‘A university education is becoming increasingly irrelevant to success.’ Discuss.

Success in today’s world greatly hinges on how outstanding a person is in his career. A few decades ago, university graduates were almost guaranteed a good job with a good measure of success. However, that is becoming increasingly untrue for society today. While university students are armed with much knowledge which is supposed to empower them, the increasing speed at which the world is moving is making university education increasingly irrelevant to success. The reality is that university education is becoming too common, too limited and how information learnt is irrelevant.

Our society is creating more new knowledge and technology than it can be learnt, causing university education to be outdated, rendering it irrelevant. The intention of studying at a university for an individual is so that he can be equipped with specialized skills needed to be competitive in the industry, and thereby achieving success. However, the turnover of information and technology in universities is not able to keep up with the world. Take for example the biotechnology industry where new discoveries are being made on a weekly or even daily basis. It is impossible for university education to remain relevant to a student’s success through the education provided.

Some may argue that though universities are not able to keep up, universities conduct projects for students to know more about the latest information, and also that this fast turnover of information does not have much effect, not in the field of science. However, a point to note is that most students, in order to do well, gather information from past students and add on to it so slightly. Hence, can it be said that their information is up-to-date, considering their desire to do well exceeds their desire for learning? Also, with regards to students not in the field of science, these students, they learn mainly from experiences of what happens in the real world. As the world moves faster, more things happen as well, the world is changing fast, and university education cannot keep up with it. Hence, university education is fast becoming increasingly irrelevant due to the fast-changing tides of our world today. University education is no longer a passport to success because it is becoming increasingly common. In the past, university graduates could easily get a job because they were the cream of their crop in their society back then.

However, degree holders are widely available for employers to take a pick from in modern society. This can be seen from graduates who end up as hawkers in the food court, and the number of unemployed graduates out there. It can be argued that university education is still relevant to success even though it is common because as graduates become more common, so do jobs requiring their skills to become available to them compared to old times. However, when one speaks of success, it goes beyond having a job but being distinguished as an individual apart from other people. With university education being so common, our competitors will very well end up as another university graduate, which makes university education irrelevant since graduates do not stand out. Furthermore, university education does not prepare students adequately for the world out there enough for them to wield success in their hands.

The world is shrinking, our economy is no longer confined to our region but going global. University education is unable to equip people enough to deal with people of different cultures and perspectives in the world out there, which is imperative to success. This is not something that can be imparted and remain relevant to university education due to a lack of time. This is evident from how university students in order to adapt have to take up cultural classes in order to survive. Indeed, it is true that learning is a life – long process, it is just right that graduates should equip themselves better by learning more, and does not make university education irrelevant to success. However, if it is so, university education does not play a part in success anymore, because anyone and everyone can take up such classes so as to survive, even without a degree. Hence due to globalization, university education is becoming increasingly lacking in providing social skills with regard to different cultures for students to thrive, hence making university education irrelevant to success.

Also, our world is becoming a world where people thrive because of innovation and abilities apart from those acquired from academic discourse. University education imparts the best that they know how for graduates to survive. However, in today’s world, a degree is no longer a benchmark of capability. In our world today, capabilities need to be proven first before it can be recognized and used for success, and such capabilities do not require a university education. In today’s world, we are seeing an increasing number of people without a university degree being successful because of their innovations and talents. An example would be the proud owners of Creative technology, and Breadtalk, where they did not get much of an education but made it big. The case is clear that university education is irrelevant today.

“The elderly fulfil a vital and indispensable function in society.” Do you agree?

The role of an elderly has been of prime importance since ancient times. People have depended upon elders for advice and instructions. Changing family structure, scientific progress and demographic projections, have brought about a change in attitude towards the aged population of all countries. Unfortunately, the elderly population today is being treated as a burden by the younger generation. However, this attitude is fallacious as the elders can still play a prominent role in society. The role of the elderly in nations progress has great importance as their experience and wisdom pave the path for the younger generation to move efficiently towards their goals. Thus, it is true that the elderly fulfil a vital and indispensable function in society.

