuela had helped in the Haiti earthquake by cancelling some of the debt generated by Haiti’s import expenditure. This shows that moral obligation does take form in our increasingly competitive world as many countries had given up economic prosperity to assist many countries that face mass destruction due to disasters. Furthermore, some issues such as terrorism are of such a large scale that international cooperation is often needed to overcome and tackle it. Terrorism as a result of the Syrian Crisis is of such a large scale that international cooperation is needed, as the government itself is unable to control and place an end to it. With the role of cooperation amongst the former Cold-War rivals, America and Russia, they have recently agreed in a proposed plan to counter the terrorist threats such as the Islamic State in Syria. By placing an end to the Syrian crisis, the refugee crisis would then be alleviated and the 2,500 lives lost in the sea by May 2016 would be reduced. Therefore, even though the increasingly competitive world may cause countries to think about their own problems and benefits first, issues that require humanitarian aid and assistance still requires the role of international cooperation to play a part in alleviating unnecessary human suffering.

All in all, even though the world is increasingly competitive and countries tend to prioritize their economic priorities, international cooperation still has a place in the world. The world would be a better place with collective effort and cooperation.