The young generation is supposed to be the wealth of any nation; and, the elderly add value to this wealth. Senior citizens accumulate a wealth of wisdom through their experiences. These experiences can be used to teach the young generation about the fine line between right and wrong. The elderly through their anecdotes can help the young people develop values and ideals that could prove beneficial for them. It is often seen that children who grow up in the company of their grandparents are more sympathetic, kind, generous and supportive. Sharing of thoughts develops a sense of togetherness and alienates gloom. The veterans in the family can kindle virtues and restrain vice through amicable guardianship.

Detractors would insist that in today’s world children are growing up surrounded by a different set of challenges. The philosophies of the elderly belong to a different time period and are outdated and irrelevant in the modern context. In the materialistic world of mechanical prevalence, youth would rather prefer to be speedy and smart than slow and steady.

However, truth is never outdated and technology cannot replace human influence. Despite the intervention of eLearning, the role of a teacher is still irreplaceable; so is the role of the elderly. As time is moving fast and the new generation is in a hurry to achieve the goals of life, it becomes all the more important that they be in contact with the elders who can prevent them from tumbling into erroneous pitfalls of modernity.

The elderly can contribute to nations development as zealously as the young and perhaps more. Growing in age does not hamper abilities, in fact it enhances them. Physical weakness and cognitive deterioration are possible but that does not categorize the old people as completely unproductive and useless. The judges in the judiciary, senior professors, scientists, and such people in all fields are working efficiently despite their age. The world has innumerable examples of the aged and even disabled aged individuals making their contributions to the world at large. The anti-Apartheid activist and former South African president Nelson Mandela announced the formation of an international group, The Elders when he was eighty-seven years old. This organisation works for solving the most challenging problems of the world like-HIV AIDS, poverty and climate change and has the support of Kofi Anan, Jimmy Carter, Mary Robinson, Desmond Tutu and many more social activists and veterans. Famous writers, authors, artists, musicians have added to the aesthetic and artistic creations of the world even in the twilight years of their life. John Milton, after spending his youthful days as political pamphleteer created his masterpieces Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained in later years and after having impaired his vision.

Those that hold opposing views suggest that ageing is inevitably linked to senility. Advancement in science and medical facilities can protect the elderly from mortal chronic diseases, but most of the time they survive with some sort of impairment that makes long term care mandatory. As the dependency ratio, is showing an increased percentage in near future, the elders will only add to the social, financial and moral burden- the young will feel the guilt of not being able to take proper care of the elders- on the young. Lacking not merely in strength but also in standard education, old people cannot actively participate in progressive productivity. The brilliant spark of creativity is found only in a few, while the majority grope about in awful helplessness.

It would be myopic to disregard the fact that medical advancements and improvements in healthcare are keeping the elderly hale and hearty. Elderly today not only survive; they also remain fit and active by indulging in activities like exercise, dance and even swimming. Increased life expectancy and better health are resources that societies should utilize for enhancing productivity as well as strengthening the workforce. The elderly population today is ever ready to compromise and, in many companies, there are aged people who have much younger bosses. The need is to treat the senior citizens with regard and capitalize on their wisdom rather than seclude them as unproductive or a cumbersome load.

The future of the Earth is safe under the prudent care of the baby boomers and the generation X population. Thus, it can well be concluded that the greying lot of citizens fulfil a vital and indispensable function in society.

Is it true that our environmental problems are so incredibly huge and complex that it is impossible for an ordinary individual to make a difference?

In the pursuit of economic development, many people have begun to abandon their responsibilities as stewards of the environment, resorting to exploiting the environment for their own selfish purposes, resulting in alteration of the chemical composition of the atmosphere and a relentless depletion of our natural resources which contribute to a major climate change – global warming. Indeed, global warming is an incredibly huge and complex matter. There is simply no single root cause of our environmental problems as they are, in fact, caused by an inexhaustible list of factors that makes it more difficult to handle the situation. Furthermore, it gives us countless problems, like increasing temperature, rising sea levels and extinction of our natural habitats and their habitats, in which the solutions to them are intertwined with political and economic issues as well. Hence, such a complicated environmental issue may cause ordinary people to have a lack of clear understanding or knowledge about the environmental issue, resulting in them resigning to the idea that they cannot make a difference in combating the environmental problems and relying on the government, non-governmental organizations and businesses in tackling the matter instead. However, it is never impossible for individuals to help reduce environmental problems as there are so many ways they can help mitigate the environmental degradation that they themselves have caused over the years. As children of our own environment, it is time for mankind to step up for the sake of their mother nature, their own selves and their future generation.

               Some may argue that ordinary individuals may lack authority over their community and hence are unable to make any significant contribution to reducing global warming. Many believe that big authorities like the governments are the only ones who can effectively handle the environmental issue. Certainly, the individual work of the governments as well as the global collaboration among different governments has been quite effective in addressing the complex environmental issue. More and more local governments, especially those of developed countries, have begun to place environmental sustainability as one of their priorities, imposing certain rules and regulations to ensure that all the firms and residents meet up to a certain eco-friendly standard and taking up projects that are pro-environment. For instance, more countries have begun to take interest in building eco-cities. Recently, there has been a joint collaboration between Singapore and China to build an eco-friendly city in Tianjin while the Abu Dhabi government has also channelled huge amounts of funds into constructing a sustainable, zero-carbon and zero-waste Madar city. Such efforts to creating environmentally friendly cities ensure that the countries would maximize the usage of renewable sources of energy and minimize ecological footprint and pollution. Furthermore, as environmental conservation is of major global concern, world leaders from different governments have begun to launch initiatives to accelerate work on global warming. One such notable collaboration among governments is the signing of the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by reducing the production of substances that cause ozone depletion. It has currently been ratified by 196 states and has effectively implemented market-based, flexible and innovative approaches to ensure ozone layer protection, resulting in the emission of some ozone-depleting substances like the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in recent years. Moreover, the governments from developed countries have also agreed to give financial help to those from developing countries to meet international environmental standards. Hence, it seems that the scale of impact of the governments’ decisions and the amount of funding devoted to environmental conservation are extremely large and may therefore seem incomparable to that of ordinary individuals’ efforts.  Thus, it seems that ordinary individuals may not be able to make a significant difference in tackling the environmental issue and the governments may be more successful in doing so instead.

               However, it is important to note that the individuals can certainly make a considerable impact in moving towards environmental conservation as they are ultimately the ones who choose the government and influence the decisions of the governments. This is especially evident where many election parties place great emphasis on climate change as one of their methods of campaigning, which shows that the various parties stand on the climate issue does matter in the individuals’ decisions on which party they should elect. As such, individuals who are concerned about the environment would elect parties that hold similar views about the environmental issue, allowing individuals’ interests to be met by the parties they vote for. Furthermore, individuals cannot merely rely on the governments to handle the environmental issue as there is often a case where collaboration among organizations has failed to meet its desired ends. The 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit is well-known, not so much for what it achieved, but what it did not. Even though many countries have pledged to aid environmental conservation while the rich countries promised to aid poorer countries economically, a decade later, they still have not lived up to their promises. Recently in 2009, the Copenhagen Summit, which the world watched in anticipation, resulted in a loud thud of an anti-climax when it ended with frustrations and walk-outs by world leaders rather than decisions to effectively solve the environmental problems. Therefore, as seen by such environmental conferences which are often derided as “talk shops”, it seems that global collaboration among the governments may sometimes be unsuccessful and cannot be relied upon by individuals to tackle the environmental issue. Hence, sometimes, the individual effort may be more effective than collaboration times as there would be no conflict of interests or delay due to extensive red tape.

               Others may also argue that as industrial wastes contribute the most to environmental destruction, individual efforts to environmental conservation may have little impact as the main cause of environmental degradation is the actions of businesses and firms, in which ordinary individuals have little influence. For example, DuPont, a chemical industry, used to be criticized over the years for its environmental record due to the huge environmental damage done during its manufacturing processes. However, recently, DuPont has recognized that finding truly sustainable options for its production processes is important, and is therefore adopting eco-friendly initiatives to reduce the amount of energy, water and materials used when designing products or processes. In fact, they have put environmental concerns as one of its priorities other than safety and health, allowing the firm to gain a reputation for its social commitment to environmental conservation. Such efforts made by businesses are likely to have a more significant impact than individual efforts as they are more likely to successfully reduce emissions and wastages in the highly industrialized societies of today.

               However, there are some ways individuals can make a difference in the business sector. Businesses are consumer-driven, as products and services are created for the benefit of the consumers. Therefore, consumers’ interests and wants are likely to have a significant impact on the decisions of the firms. This can be seen by how there has been a growing emphasis on “green marketing” these days where firms are trying to gain a reputation for going green as they have realized that consumers are willing to support firms who are trying to conserve the environment by purchasing their products, even though it means that they have to pay a little higher price. Furthermore, individuals taking a stand on environmental issues may prevent businesses from adopting certain practices that harm the environment. For instance, for years, environmental organizations had tried to campaign for the fishing of tuna to be dolphin-friendly, meaning the nets used to catch tuna do not catch dolphins and kill them. However, it was only when individual consumers began to start making a conscious choice to buy dolphin-friendly tuna that the businesses started to practice dolphin-friendly fishing methods for economic reasons. Therefore, individuals can take advantage of consumer sovereignty that reigns in the market sector to take a stand on certain environmental causes, thereby making a significant impact on environmental conservation made by the business sector.

Individual efforts are crucial in tackling the environmental problems in other ways as well.  In fact, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are made up of like-minded individuals who work together to achieve a common goal. Individuals who used to have little influence over their community can come together to create such organizations to make a more significant impact on the society. One such NGOs is the World Wildlife Fund was created around 45 years ago to protect the future of the nature by preserving natural habitats and promoting sustainable approaches to environmental conservation. NGOs are effective in influencing the decisions of governments, businesses and individuals and raising awareness about the environmental issues to the global community. Other than forming organizations, individuals who are deeply concerned about the environment can also become environmentalists, writing articles and using other methods to campaign for environmental conservation. For instance, individuals like Al Gore and Leonardo DeCaprio are famous for their films, An Inconvenient Truth and The Eleventh Hour, which focus on how our human activities are harming the environment. Such use of media to create awareness about the environmental issue can effectively make the community less ignorant about what is happening to the world around us. Therefore, individuals can certainly make a difference in addressing the problem of environmental destruction.

Furthermore, individual effort is the fundamental basis of all environmental protection. One once said, “We must not, in trying to think about how we can make a big difference, ignore the small daily differences we can make which, over time, add up to big differences that we often cannot foresee.” Likewise, ordinary individuals can make a significant impact on environmental conservation over time if they make an effort to change their mindsets and their lifestyles appropriately. There are many ways that individuals can adopt eco-friendly lifestyles. For instance, individuals should try to avoid excessive materialistic lifestyles and purchase less so as to create less waste in the future. They can also adopt a Reduce, Reuse, Recycle (3Rs) method to dispose of their wastes and buy environmentally-friendly products like fluorescent light bulbs instead of incandescent light bulbs. Furthermore, individuals can also share with one another some tips on environmentally-friendly living and raise awareness, even if it is of a small scale, about environmental conservation to their friends and families. If everyone tries his or her best to save the environment, it would only be a matter of time before our environmental issue can be greatly reduced.

               In conclusion, it is possible for an ordinary individual to make a difference, be it small or big, to mitigate the impacts of our environmental problems. It is also to be noted that in fact, collaboration itself is the product of many individual efforts as in fact, non-governmental organizations, governments and businesses are made up of individuals who have a certain degree of influence on the decisions made by these groups. Hence, the individual effort is also vital to the success of these organizations in conserving the environment. Since environmental degradation threatens the survival of mankind, it is everyone’s social responsibility to step up and take a stand on the environmental issue so as to make our environmental problems easier to tackle and less complicated than they currently are right now. As one once said, “There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew.” Therefore, it is time we all play a part on saving our mother earth from further damage by our own activities.

‘Terrorists are nothing more than criminals’. Discuss.

Detractors of terrorism criticise it by labelling terrorists as nothing more than criminals as they resort to atrocious acts of violence and bloodshed to achieve their aims. Although this view undoubtedly holds a whit of fidelity, it would be too reductionist and simplistic to believe entirely in it. From a religious and even moral point of view, it must be remembered that all are equal, and even terrorists are ultimately part of the human race. Who are we to judge them and degrade them to nothing more than sinners if we do not understand the complicated situations and environments that they grow up in? Should we not practise what we preach and forgive them for their heinous crimes? It is more than valid to say that the atrocities of terrorists are so frightening that it breeds pure hatred towards them, but it would be myopic to jump the gun and label them as nothing more than criminals.

One of the arguments levelled against terrorists is that their outrageous acts of violence show an absence of compassion and humanity, rendering them as mere sinners who do not deserve to belong to the human race. However, those who argue so fail to realise that terrorists are only doing what they do because of their circumstances. It would be almost impossible for someone living in a well-developed and peaceful country to imagine the environment those growing up in the war-torn Middle-East have to face. The classic example of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is one that tells of severe oppression. The teenagers and young men, sometimes even women, of the Middle-East, only become terrorists after they have experienced the

The devastating loss of loved ones, witnessing them being blown up by those of another religion or ideology. Living in a society where you fear for your life every single day, with helicopter attacks and suicide bombings becoming just another feature of daily life, it would be difficult not to be influenced by the extremist beliefs of religious martyrs that resort to violence. Hence, we cannot hastily come to the conclusion that terrorists are any less human than us as it is their extreme circumstances that give them no other alternative but to resort to bloodshed.

Those who strongly oppose terrorism put forth the argument that the very actions of terrorists show a complete lack of love for humanity. This might hold true to a certain extent, but it would take a bigot to not realise why these terrorists are employing the use of violence. As an oppressed minority, it would not be feasible to wage a conventional war with the majority. If the Catholics in Northern Ireland did not fight for their causes with terrorist measures, they would have stood absolutely no chance against the Protestant government. The Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka exist today because they would never succeed fighting a direct

war against the Singhalese rulers. We should not condone or even come close to accepting terrorism, but we do have to recognise that what terrorists do is not for the mere sake of killing. It is more than a shout for attention so that the world sees what they are fighting for; it is a desperate, last-ditch attempt to secure their basic freedom and rights.

Many who feel strongly against terrorists dismiss them as nothing more than criminals, as their actions portray them as cold, heartless beings, but to do so would be to lack compassion themselves. It is important to remember the very basis that mankind sets out on; everyone is equal. Whether one adopts a religious view or a moral view, it is clear that all members of the human race, some going as far as including the animal kingdom, are born the same, and should be afforded the same love and respect. Just as we do not discriminate against the minorities, those of a different race, colour or religion, we should not be blinded by our anger against these terrorists, and we have to try to understand that despite their actions of violence and slaughter, they are as human as any one of us.

As the world continues to wage its war against terrorism, we have to face the reality that we will never obliterate it entirely from the face of the earth. There will always be majorities or those in power who impose a tyrannical rule on the minority, and this creates the perfect environment that is conducive for the breeding of terrorism. As voices of the oppressed are drowned out by all-powerful governments, the only war that they can wage is that of terrorism. With fear and insecurity as their weapon, they will continue to march behind their shields of extremist beliefs. We cannot simply judge terrorists to be nothing more than criminals as they are only driven by the extremity of their circumstances. Perhaps one day the world will move towards an integrated global society that respects the rights of the minorities, but until then, terrorism will still flourish, as those who do not receive their basic rights and respect will do that they deem necessary to secure them.